Is your loved one at Maple Healthcare Center?
If they fell, developed a bed sore, lost weight, were hurt or abused at Maple Healthcare Center, leave your name and phone. We call back today, request the chart and the full inspection file, and tell you plainly whether there is a case. Free, confidential, English or Spanish.
Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win
Maple Healthcare Center at a glance: owner, beds and ratings
* California separately requires at least 3.5 direct care service hours per patient day, counted under state rules, so the two numbers are not measured the same way.
Records: Cal Health Find ↗ · Medicare Care Compare ↗
Maple Healthcare Center citations and inspection findings
Newest first. State citations come from CDPH; federal deficiencies come from the CMS-2567 inspection report CDPH writes for Medicare. Every row links to the government record.
| Date | Source | Finding | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| August 11, 2026 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Financial Occurrence/Fac Not Self Reported), penalty $5,100 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 25, 2026 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| February 18, 2026 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 5, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Rights), penalty $25,000, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 23, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Abuse Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| April 17, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Administrative Penalty (DHPPD: 2 – 11 Days), penalty $25,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| October 8, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F607 – Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| September 10, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Administrative Penalty (DHPPD: 2 – 11 Days), penalty $25,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 28, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 21, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class B Trebled citation (Medication), penalty $9,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 21, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000 Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| July 8, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Certification | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Abuse Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
Show 7 older findings
| Date | Source | Finding | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F684 – Quality of Care, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| April 25, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| April 10, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,100 Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| March 19, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) Falls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| February 9, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) AbuseFalls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 14, 2023 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $18,650, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| July 13, 2023 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Falls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
What inspectors found at Maple Healthcare Center
Tap a finding to read the summary. Each one is written from the government report linked under it.
August 2025: Class A citation and F600 (severity G) after a security guard struck a resident
According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on June 23, 2025 to investigate a complaint about resident abuse. Resident 1 was a 68-year-old man with dementia and Alzheimer's disease who used a wheelchair. CDPH found the facility did not ensure he was free from physical and verbal abuse by the facility's security guard.
The citation states that around 9:40 PM on June 19, 2025, Resident 1 came to the nursing station yelling after staff redirected him away from the women's hall. CNA 1 saw the security guard argue with Resident 1 and hit him on the back of the head with an open hand. According to a police report reviewed by CDPH, Resident 1 told officers he had been slapped and cursed at, and the guard left before police arrived. The facility notified the physician and police, and progress notes state the guard was not allowed to return. The next day Resident 1 said his head hurt and asked for pain medicine, and he was sent to a hospital for evaluation. The department found he had pain in his head, said he felt embarrassed, and needed the hospital transfer.
CDPH issued a Class A citation in the Patient Rights category with a $25,000 penalty. The federal 2567 report from the same investigation cites F600 (free from abuse and neglect) at severity G.
July 2024: F600 (severity G) and F609 (severity D) after a resident struck and splashed other residents
According to the 2567 report, inspectors found the facility did not protect Resident 5 and Resident 35 from abuse by another resident, Resident 206. Resident 206's care plan called for watching for signs of coming violence and keeping her away from others when those signs appeared. Nursing notes showed staff were monitoring her for aggressive behavior in early June 2024.
The report states that on June 3, 2024, Resident 206 became angry and splashed coffee on Resident 35, who had dementia. Inspectors found that a social services note documenting the coffee incident was later struck out by the social services director and marked as incorrect documentation. On June 23, 2024, around 2 PM, Resident 206 hit her roommate, Resident 5, in the face with an open hand as Resident 5 tried to walk out of their room. Notes state Resident 5 was struck three times. Police arrived and arrested Resident 206, and the report states Resident 5 asked police to take Resident 206 away. Inspectors found both residents suffered psychosocial (mental and emotional) harm.
The 2567 report cites F600 (free from abuse and neglect) at severity G and F609 (reporting of alleged violations) at severity D.
May 2024: F684 (severity G) after a resident missed a month of antifungal medication
According to the 2567 report, Resident 1 had dementia and pulmonary histoplasmosis (a fungal infection of the lungs). On March 19, 2024, the facility received an order from a hospital infectious disease physician for itraconazole (an antifungal medication) 200 mg by mouth three times a day for three days, then twice a day with no end date. Inspectors found the facility gave the three-day doses but did not enter or carry out the twice-daily order. The report states Resident 1 did not receive itraconazole from March 23 to April 24, 2024. LVN 2 told inspectors she could not find the twice-daily order.
The 2567 report states that at a lung clinic visit on April 25, 2024, a scan showed the infection had gotten worse, and the pulmonologist sent Resident 1 to a hospital. A blood test there showed almost no itraconazole in his system. A bone marrow biopsy found the infection had spread to his bones, and the infectious disease physician wrote that not receiving the medication at the facility was almost certainly the reason the disease progressed. He stayed in the hospital for 20 days, until May 14, 2024, and was treated with several antifungal drugs, including one given by IV.
Inspectors cited F684 (quality of care) at severity G.
March 2024: F689 (severity J) after a resident at risk of elopement left the facility and remained missing
According to the 2567 report, Resident 5 had dementia, could not understand and make decisions, had a history of elopement (leaving without staff knowledge), and was at risk for wandering. Inspectors found the facility did not develop a care plan that set how often staff should check his location, did not review his elopement assessment for accuracy, and did not update his care plan to require checks every 15 minutes, as an earlier Immediate Jeopardy removal plan approved on February 29, 2024 required. Inspectors also found the facility did not have enough staff on the 11 PM to 7 AM shift on March 16, 2024.
The report states that around 5:15 AM on March 16, 2024, staff found Resident 5 had eloped, and he remained missing. Inspectors found he faced an increased risk of serious harm or death from missing his antipsychotic medications and physical therapy.
The deficiency was cited under F689 (accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity J. According to the report, inspectors called an Immediate Jeopardy on March 20, 2024, and removed it on March 22 after verifying the facility's removal plan. The plan included searching hospitals, shelters and clinics for Resident 5, reassessing 51 residents and placing 16 at-risk residents on visual checks every 15 minutes, assigning a staff member to watch the front door on every shift, daily checks of the exit doors, staff training, a binder with photos of at-risk residents, and weekly team reviews for six months.
February 2024: F689 (severity J) and F600 (severity G) after a resident eloped and another was slapped
According to the 2567 report, Resident 4 was admitted on February 9, 2024 after eloping twice from another facility within 24 hours, and the facility assessed her as at risk for elopement. Inspectors found that on February 11, 2024, staff called 911 when she threw her body and hands against the front glass door trying to leave, but the interdisciplinary team meeting the next day did not address that attempt or her earlier elopements. The facility also did not provide adequate supervision or strict hourly checks. The report states she eloped on February 22, 2024 between 6:30 and 7 PM and had not been found as of February 29.
Inspectors called an Immediate Jeopardy on February 26, 2024 and removed it on February 29 after verifying the facility's removal plan. The report states the plan included staff training, screwing a bathroom window shut, replacing a wooden fence, grouping 18 at-risk residents in designated rooms, and staff checks every 15 minutes.
The 2567 report also states that on January 28, 2024, Resident 2, who was known to be aggressive and had refused several doses of her medications, slapped Resident 1 in the face on the patio. Inspectors found Resident 2 was not monitored as her care plan required. The findings were cited under F689 (accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity J and F600 (free from abuse and neglect) at severity G.
August 2023: Class A citation and F689 (severity G) after a resident with dementia eloped and was found injured
According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on July 13, 2023 to investigate the elopement of Resident 1. He had epilepsy and dementia, was severely cognitively impaired, wandered, and had been assessed as at high risk for elopement (leaving without staff knowledge). CDPH found the facility did not evaluate his elopement risk when staff saw him regularly sitting by the front door, did not check whether his care plan was working or change it, and did not document routine checks of his location as its own policy required.
The citation states Resident 1 was last seen around 5:45 AM on July 7, 2023 and was missing at the 6 AM medication pass. The administrator told CDPH staff thought he was on the patio near a gate that staff use to enter and leave, and he could have exited without staff knowing. According to the citation, paramedics found Resident 1 unconscious on the ground in a pool of blood, and he was admitted to a hospital intensive care unit on July 12, five days after he left. LVN 2 said he had bruises on his face. The administrator also told CDPH his elopement care plan had not been reviewed quarterly and no team meeting had updated his risks.
CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $20,000 penalty. The federal 2567 report cites F689 (accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity G.
Complaints against Maple Healthcare Center
| Year | Intakes | Complaints | Facility-reported incidents | Substantiated (at least one allegation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 21 | 9 | 12 | 14 |
| 2024 | 29 | 16 | 13 | 18 |
| 2025 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| 2026 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 1 |
Cal Health Find lists 75 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes for this facility from 2023 through October 30, 2026. CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 40 of them. 42 intakes involved an allegation in CDPH’s abuse category, and 19 of those had an abuse allegation substantiated. An intake can contain several allegations; “unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence, not that nothing happened.
Sexual abuse reports at Maple Healthcare Center
Cal Health Find lists 1 intake for Maple Healthcare Center from 2023 through October 30, 2026 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse (0 from complaints and 1 reported by the facility itself). CDPH substantiated a sexual abuse allegation in 1 of them. Federal rules require a nursing home to report an abuse allegation to the state within two hours, so a facility-reported incident means staff raised the allegation, not that it was proven. “Unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence; it does not mean nothing happened.
| Year | Intakes with a sexual abuse allegation | Substantiated |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 | 1 |
Warning signs include bruising or bleeding in the genital area or inner thighs, a new genital infection, torn or stained underclothing, and a resident who suddenly fears a particular staff member or resists being bathed or changed. If you suspect sexual abuse, call 911 or local police first, ask that the resident not be bathed before a medical exam, and then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman. Sexual abuse reports at Los Angeles County nursing homes →
Staffing at Maple Healthcare Center
Payroll records Maple Healthcare Center filed with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for April through June 2026 show an average of 3.96 nursing hours per resident per day, counting registered nurses (RNs), licensed vocational nurses and nurse aides. The California average CMS published for the same period is 4.54, and the Los Angeles County median is 4.32. RN time averaged 0.30 hours per resident per day (California average 0.68). Staffing averaged 3.58 hours on weekends and 4.12 on weekdays.
CMS reports nursing staff turnover of 43.5% at this facility (California average 36.6%) and RN turnover of 50.0% (California average 37.8%).
California requires most skilled nursing facilities to provide at least 3.5 direct care hours per patient day (Health and Safety Code section 1276.65). Counting the RN, LVN and nurse aide hours in the same payroll data, Maple Healthcare Center was below 3.5 on 25 of 91 days. This is our calculation from CMS data, not a CDPH finding: CDPH counts some staff differently (for example psychiatric technicians in special treatment programs) and can grant waivers.
| Maple Healthcare Center | LA County median | California average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total nursing hours per resident per day | 3.96 | 4.32 | 4.54 |
| RN hours per resident per day | 0.30 | 0.46 | 0.68 |
| Weekend nursing hours per resident per day | 3.58 | 3.89 | 4.10 |
| Nursing staff turnover | 43.5% | 34.1% | 36.6% |
Compare staffing, profits and fines across Los Angeles County nursing homes →
Who owns Maple Healthcare Center
The owners and operators below are listed for Maple Healthcare Center in the federal CMS nursing home ownership file (data as of October 1, 2026). CMS requires each Medicare-certified nursing home to report anyone with a 5% or greater ownership stake and anyone with operational or managerial control.
| Owner or operator | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ezequiel Bercovich | 5% or greater direct ownership | 36% | January 1, 2023 |
| Maple University Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership | 30% | January 1, 2023 |
| SNF Management Inc | Operational or managerial control | – | January 1, 2023 |
| Ezequiel Bercovich | Operational or managerial control | – | January 1, 2023 |
| Mark Galeck | Operational or managerial control | – | September 17, 2024 |
| Shuo Wang | Operational or managerial control | – | January 2, 2023 |
In its annual report to the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) for the year ending December 31, 2025, the facility listed $261,276 in payments to related companies (businesses that share owners or management with the facility): $261,276 to SNF Management, Inc for admin expense>management fee. Payments to related companies are legal; California requires nursing homes to disclose them.
Maple Healthcare Center finances
Maple Healthcare Center reported $10.6 million in health care revenue and net income of $1.7 million for the year ending December 31, 2025, a margin of 15.9%, in its annual financial report to HCAI (as submitted; HCAI has not finished reviewing it). The median operating margin that year was 5.9% for Los Angeles County nursing homes and 6.1% statewide. Medi-Cal paid for 74% of resident days. Salaries for RNs, LVNs and nurse aides came to $2.5 million.
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Occupancy | Medi-Cal days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $7.6 million | $564,534 | 7.4% | 91% | – |
| 2024 | $7.7 million | -$165,553 | -2.2% | 86% | 77% |
| 2025 | $10.6 million | $1.7 million | 15.9% | 93% | 74% |
Federal fines and penalties: Maple Healthcare Center
CMS lists 5 federal fines totaling $164,264 and 2 Medicare payment denials for Maple Healthcare Center in the roughly three years its penalty file covers.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 11, 2024 | Fine | $53,645 |
| July 11, 2024 | Payment denial | 64 days |
| April 25, 2024 | Fine | $44,472 |
| February 29, 2024 | Fine | $55,320 |
| February 29, 2024 | Payment denial | 20 days |
| January 8, 2024 | Fine | $3,418 |
| December 18, 2023 | Fine | $7,409 |
Maple Healthcare Center lawsuits and criminal cases
Our search of California Attorney General and Los Angeles County District Attorney announcements, court reports and news coverage for Maple Healthcare Center is not finished yet. This section will be updated when it is; until then, do not read the absence of a case here as a finding that none exists.
What this record means for your family
California uses classes for state citations. Under Health and Safety Code section 1424 ↗, a Class AA citation is a Class A violation that CDPH determined was a direct proximate cause of a resident’s death. A Class A citation means CDPH found an imminent danger, or a substantial probability, that death or serious physical harm would result. Class B covers violations with a direct or immediate relationship to residents’ health, safety or security.
Federal deficiencies carry a letter from A to L. G, H and I mean inspectors found actual harm to residents; J, K and L mean immediate jeopardy, the most serious level. F600 is the federal rule that residents be free from abuse and neglect; F609 and F610 cover reporting and investigating allegations; F689 covers accidents and supervision; F686 covers pressure injuries.
Warning signs worth asking about: unexplained bruises or fractures, new bed sores, sudden weight loss or dehydration, a resident who becomes fearful or withdrawn around certain staff, and calls that go unanswered.
What to do now
- If someone is in danger, call 911.
- File a complaint with CDPH about Maple Healthcare Center: CDPH complaint form ↗
- Contact the long-term care ombudsman, the state-funded advocate for nursing home residents: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman ↗
- Ask the facility in writing for a copy of the resident’s chart, and write down dates, names of staff on shift, and photos of any injury.
- Talk to a Los Angeles nursing home abuse lawyer →
Free nursing home case review
We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.
Questions families ask
Has Maple Healthcare Center been cited by the State of California?
Cal Health Find lists 6 state citations for Maple Healthcare Center since 2023, including 0 Class AA and 2 Class A. Each one is listed in the timeline above with a link to the CDPH record.
How many complaints have been filed against Maple Healthcare Center?
From 2023 through October 30, 2026, Cal Health Find lists 75 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes, and CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 40 of them.
Does Medicare flag Maple Healthcare Center for abuse?
Yes. As of our data date, Medicare Care Compare shows its abuse icon for Maple Healthcare Center. CMS uses the icon for facilities cited for abuse that harmed a resident in the past year, or cited for abuse with potential harm in each of the past two years.
Have there been sexual abuse reports at Maple Healthcare Center?
Cal Health Find lists 1 complaint or facility-reported incident intake at Maple Healthcare Center since 2023 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse, and CDPH substantiated 1. The section above breaks them down by year.
Where can I read reviews and complaints about Maple Healthcare Center?
Online reviews are opinions. The official record is the state and federal inspection file: this page summarizes it and links each citation, complaint outcome and inspection report on Cal Health Find and Medicare Care Compare, so you can read the source yourself.
How many beds does Maple Healthcare Center have?
Maple Healthcare Center is licensed by CDPH for 59 beds and has a CMS overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars.
Who owns or operates Maple Healthcare Center?
CDPH lists the licensee as MAPLE HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC. CMS does not list a chain for this facility. According to the CMS ownership file, Maple University Holdings, LLC holds 30% as a direct owner. The full list of owners and operators CMS reports is in the ownership section of this page.
How many nursing hours does Maple Healthcare Center provide per resident?
Payroll data the facility filed with CMS for April through June 2026 show 3.96 total nursing hours per resident per day, including 0.30 RN hours. The California average is 4.54.
My parent was hurt at Maple Healthcare Center. What should I do?
Get medical care first, then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman, ask for the chart in writing and keep notes and photos. For a free, confidential review of a possible case, call Beverly Law at (310) 552-6959.
Ask a question
Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.
Hurt at Maple Healthcare Center? — Beverly Law
If your loved one was hurt at Maple Healthcare Center, talk to a California elder abuse attorney. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.
Other nursing homes near Maple Healthcare Center
| Facility | City | Distance | CMS stars | Class AA/A | Federal G–L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Park Healthcare Center | Los Angeles | 0.1 mi | 1/5 | 4 | 10 |
| Alvarado Care Center | Los Angeles | 2.0 mi | 2/5 | 1 | 2 |
| Vernon Healthcare Center | Los Angeles | 2.0 mi | 1/5 | 3 | 4 |
| Alden Terrace Convalescent Hospital | Los Angeles | 2.0 mi | 5/5 | 0 | 1 |
| Olympia Convalescent Hospital | Los Angeles | 2.0 mi | 2/5 | 2 | 2 |
| Burlington Convalescent Hospital | Los Angeles | 2.1 mi | 4/5 | 1 | 1 |
Methodology and sources
We pulled this facility’s complaints, state enforcement actions and survey deficiencies from Cal Health Find for 2023 through October 30, 2026, downloaded the CDPH citation notices and CMS-2567 reports behind every Class AA or A citation and every federal deficiency at level G or higher, and wrote the summaries above from those documents. Facility details come from the CDPH licensing file and the CMS Provider Data Catalog. Residents are described only as the government documents describe them. See the methodology page to report an error; we review correction requests within five business days.
Sources
- Cal Health Find – Maple Healthcare Center
- Medicare Care Compare – Maple Healthcare Center
- CMS – Payroll-Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing (2026 Q2)
- CMS – Nursing home Provider Information (staffing, turnover)
- CMS – Nursing home Ownership
- CMS – Nursing home Penalties
- HCAI – Long-Term Care Facility Financial Data
- CDPH – State Enforcement Actions (open data)
- CMS Provider Data Catalog – Nursing homes
Important: This page reports findings from public records of the California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. A citation or deficiency is a regulatory finding by a government agency; it is not a court judgment and not proof of civil or criminal liability. Criminal defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. Lawsuit allegations are claims, not findings. This page is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with Beverly Law. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Data as of: October 30, 2026. Methodology and corrections.
☰ Contents