Beverly Law — Accident AttorneysBEVERLY LAW NURSING HOME ABUSE ATTORNEYS
NURSING HOME INSPECTION REPORT

Sunset Villa Post Acute in Long Beach: Inspection Record Review, Complaints and Abuse Reports (Updated October 30, 2026)

Beverly Law
Published by Beverly Law
3232 E Artesia Blvd, Long Beach · CDPH and CMS records · English y Español
Cal Health Find, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) database, lists 12 state citations for Sunset Villa Post Acute since 2023, including 0 Class AA and 5 Class A, and 7 federal deficiencies that inspectors rated at the actual-harm level or higher (G through L). The most serious state action was a Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000, issued July 31, 2026. The federal Medicare Care Compare site does not show its abuse icon for this facility as of our data date. Cal Health Find also lists 2 complaint or incident reports since 2023 that included a sexual abuse allegation; CDPH substantiated 0.

Is your loved one at Sunset Villa Post Acute?

If they fell, developed a bed sore, lost weight, were hurt or abused at Sunset Villa Post Acute, leave your name and phone. We call back today, request the chart and the full inspection file, and tell you plainly whether there is a case. Free, confidential, English or Spanish.

Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win

Sunset Villa Post Acute at a glance: owner, beds and ratings

Address
3232 E Artesia Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90805
CDPH license / facility ID
940000067 / 940000099
Medicare CCN
555375
Licensed beds
199
Licensee (CDPH)
LONG BEACH HEALTHCARE, LLC
Chain / affiliated entity (CMS)
PACS Group (chain or affiliated entity listed by CMS)
Administrator of record
McAleenan, Ryan M
CMS overall rating
1 of 5 stars
CMS staffing rating
3 of 5 stars
Nurse staffing (CMS)
3.97 reported nurse hours per resident per day*
CMS fines (last 3 years)
$223,775
CMS abuse icon
Not shown

* California separately requires at least 3.5 direct care service hours per patient day, counted under state rules, so the two numbers are not measured the same way.

Records: Cal Health Find ↗ · Medicare Care Compare ↗

↑ Back to contents

Sunset Villa Post Acute citations and inspection findings

Newest first. State citations come from CDPH; federal deficiencies come from the CMS-2567 inspection report CDPH writes for Medicare. Every row links to the government record.

DateSourceFindingRecord
July 31, 2026State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
June 9, 2026Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF678 – Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) , severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents)
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
June 2, 2026State (CDPH)Class B citation (Patient Rights), penalty $3,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
November 21, 2024State (CDPH)Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 9, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF697 – Pain Management, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 12, 2024State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
August 25, 2024State (CDPH)Class B citation (Other), penalty $3,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 26, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF692 – Nutrition/Hydration Status Maintenance, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 9, 2024State (CDPH)Administrative Penalty (DHPPD: 12 – 24 Days), penalty $50,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 5, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F610 – Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 9, 2024State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 9, 2024State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Record), penalty $25,100
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
Show 6 older findings
DateSourceFindingRecord
April 17, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF760 – Residents are Free of Significant Med Errors, severity K (immediate jeopardy, a pattern)
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
March 19, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), CertificationF697 – Pain Management, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F610 – Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F692 – Nutrition/Hydration Status Maintenance, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Abuse
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 18, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Abuse
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 12, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF610 – Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 20, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
March 24, 2023State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗

↑ Back to contents

What inspectors found at Sunset Villa Post Acute

Tap a finding to read the summary. Each one is written from the government report linked under it.

·
July 2026: Class A citation and F678 (severity J) after a delay in CPR for a resident found without a pulse

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on June 9, 2026, to investigate a complaint that a resident (Resident 1) fell late on June 5, 2026, and was pronounced dead shortly after midnight. The citation describes Resident 1 as a 64-year-old woman with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease), heart failure and blood clots. Her POLST form (written medical orders for end-of-life care) said CPR was required if she went into cardiopulmonary distress.

CDPH found that after the fall, Resident 1 declined a hospital transfer and was moved closer to the nursing station, with CNA 1 assigned to watch her. According to the citation, RN 1 found her unresponsive, without a pulse and not breathing at about 12:21 a.m. RN 1 told inspectors he left the room to call a code blue, get the crash cart and call 911. He said he did not ask CNA 1, who was in the room, for help and should have. CDPH found that RN 1 and CNA 1, both CPR certified, did not start CPR right away, and that other CPR-certified staff in the room did not start or help with CPR after the code blue. Inspectors also found the facility did not follow its CPR policy calling for a CPR team on each shift.

According to the citation, paramedics reached the bedside at 12:36 a.m. and continued CPR, and the paramedic run sheet listed the time of death as 12:52 a.m. CDPH determined these failures caused a delay in providing CPR to Resident 1. The department issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty, and the related federal survey cited F678 (cardio-pulmonary resuscitation) at severity J.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

October 2024: F697 (severity G) after a resident's pain went untreated following an unwitnessed fall

According to the 2567 report, Resident 1 was admitted on October 5, 2024, with a history of falls and a subdural hemorrhage (bleeding on the surface of the brain). She was nonverbal and needed help with transfers and daily care. On the morning of October 7, 2024, CNA 1 found her on the floor of her room, lying on her left side, after an unwitnessed fall. LVN 1, CNA 1 and CNA 2 put her back in bed.

Inspectors found that LVN 1 did not report the fall to Resident 1's physician, so no pain medication could be ordered, and did not do a post-fall assessment to check for injury or pain. According to the report, a physical therapist told LVN 1 that Resident 1 was screaming and guarding (protecting a painful area) her left hip during an evaluation, and LVN 1 did not tell the physician. When the resident's responsible party visited at 10:30 a.m., he found her screaming and grabbing her left hip and asked staff to call 911. Inspectors found LVN 1 also did not tell RNS 1, a nursing supervisor, about the fall.

The 2567 report states paramedics gave Resident 1 intravenous fentanyl (a strong pain medication) before moving her. At a hospital she was found to have a comminuted left intertrochanteric fracture (a hip break with the bone in several pieces) and had surgery. Inspectors found she had unrelieved pain for over two hours after she was found, and a delay in evaluation, treatment and transfer. The federal survey cited F697 (pain management) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

September 2024: Class A citation and F692 (severity G) after a resident's severe weight loss

According to the citation, CDPH received a complaint about Resident 1's weight loss on July 26, 2024, and made an unannounced visit the same day. The citation describes Resident 1 as an 81-year-old woman admitted in January 2024 with metabolic encephalopathy (a brain condition caused by illness elsewhere in the body) and type 2 diabetes. She had severe cognitive impairment. In March 2024 she had a short hospital stay for a right hip fracture.

CDPH found that Resident 1's weight dropped from 133.8 pounds on March 11, 2024, to 109.5 pounds on April 20, 2024, a loss of 24.3 pounds, or 18.2 percent, in 40 days. According to the citation, staff did not identify that she was eating less from March 16 to March 27, and nursing staff did not tell her physician she was refusing meals until April 1, 16 days later. CDPH found staff also did not follow the facility's unplanned weight loss protocol, the registered dietitian's recommendation to monitor her weight and intake, or her care plan, which called for notifying the physician and dietitian if she refused meals and lost significant weight. The 2567 report states nursing progress notes from March through April 1 had no documentation of her poor intake.

According to the citation, Resident 1 needed a gastrostomy tube (a feeding tube placed into the stomach) on May 6, 2024, and the failures placed her at risk for malnutrition and dehydration. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty, and the federal survey cited F692 (nutrition and hydration) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

May 2024: Class A citation and F697 (severity G) over unrelieved pain after a resident's hip fracture

According to the citation, CDPH identified this problem during a standard recertification survey in March 2024. The citation describes Resident 153 as an 81-year-old woman with severe cognitive impairment. On March 8, 2024, at 11:37 p.m., she complained of right hip pain, with moaning and tense, distressed body language. An X-ray reported on March 9 at 12:59 p.m. showed a displaced right hip fracture.

CDPH found the medication record for March 8 showed no pain assessment or pain medication, and the physician's order on March 9 was for Tylenol 325 milligrams, two tablets as needed, for mild pain. According to the citation, she was picked up for a hospital transfer at 10:24 p.m., more than 10 hours after the X-ray result reached the facility. She had hip replacement surgery (arthroplasty) at the hospital. After she returned, the only pain medication ordered from March 14 to 19 was the same Tylenol. On March 20 she told inspectors her pain was the most severe she had ever had.

CDPH determined licensed nurses did not accurately assess and reassess her pain, did not tell her physician the Tylenol was not working or that her pain was unmanageable as her care plan required, and did not follow the facility's pain policy, which called for checks every 30 to 60 minutes for acute pain. The department found she had pain rated 10 out of 10 for almost 24 hours before the transfer, and severe unrelieved pain again from March 14 to 19. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty, and the federal survey cited F697 (pain management) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

May 2024: Class A citation and F692 (severity G) over a resident's nutrition and weight monitoring

According to the citation, CDPH issued this Class A citation, listed under the category Patient Record, on May 9, 2024. The citation quotes the federal requirement on assisted nutrition and hydration. That rule says a facility must help each resident keep acceptable nutritional status, such as a usual or desirable body weight, offer enough fluids to stay hydrated, and provide a therapeutic diet when there is a nutritional problem and a provider orders one. The citation also quotes state and federal rules on written care plans, on promptly telling the physician about significant changes in a resident's condition, and on food and dietetic services.

In its findings, CDPH determined that the facility failed to ensure that Resident 41's care plan interventions to monitor weight, report significant changes to the physician and observe for signs of malnutrition were followed. The full narrative is in the linked report.

According to the citation, CDPH assessed a $25,000 penalty. The related federal survey, a standard recertification survey in March 2024, cited F692 (nutrition/hydration status maintenance) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

April 2024: F760 (severity K) after residents missed medication doses during a pharmacy change

According to the 2567 report, inspectors found that while the facility was switching to a new pharmacy provider, three of six sampled residents did not get their medications as their physicians ordered. Resident 1, who was prescribed clonazepam 1 milligram (a controlled medication), missed 23 doses between March 28 and April 14, 2024. Resident 2 missed four doses of a prescribed medication from April 3 to 8, and Resident 3 missed five doses of another prescribed medication from April 9 to 11.

Inspectors found the facility also did not tell the residents' physicians or the medical director about the missed doses, and could not determine how far the medication shortages reached other residents. The report states the missed doses placed the three residents at risk of withdrawal symptoms such as anxiety, insomnia, agitation and muscle aches. On April 24, 2024, inspectors called an Immediate Jeopardy (a finding that noncompliance has caused or is likely to cause serious harm) over Resident 1's missed clonazepam.

According to the 2567 report, the facility's Immediate Jeopardy removal plan included training licensed nurses on the new pharmacy's ordering and delivery process and on what to do when a medication is not available. It also included an investigation by the administrator into Resident 1's missed clonazepam doses and unexpected death, and three-way audits of eight medication carts with both pharmacies. Inspectors verified the plan and removed the Immediate Jeopardy on April 27, 2024. The federal survey cited F760 (significant medication errors) at severity K.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

October 2023: F600 (severity G) after a resident pushed another resident to the floor

According to the 2567 report, Resident 1 was admitted on October 5, 2023, from a hospital where he had been treated for aggressive behavior. Hospital records sent to the facility before admission said he had become physically assaultive, aggressive and agitated at another nursing facility and had threatened hospital staff.

Inspectors found that on October 9, 2023, Resident 2, a woman with dementia, asked Resident 1 to get up from her personal chair. Resident 1 became agitated and pushed her to the floor. She had skin tears (wounds where the skin is torn) on both arms and complained of a headache, and a physician ordered staff to watch the top of her head for a bump. LVN 2 told inspectors Resident 2 was "physically shaken up" and that she had not been told Resident 1 had a history of aggressive behavior. According to the report, a social services note a few days later said Resident 2 felt scared and worried about her safety.

The 2567 report states the facility failed to prevent physical abuse of Resident 2. Inspectors found staff did not monitor Resident 1's aggressive behavior, did not develop a care plan with interventions for it, and did not follow the facility's supervision and monitoring policy. The assistant director of nursing told inspectors a baseline care plan for his behaviors should have been created, and confirmed there was none until the day of the incident. The federal survey cited F600 (free from abuse and neglect) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

March 2023: Class A citation after a resident fell when a wheel came off her walker

According to the citation, CDPH received a facility-reported incident on September 8, 2022, and made an unannounced visit on September 21. The citation describes Resident 1 as a 91-year-old woman with intact decision-making who walked on her own with a four-wheel walker and needed only supervision. On September 6, 2022, while she was pushing her walker in the dining room, one of the front wheels came off, the walker tilted, and she fell with her right shoulder landing on the walker.

CDPH found she was sent to a hospital, where an X-ray showed a displaced fracture of the right collar bone (clavicle), and her arm was placed in a sling. When she returned, a physical therapist found she could no longer move around as independently as before. She told inspectors she was frustrated because she now had to call for help to do things she used to do herself. According to the citation, her restorative nursing program (care to keep up her strength and function) was put on hold until the fracture healed.

According to the citation, the director of maintenance told inspectors the walker had never been inspected or maintained before the fall, and that the facility knew she had it but never checked the safety of residents' personal walkers. CDPH determined the facility failed to keep the walker in working condition as its own policy on personal equipment required, which led to the fall, the fracture and a decline in her function and mobility. The department issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

↑ Back to contents

Complaints against Sunset Villa Post Acute

YearIntakesComplaintsFacility-reported incidentsSubstantiated (at least one allegation)
202337221514
202455441117
20253030013
2026262333

Cal Health Find lists 148 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes for this facility from 2023 through October 30, 2026. CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 47 of them. 43 intakes involved an allegation in CDPH’s abuse category, and 8 of those had an abuse allegation substantiated. An intake can contain several allegations; “unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence, not that nothing happened.

↑ Back to contents

Sexual abuse reports at Sunset Villa Post Acute

Cal Health Find lists 2 intakes for Sunset Villa Post Acute from 2023 through October 30, 2026 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse (0 from complaints and 2 reported by the facility itself). CDPH substantiated a sexual abuse allegation in 0 of them. Federal rules require a nursing home to report an abuse allegation to the state within two hours, so a facility-reported incident means staff raised the allegation, not that it was proven. “Unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence; it does not mean nothing happened.

YearIntakes with a sexual abuse allegationSubstantiated
202310
202410

Warning signs include bruising or bleeding in the genital area or inner thighs, a new genital infection, torn or stained underclothing, and a resident who suddenly fears a particular staff member or resists being bathed or changed. If you suspect sexual abuse, call 911 or local police first, ask that the resident not be bathed before a medical exam, and then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman. Sexual abuse reports at Los Angeles County nursing homes →

↑ Back to contents

Staffing at Sunset Villa Post Acute

Payroll records Sunset Villa Post Acute filed with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for April through June 2026 show an average of 3.97 nursing hours per resident per day, counting registered nurses (RNs), licensed vocational nurses and nurse aides. The California average CMS published for the same period is 4.54, and the Los Angeles County median is 4.32. RN time averaged 0.27 hours per resident per day (California average 0.68). Staffing averaged 3.68 hours on weekends and 4.08 on weekdays.

CMS reports nursing staff turnover of 41.2% at this facility (California average 36.6%) and RN turnover of 18.2% (California average 37.8%).

California requires most skilled nursing facilities to provide at least 3.5 direct care hours per patient day (Health and Safety Code section 1276.65). Counting the RN, LVN and nurse aide hours in the same payroll data, Sunset Villa Post Acute was below 3.5 on 2 of 91 days. This is our calculation from CMS data, not a CDPH finding: CDPH counts some staff differently (for example psychiatric technicians in special treatment programs) and can grant waivers.

Sunset Villa Post AcuteLA County medianCalifornia average
Total nursing hours per resident per day3.974.324.54
RN hours per resident per day0.270.460.68
Weekend nursing hours per resident per day3.683.894.10
Nursing staff turnover41.2%34.1%36.6%

Compare staffing, profits and fines across Los Angeles County nursing homes →

↑ Back to contents

Who owns Sunset Villa Post Acute

The owners and operators below are listed for Sunset Villa Post Acute in the federal CMS nursing home ownership file (data as of October 1, 2026). CMS requires each Medicare-certified nursing home to report anyone with a 5% or greater ownership stake and anyone with operational or managerial control.

Owner or operatorRoleShareSince
Ryan McAleenanOperational or managerial control–March 1, 2023

In its annual report to the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) for the year ending December 31, 2025, the facility listed $1.9 million in payments to related companies (businesses that share owners or management with the facility): $1.9 million to PACS for support services. Payments to related companies are legal; California requires nursing homes to disclose them.

↑ Back to contents

Sunset Villa Post Acute finances

Sunset Villa Post Acute reported $35.6 million in health care revenue and net income of $4.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2025, a margin of 11.3%, in its annual financial report to HCAI (as submitted; HCAI has not finished reviewing it). The median operating margin that year was 5.9% for Los Angeles County nursing homes and 6.1% statewide. Medi-Cal paid for 70% of resident days. Salaries for RNs, LVNs and nurse aides came to $8.4 million.

YearRevenueNet incomeMarginOccupancyMedi-Cal days
2023*$22.1 million$2.0 million9.1%90%–
2024$30.2 million$1.2 million4.1%90%74%
2025$35.6 million$4.0 million11.3%91%70%

* More than one report was filed that year, usually after a change of ownership; the table shows the longest reporting period.

↑ Back to contents

Federal fines and penalties: Sunset Villa Post Acute

CMS lists 4 federal fines totaling $223,775 and 2 Medicare payment denials for Sunset Villa Post Acute in the roughly three years its penalty file covers.

DatePenaltyAmount or length
May 27, 2026Fine$16,569
October 10, 2024Fine$14,050
July 5, 2024Fine$56,584
July 5, 2024Payment denial7 days
February 21, 2024Fine$136,572
February 21, 2024Payment denial55 days

↑ Back to contents

Sunset Villa Post Acute lawsuits and criminal cases

We searched California Attorney General and Los Angeles County District Attorney announcements and news coverage for Sunset Villa Post Acute and its licensee and found no public criminal case or civil lawsuit we could tie to this facility as of October 30, 2026. Many civil cases settle quietly or are not covered by the press, so this is not a complete court search.

↑ Back to contents

What this record means for your family

California uses classes for state citations. Under Health and Safety Code section 1424 ↗, a Class AA citation is a Class A violation that CDPH determined was a direct proximate cause of a resident’s death. A Class A citation means CDPH found an imminent danger, or a substantial probability, that death or serious physical harm would result. Class B covers violations with a direct or immediate relationship to residents’ health, safety or security.

Federal deficiencies carry a letter from A to L. G, H and I mean inspectors found actual harm to residents; J, K and L mean immediate jeopardy, the most serious level. F600 is the federal rule that residents be free from abuse and neglect; F609 and F610 cover reporting and investigating allegations; F689 covers accidents and supervision; F686 covers pressure injuries.

Warning signs worth asking about: unexplained bruises or fractures, new bed sores, sudden weight loss or dehydration, a resident who becomes fearful or withdrawn around certain staff, and calls that go unanswered.

↑ Back to contents

What to do now

Free nursing home case review

We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

No fees or costs unless we win

↑ Back to contents

Questions families ask

Has Sunset Villa Post Acute been cited by the State of California?

Cal Health Find lists 12 state citations for Sunset Villa Post Acute since 2023, including 0 Class AA and 5 Class A. Each one is listed in the timeline above with a link to the CDPH record.

How many complaints have been filed against Sunset Villa Post Acute?

From 2023 through October 30, 2026, Cal Health Find lists 148 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes, and CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 47 of them.

Does Medicare flag Sunset Villa Post Acute for abuse?

As of our data date, Medicare Care Compare does not show its abuse icon for Sunset Villa Post Acute. The icon is only one signal; read the citations above.

Have there been sexual abuse reports at Sunset Villa Post Acute?

Cal Health Find lists 2 complaint or facility-reported incident intakes at Sunset Villa Post Acute since 2023 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse, and CDPH substantiated 0. The section above breaks them down by year.

Where can I read reviews and complaints about Sunset Villa Post Acute?

Online reviews are opinions. The official record is the state and federal inspection file: this page summarizes it and links each citation, complaint outcome and inspection report on Cal Health Find and Medicare Care Compare, so you can read the source yourself.

How many beds does Sunset Villa Post Acute have?

Sunset Villa Post Acute is licensed by CDPH for 199 beds and has a CMS overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

Who owns or operates Sunset Villa Post Acute?

CDPH lists the licensee as LONG BEACH HEALTHCARE, LLC. CMS lists the facility under the chain or affiliated entity PACS Group. The CMS ownership file lists McAleenan, Ryan among the owners or operators. The full list is in the ownership section of this page.

How many nursing hours does Sunset Villa Post Acute provide per resident?

Payroll data the facility filed with CMS for April through June 2026 show 3.97 total nursing hours per resident per day, including 0.27 RN hours. The California average is 4.54.

My parent was hurt at Sunset Villa Post Acute. What should I do?

Get medical care first, then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman, ask for the chart in writing and keep notes and photos. For a free, confidential review of a possible case, call Beverly Law at (310) 552-6959.

Ask a question

Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.

BEVERLY LAW · NURSING HOME ABUSE ATTORNEYS

Hurt at Sunset Villa Post Acute? — Beverly Law

If your loved one was hurt at Sunset Villa Post Acute, talk to a California elder abuse attorney. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

✓Free consultation✓No fees or costs unless we win✓English y Español✓Available 24/7

↑ Back to contents

Other nursing homes near Sunset Villa Post Acute

FacilityCityDistanceCMS starsClass AA/AFederal G–L
Bay Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLong Beach0.8 mi2/523
Rose Villa Healthcare CenterBellflower0.8 mi3/500
LA Paz Geropsychiatric CenterParamount1.4 mi2/511
Bellflower Post AcuteBellflower1.6 mi2/511
Meadow Creek Post-AcuteParamount1.6 mi1/512
Paramount Convalescent HospitalParamount2.0 mi3/512

↑ Back to contents

Methodology and sources

We pulled this facility’s complaints, state enforcement actions and survey deficiencies from Cal Health Find for 2023 through October 30, 2026, downloaded the CDPH citation notices and CMS-2567 reports behind every Class AA or A citation and every federal deficiency at level G or higher, and wrote the summaries above from those documents. Facility details come from the CDPH licensing file and the CMS Provider Data Catalog. Residents are described only as the government documents describe them. See the methodology page to report an error; we review correction requests within five business days.

Sources

  1. Cal Health Find – Sunset Villa Post Acute
  2. Medicare Care Compare – Sunset Villa Post Acute
  3. CMS – Payroll-Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing (2026 Q2)
  4. CMS – Nursing home Provider Information (staffing, turnover)
  5. CMS – Nursing home Ownership
  6. CMS – Nursing home Penalties
  7. HCAI – Long-Term Care Facility Financial Data
  8. CDPH – State Enforcement Actions (open data)
  9. CMS Provider Data Catalog – Nursing homes

Important: This page reports findings from public records of the California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. A citation or deficiency is a regulatory finding by a government agency; it is not a court judgment and not proof of civil or criminal liability. Criminal defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. Lawsuit allegations are claims, not findings. This page is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with Beverly Law. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Data as of: October 30, 2026. Methodology and corrections.

↑ Back to contents

☰ Contents
×

Free nursing home case review

We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

No fees or costs unless we win
© 2026 Beverly Law. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Free consultation
No fees or costs unless we win
Call Now · 24/7
4.8 out of 5 · 604 Google reviews
Skip to content