Is your loved one at Ararat Nursing Facility?
If they fell, developed a bed sore, lost weight, were hurt or abused at Ararat Nursing Facility, leave your name and phone. We call back today, request the chart and the full inspection file, and tell you plainly whether there is a case. Free, confidential, English or Spanish.
Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win
Ararat Nursing Facility at a glance: owner, beds and ratings
* California separately requires at least 3.5 direct care service hours per patient day, counted under state rules, so the two numbers are not measured the same way.
Records: Cal Health Find ↗ · Medicare Care Compare ↗
Ararat Nursing Facility citations and inspection findings
Newest first. State citations come from CDPH; federal deficiencies come from the CMS-2567 inspection report CDPH writes for Medicare. Every row links to the government record.
| Date | Source | Finding | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| September 17, 2026 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 21, 2026 | State (CDPH) | Class A Trebled citation (Patient Care), penalty $60,000 Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| July 24, 2026 | State (CDPH) | Class A Trebled citation (Medication), penalty $60,000 Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| July 9, 2026 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Falls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 10, 2026 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F760 – Residents are Free of Significant Med Errors, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| March 20, 2026 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Rights), penalty $20,000 Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| January 28, 2026 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) F604 – Right to be Free from Physical Restraints, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) F610 – Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| November 21, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class A Trebled citation (Patient Care), penalty $75,000 Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| October 17, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000 Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| September 16, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B Trebled citation (Patient Rights), penalty $9,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| September 9, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 29, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000 Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
Show 22 older findings
| Date | Source | Finding | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| August 29, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000 Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 13, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000 Sexual abuse allegation › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 1, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Abuse Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| July 14, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Certification | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| July 3, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| July 3, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 20, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) AbuseSexual abuse allegation › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| May 20, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| May 6, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Patient Rights), penalty $3,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| March 25, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Abuse Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| March 25, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class A Trebled citation (Patient Care), penalty $75,000 Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| February 6, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Falls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| December 26, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000 Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| November 12, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Falls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| September 19, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 5, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Certification | F726 – Competent Nursing Staff, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) F688 – Increase/Prevent Decrease in ROM/Mobility, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| July 31, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class AA citation (Patient Care), penalty $120,000, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 28, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class AA citation (Patient Care), penalty $90,000, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 6, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) AbuseFalls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| May 7, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F684 – Quality of Care, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 1, 2023 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Rights), penalty $20,000, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| March 17, 2023 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) F656 – Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Falls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
What inspectors found at Ararat Nursing Facility
Tap a finding to read the summary. Each one is written from the government report linked under it.
August 2026: Class A citation (penalty trebled) and F689 (severity G) after a resident fell from bed during a brief change
According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on July 9, 2026 to investigate a facility-reported incident. CDPH found that on June 26, 2026, Resident 1, a 97-year-old man with dementia and a history of falls who took a blood thinner and depended on staff for mobility and daily care, fell from his bed while CNA 1 changed his disposable brief by herself. He reached for his eyeglasses on the bedside table, and his head struck the corner of the table. He had a 1 cm by 1 cm cut on the top of his scalp and was sent to an acute care hospital, where a CT scan showed bilateral acute on chronic subdural hematomas (new bleeding on top of older collections of blood between the brain and the skull, on both sides of the head).
Inspectors found that his assessment called for two-person assistance, yet the facility did not ensure two or more staff helped turn him in bed. The department determined the facility also failed to identify his need for two-person help given his fall risk, his bleeding risk from the anticoagulant, his dependence on staff and his dementia, and failed to follow its own fall management program, which required reassessing how many staff a resident needs. According to the 2567 report, a restorative nursing assistant told inspectors the resident needed two-person assistance, while CNA 2 said he changed the resident's brief without help.
CDPH found these failures violated state and federal requirements and issued a Class A citation with a $20,000 penalty that was trebled to $60,000. The federal 2567 report cites F689 (free of accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity G.
July 2026: Class A citation (penalty trebled) and F760 (severity G) after a blood thinner was not resumed as ordered
CDPH found that Resident 1, a 97-year-old woman with chronic atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that can lead to blood clots) and a prosthetic heart valve, was admitted on May 27, 2026 with a hospital order for apixaban (a blood thinner) 2.5 mg twice a day. According to the citation, the physician ordered staff to skip that night's dose because of a nosebleed. The physician told inspectors he did not discontinue the medication and that stopping it may lead to a stroke.
Inspectors found that RN 1 did not resume the apixaban on May 28 as the physician ordered. The medication administration record had no order for the drug, and a licensed vocational nurse documented that it was no longer on the resident's medication list. CDPH found the resident missed six doses from May 28 through June 1 and that the facility did not follow its policy on physician orders. On the morning of June 1, a CNA noticed the resident leaning to her left side during a transfer. A nurse found left-side facial drooping, left-side weakness and slurred speech, and the facility called 911. At an acute care hospital she was diagnosed with an acute ischemic stroke (a sudden loss of blood flow to part of the brain) due to a blockage of the right middle cerebral artery.
According to the citation, CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $20,000 penalty that was trebled to $60,000. The 2567 report states the facility failed to keep the resident free of significant medication errors and cites F760 at severity G.
March 2026: Class A citation and F604 (severity J), F609 (severity D) and F610 (severity D) after a resident's hands were found tied with a scarf
CDPH found that on January 14, 2026, at about 3 a.m., LVN 1 found the hands of Resident 1, an 82-year-old woman with dementia and Alzheimer's disease who depended on staff for care, tied firmly together at the wrists with a scarf while she lay in bed. According to the citation, she had no way to move or free her hands. On entering the room, the nurse saw her twisting her body to show that her hands were bound.
Inspectors found that no licensed nurse assessed the resident before a physical restraint was applied, as the facility's restraint policy required. CDPH found that CNA 1, the aide assigned to the resident, was suspected of tying her hands and was seen sleeping during the shift, yet stayed on the schedule and kept caring for her until clocking out at 7:16 a.m. The department determined this went against the facility's abuse prevention policy, which calls for suspending accused staff during an investigation, and allowed the potential for further abuse. According to the citation, the restraint created a risk of injury and of feelings of hopelessness, helplessness and humiliation.
The 2567 report states inspectors called an immediate jeopardy (a situation likely to cause serious harm) on February 3, 2026 and removed it on February 4 after the facility carried out an accepted removal plan, which included suspending CNA 1 on the morning of January 14 pending a human resources investigation. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $20,000 penalty. The federal report cites F604 (right to be free from physical restraints) at severity J, and F609 (reporting of alleged violations) and F610 (investigating, preventing and correcting alleged violations) at severity D.
November 2025: Class A citation (penalty trebled) after a resident fell walking to the bathroom without a walker
According to the citation, CDPH visited the facility on October 6, 2025 to investigate a facility-reported incident involving a resident who broke a bone. CDPH found that Resident 1, a 93-year-old woman with dementia, blindness in her right eye and macular degeneration (an eye disease that affects central vision) in her left eye, had been assessed as high risk for falls. She also had a prior fall, took medications linked to a higher fall risk, and needed moderate staff help with toilet transfers and moving around.
Inspectors found that on September 30, 2025, the facility did not supervise Resident 1 and did not give her a front-wheeled walker when she walked to the bathroom. Her care plan called for supervision when she stood up and got in and out of bed, and a physical therapy discharge summary recommended an assistive device for safe mobility. According to the citation, she fell that morning at 7:53 a.m. and was found on the floor of her room, sitting against the wall. She sustained a left femoral intertrochanteric fracture (a break in the upper part of the left thigh bone) and was sent to an acute care hospital for evaluation and treatment.
The department determined the facility failed to keep the resident free from accidents and to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent them. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty that was trebled to $75,000.
August 2025: Class A citation and F600 (severity G) and F609 (severity D) after a resident hit another resident with a cane
According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on July 14, 2025 for the annual recertification survey and to look into a facility-reported altercation between residents. CDPH found that on June 28, 2025, at 2:45 p.m., a CNA saw Resident 45 come out of his room and hit Resident 224 several times on the head and right leg with a single-point cane. Resident 224, a 90-year-old man with Alzheimer's disease and dementia, was sitting in his wheelchair in the hallway and yelling at the time.
Inspectors found that the facility failed to protect Resident 224's right to be free from physical abuse. According to the citation, he had bruising and swelling on his right leg from blunt force, redness on top of his head and mild pain rated two out of 10. He reported a mild headache and was given Tylenol, and progress notes over the next two days still showed bruising on the leg. The 2567 report states the CNA saw Resident 45, an 85-year-old man with Alzheimer's disease and dementia, become agitated at Resident 224's yelling before the incident, and a care plan started that day noted impulsive behavior and physical aggression toward the other resident.
CDPH found these facts supported a Class A citation and assessed a $25,000 penalty. The federal 2567 report cites F600 (free from abuse and neglect) at severity G and F609 (reporting of alleged violations) at severity D. The full narrative on the reporting finding is in the linked report.
August 2025: Class A citation and F600 (severity J) after a resident-to-resident sexual abuse incident
According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on June 20, 2025 to investigate a complaint and a facility-reported incident of sexual abuse. CDPH found that at about 4:50 a.m. that day, a CNA and a licensed vocational nurse saw Resident 2 topless and leaning over Resident 1, her roommate, who was lying in bed. Resident 2 was rubbing her bare breasts against Resident 1's chest and sucking her chin, which left a red mark. Resident 1 was an 80-year-old woman with dementia and moderately impaired thinking.
Inspectors found the facility failed to identify the risk that Resident 2's sexually inappropriate behavior posed to other residents, and failed to make sure licensed staff monitored and documented that behavior and put protective interventions in place. A 2024 care plan had already documented that behavior. CDPH found the facility also did not evaluate whether Resident 1 could consent to sexual activity, and did not assess and document her condition for possible injuries for 72 hours afterward as its abuse policy required. According to the citation, Resident 1 appeared panicked and in shock during the incident, and afterward she refused help with changing, became agitated and began shaking.
The 2567 report states inspectors called an immediate jeopardy (a situation likely to cause serious harm) on June 25, 2025 and removed it on June 27 after the facility carried out an accepted removal plan. Under that plan, staff separated the two residents and provided one-on-one supervision, and Resident 2 was sent to an acute care hospital for a psychological evaluation. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty, and the federal report cites F600 (free from abuse and neglect) at severity J.
August 2025: F600 (severity G) after a resident threw a cup at his roommate
The 2567 report states that on July 25, 2025, at about 2:30 p.m., Resident 2 threw a four-ounce cup of thickened flavored water at his roommate, Resident 1, inside their shared room. The cup hit Resident 1 on the left lower lip and left a 3 cm scratch that bled and needed first aid. Inspectors found that Resident 1 had a history of stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), had moderately impaired thinking and depended on staff for much of his daily care.
Inspectors found that a CNA went into the room after hearing the two residents shouting and saw blood on Resident 1's lip, and Resident 2 admitted throwing the cup. The two residents gave different accounts of how the argument started. Resident 1 said he had asked Resident 2 to lower the television volume, and Resident 2 said Resident 1 had used profanity toward him. A licensed vocational nurse told inspectors Resident 2 said he threw the cup to scare his roommate, and she described the incident as physical abuse. Staff cleaned the scratch, left it open to air, and placed Resident 1 on monitoring for skin changes and signs of emotional distress.
CDPH found the facility failed to protect Resident 1's right to be free from physical abuse while under the facility's care. The 2567 report cites F600 (free from abuse and neglect) at severity G.
March 2025: F600 (severity G) after a resident scratched another resident's nose in the dining room
CDPH found that on March 12, 2025, at about 5:45 p.m., staff heard a loud argument and yelling between two residents in the dining area. According to the 2567 report, Resident 2 scratched Resident 1 on the upper right side of her nose during a physical altercation, and the scratch bled. Resident 1 had dementia, Alzheimer's disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term lung disease), used a manual wheelchair and had moderately impaired decision-making.
Inspectors found that Resident 1 rated her pain at four out of 10 and was given acetaminophen. A physician ordered staff to clean the scratch, apply antibiotic ointment and cover it twice a day for ten days. At a care conference the next day, Resident 1 said Resident 2, who was also in a wheelchair, had been hitting and bumping into her wheelchair in the dining room and then scratched her face. The report states Resident 2 also had dementia and Alzheimer's disease and did not have the capacity to make decisions.
CDPH found the facility failed to protect Resident 1's right to be free from physical abuse. The report notes that a person with impaired cognition who is subjected to physical abuse may experience pain and feelings of hopelessness, helplessness and humiliation. The 2567 report cites F600 (free from abuse and neglect) at severity G.
March 2025: Class A citation (penalty trebled) and F689 (severity G) after a fall during a shower transfer
According to the citation, CDPH visited on February 6, 2025 to investigate a facility-reported fracture. CDPH found that Resident 3, a 97-year-old woman with Alzheimer's disease, dementia and osteoporosis (weak, brittle bones), was at high risk for falls, depended on staff for all transfers and, under her care plan, needed two staff members at all times.
Inspectors found that on January 24, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., CNA 1 transferred Resident 3 alone from her wheelchair to the shower bench, without the mechanical lift and second staff member her care required. Progress notes state she became agitated and pushed the CNA during the transfer. She fell from the wheelchair and hit her right knee on the shower bench. CDPH found that CNA 1 then moved her from the shower room floor to the wheelchair before a registered nurse had checked her for injuries. By that evening her right lower leg was discolored and swollen, with pain at nine out of 10. An X-ray showed a mildly displaced avulsion fracture (a small piece of bone pulled away where a tendon attaches) at the top of the shinbone below the knee. She was given pain medication and sent to an acute care hospital the next day.
The department determined the facility did not keep the resident free from falls and injury in line with her care plan. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty that was trebled to $75,000. The federal 2567 report cites F689 (free of accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity G.
December 2024: Class A citation and F689 (severity G) after a resident fell walking to the bathroom and fractured her thigh bone
According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on November 12, 2024 to investigate a facility-reported fall. CDPH found that Resident 1, a 91-year-old woman with dementia, Alzheimer's disease and general muscle weakness, was a high fall risk with unsteady balance, needed a walker and needed supervision or light hands-on help when walking.
Inspectors found the facility did not provide an assistive device for safe walking and did not follow its "Falling Star Program" policy, which calls for posting a high-fall-risk resident's name on bright yellow paper by the room door so staff know the risk. On October 29, 2024, at 7:08 a.m., she fell while walking to the bathroom alone and without a walker. A restorative nursing assistant reported that she was found on the floor beside her bed, and a nurse found her lying on her back with a cut on the back of her head and unable to move her left leg. At an acute care hospital she was diagnosed with a displaced fracture of the upper left thigh bone and had surgery to place a metal rod in the bone. According to the citation, a CNA told inspectors the resident was not identified as a fall risk because her name on the door was not highlighted in yellow.
CDPH found the facility failed to prevent the fall and injury and issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty. The federal 2567 report cites F689 (free of accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity G.
August 2024: F726 (severity G) and F688 (severity G) on staff competency and range-of-motion care
The 2567 report from an August 2024 certification survey states the facility did not ensure its registered nurses and restorative nursing assistants (aides who help residents keep joint movement and function) were competent to assess and care for residents with limited range of motion. Inspectors found that six registered nurses, including the director of nursing, who performed joint mobility assessments had no competency evaluations for that task. Several restorative nursing assistants had no competency evaluations for range-of-motion exercises, splints and walking assistance, and others were evaluated by someone not qualified to do so. The director of nursing told inspectors there was no way to ensure the assessments were accurate.
CDPH found these failures affected four sampled residents. Resident 119, who had Alzheimer's disease and dementia and depended on staff for all care, had undetected worsening contractures (shortening and stiffening of muscles and tendons that limits joint movement) in both elbows and knees and developed new contractures in both hands and hips. Inspectors found staff did not check the fit of the resident's elbow and knee splints during several assessments from 2022 to 2024, did not report a significant decline in August 2024, missed ordered passive range-of-motion exercises for both hands on one day, put the right elbow splint on upside down, and did not notice that the right knee splint had been out of line with the knee for at least two weeks.
Based on these findings, the 2567 report states the facility did not meet two federal requirements: F726 (competent nursing staff) and F688 (increase or prevent decrease in range of motion and mobility), both cited at severity G.
July 2024: Class AA citation and F600 (severity J) and F689 (severity J) after a fall during a mechanical lift weigh-in
According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on June 6, 2024 to investigate an allegation of a resident death. CDPH found that Resident 1, an elderly woman with parkinsonism (a brain condition that causes slowed movement, stiffness and tremors), Alzheimer's disease, dementia and osteoporosis, had severely impaired thinking, was at high risk for falls and depended on staff for all daily care.
Inspectors found that on June 1, 2024, at about 11 a.m., CNA 1 brought a mechanical lift into the resident's room alone to weigh her, although two staff members were required. After placing the sling under the resident, CNA 1 left her unattended to find another staff member. CDPH found the CNA did not follow the resident's care plan, which called for keeping her surroundings free of hazards because of her tremors and involuntary movements, and that the resident had no physician's order for the lift as facility policy required. The resident fell and her face landed on the base of the lift. At an acute care hospital she was found to have multiple facial fractures, and according to the citation she died there due to the extent of injuries related to the fall.
The 2567 report states inspectors called an immediate jeopardy on June 13, 2024 and removed it the next day after the facility carried out an accepted removal plan. Under that plan, CNA 1 was suspended the day of the fall and later terminated, and staff were trained that two people must be present when using a lift. CDPH issued a Class AA citation with a $120,000 penalty. The federal report cites F600 (free from abuse and neglect) and F689 (free of accident hazards, supervision and devices), both at severity J.
June 2024: Class AA citation and F684 (severity J) after a resident on aspiration precautions was fed by a family member without staff present
According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on May 7, 2024 to investigate an allegation of a resident death. CDPH found that Resident 1, a 91-year-old woman with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Alzheimer's disease and parkinsonism, was on aspiration precautions (steps to keep food or liquid out of her airway).
Inspectors found that on March 9, 2024, at 5:30 p.m., staff allowed a family member to help Resident 1 eat dinner on a dining room patio with no staff present to monitor her. CDPH found the facility had not trained the family member first, did not provide a restorative nursing assistant to help her eat, and did not have a care plan specific to her needs. At 5:45 p.m., the family member saw she was unresponsive, and a licensed vocational nurse found her without a pulse and not breathing. Paramedics took her to an acute care hospital, where, according to the citation, she died on March 13 with diagnoses including aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection from food or liquid breathed into the lungs), cardiac arrest and anoxic brain injury (brain damage from lack of oxygen).
The 2567 report states the family members of three other residents also had not been trained before helping with meals. Inspectors called an immediate jeopardy on May 14, 2024 and removed it on May 15 after the facility educated families on safe feeding and required visitors to sign a feeding precautions form and feed residents under staff supervision. CDPH issued a Class AA citation with a $120,000 penalty; the state's record lists the final amount as $90,000. The federal report cites F684 (quality of care) at severity J.
June 2023: Class A citation and F689 (severity G) and F656 (severity G) after a resident fell from her wheelchair
According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on March 17, 2023 to investigate a complaint about quality of care. CDPH found that Resident 1, a 95-year-old woman with Alzheimer's disease and heart disease, could not walk, used a wheelchair and was at high risk for falls. A physical therapist had identified abnormal posture, and her fall care plan listed abnormal posture as a problem without describing it or setting specific interventions for it.
Inspectors found the facility did not give Resident 1 postural support in her wheelchair. Her antipsychotic medication, Risperdal, had been ordered for constant attempts to get out of bed and her wheelchair, and it was stopped on February 11, 2023 with instructions to use non-drug interventions. CDPH found that staff did not monitor her afterward for restlessness, rocking back and forth, leaning forward and attempts to get up, and did not provide non-drug interventions, even though several staff described these behaviors. On March 11, 2023, at 3:30 p.m., she fell out of her wheelchair face first. She stayed at the facility, and at 8 a.m. the next day staff found her unresponsive. At an acute care hospital she was diagnosed with facial bone fractures and extensive intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding inside the skull). According to the citation, she died on March 13, 2023.
CDPH found the facility failed to develop and carry out a care plan that met her needs. It issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty, and the state's record lists the final amount as $20,000. The federal 2567 report cites F689 (free of accident hazards, supervision and devices) and F656 (develop and implement a comprehensive care plan), both at severity G.
Complaints against Ararat Nursing Facility
| Year | Intakes | Complaints | Facility-reported incidents | Substantiated (at least one allegation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 7 |
| 2024 | 40 | 11 | 29 | 13 |
| 2025 | 110 | 18 | 92 | 32 |
| 2026 | 40 | 16 | 24 | 5 |
Cal Health Find lists 208 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes for this facility from 2023 through October 30, 2026. CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 57 of them. 45 intakes involved an allegation in CDPH’s abuse category, and 11 of those had an abuse allegation substantiated. An intake can contain several allegations; “unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence, not that nothing happened.
Sexual abuse reports at Ararat Nursing Facility
Cal Health Find lists 2 intakes for Ararat Nursing Facility from 2023 through October 30, 2026 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse (1 from complaints and 1 reported by the facility itself). CDPH substantiated a sexual abuse allegation in 2 of them. Federal rules require a nursing home to report an abuse allegation to the state within two hours, so a facility-reported incident means staff raised the allegation, not that it was proven. “Unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence; it does not mean nothing happened.
| Year | Intakes with a sexual abuse allegation | Substantiated |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2 | 2 |
Cited findings on this page whose government reports describe a sexual abuse allegation: August 2025: Class A citation and F600 (severity J) after a resident-to-resident sexual abuse incident
Warning signs include bruising or bleeding in the genital area or inner thighs, a new genital infection, torn or stained underclothing, and a resident who suddenly fears a particular staff member or resists being bathed or changed. If you suspect sexual abuse, call 911 or local police first, ask that the resident not be bathed before a medical exam, and then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman. Sexual abuse reports at Los Angeles County nursing homes →
Staffing at Ararat Nursing Facility
Payroll records Ararat Nursing Facility filed with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for April through June 2026 show an average of 5.03 nursing hours per resident per day, counting registered nurses (RNs), licensed vocational nurses and nurse aides. The California average CMS published for the same period is 4.54, and the Los Angeles County median is 4.32. RN time averaged 0.51 hours per resident per day (California average 0.68). Staffing averaged 4.38 hours on weekends and 5.29 on weekdays.
CMS reports nursing staff turnover of 42.7% at this facility (California average 36.6%) and RN turnover of 39.4% (California average 37.8%).
California requires most skilled nursing facilities to provide at least 3.5 direct care hours per patient day (Health and Safety Code section 1276.65). Counting the RN, LVN and nurse aide hours in the same payroll data, Ararat Nursing Facility was below 3.5 on 0 of 91 days. This is our calculation from CMS data, not a CDPH finding: CDPH counts some staff differently (for example psychiatric technicians in special treatment programs) and can grant waivers.
| Ararat Nursing Facility | LA County median | California average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total nursing hours per resident per day | 5.03 | 4.32 | 4.54 |
| RN hours per resident per day | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.68 |
| Weekend nursing hours per resident per day | 4.38 | 3.89 | 4.10 |
| Nursing staff turnover | 42.7% | 34.1% | 36.6% |
Compare staffing, profits and fines across Los Angeles County nursing homes →
Who owns Ararat Nursing Facility
The owners and operators below are listed for Ararat Nursing Facility in the federal CMS nursing home ownership file (data as of October 1, 2026). CMS requires each Medicare-certified nursing home to report anyone with a 5% or greater ownership stake and anyone with operational or managerial control.
| Owner or operator | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ararat Home of Los Angeles Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership | 100% | December 1, 1993 |
| Derik Ghookasian | Operational or managerial control | – | November 23, 2006 |
| Walter Hekimian | Operational or managerial control | – | March 3, 2025 |
| James Michail | Operational or managerial control | – | June 11, 2024 |
Ararat Nursing Facility finances
Ararat Nursing Facility reported $37.9 million in health care revenue and net income of $32,985 for the year ending December 31, 2025, a margin of 0.1%, in its annual financial report to HCAI (as submitted; HCAI has not finished reviewing it). The median operating margin that year was 5.9% for Los Angeles County nursing homes and 6.1% statewide. Medi-Cal paid for 83% of resident days. Salaries for RNs, LVNs and nurse aides came to $13.1 million.
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Occupancy | Medi-Cal days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $33.1 million | $1.9 million | 5.6% | 96% | – |
| 2024 | $33.8 million | $630,944 | 1.9% | 95% | 0% |
| 2025 | $37.9 million | $32,985 | 0.1% | 95% | 83% |
Federal fines and penalties: Ararat Nursing Facility
CMS lists Ararat Nursing Facility as a candidate for its Special Focus Facility program. CMS created the program for nursing homes with a history of serious quality problems; candidates are facilities whose inspection record qualifies them, and states choose which ones enter the program for closer oversight.
CMS lists 8 federal fines totaling $426,785 and 4 Medicare payment denials for Ararat Nursing Facility in the roughly three years its penalty file covers.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 10, 2026 | Fine | $19,610 |
| May 21, 2026 | Fine | $19,610 |
| February 4, 2026 | Fine | $17,345 |
| February 4, 2026 | Payment denial | 14 days |
| July 18, 2025 | Fine | $100,816 |
| May 21, 2025 | Fine | $20,665 |
| May 21, 2025 | Payment denial | 14 days |
| October 3, 2024 | Fine | $55,839 |
| August 9, 2024 | Fine | $79,430 |
| August 9, 2024 | Payment denial | 19 days |
| May 15, 2024 | Fine | $113,470 |
| May 15, 2024 | Payment denial | 19 days |
Ararat Nursing Facility lawsuits and criminal cases
We searched California Attorney General and Los Angeles County District Attorney announcements and news coverage for Ararat Nursing Facility and its licensee and found no public criminal case or civil lawsuit we could tie to this facility as of October 30, 2026. Many civil cases settle quietly or are not covered by the press, so this is not a complete court search.
In the news
- August 22, 2024: The Los Angeles Times reported that the California Department of Public Health issued Ararat Nursing Facility two Class AA citations, each with a $120,000 fine, after finding that violations were a substantial factor in the deaths of two residents in 2024, and that the facility said it was appealing the citations in Superior Court. Los Angeles Times (via AOL) ↗
- June 6, 2025: The Los Angeles Times reported that the California Department of Public Health moved to suspend the licenses of seven Los Angeles County nursing homes, including Ararat Nursing Facility, which had been cited in 2024 over two resident deaths, and that an attorney for the facility said it planned to appeal the suspension. Los Angeles Times (via AOL) ↗
- August 22, 2024: Becker's Hospital Review, citing the Los Angeles Times, reported that the California Department of Public Health issued AA citations totaling $240,000 to Ararat Nursing Facility in Mission Hills over the deaths of two residents in March and June 2024, and that the facility was appealing the citations. Becker's Hospital Review ↗
What this record means for your family
California uses classes for state citations. Under Health and Safety Code section 1424 ↗, a Class AA citation is a Class A violation that CDPH determined was a direct proximate cause of a resident’s death. A Class A citation means CDPH found an imminent danger, or a substantial probability, that death or serious physical harm would result. Class B covers violations with a direct or immediate relationship to residents’ health, safety or security.
Federal deficiencies carry a letter from A to L. G, H and I mean inspectors found actual harm to residents; J, K and L mean immediate jeopardy, the most serious level. F600 is the federal rule that residents be free from abuse and neglect; F609 and F610 cover reporting and investigating allegations; F689 covers accidents and supervision; F686 covers pressure injuries.
Warning signs worth asking about: unexplained bruises or fractures, new bed sores, sudden weight loss or dehydration, a resident who becomes fearful or withdrawn around certain staff, and calls that go unanswered.
What to do now
- If someone is in danger, call 911.
- File a complaint with CDPH about Ararat Nursing Facility: CDPH complaint form ↗
- Contact the long-term care ombudsman, the state-funded advocate for nursing home residents: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman ↗
- Ask the facility in writing for a copy of the resident’s chart, and write down dates, names of staff on shift, and photos of any injury.
- Talk to a Los Angeles nursing home abuse lawyer →
Free nursing home case review
We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.
Questions families ask
Has Ararat Nursing Facility been cited by the State of California?
Cal Health Find lists 19 state citations for Ararat Nursing Facility since 2023, including 2 Class AA and 9 Class A. Each one is listed in the timeline above with a link to the CDPH record.
How many complaints have been filed against Ararat Nursing Facility?
From 2023 through October 30, 2026, Cal Health Find lists 208 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes, and CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 57 of them.
Does Medicare flag Ararat Nursing Facility for abuse?
Yes. As of our data date, Medicare Care Compare shows its abuse icon for Ararat Nursing Facility. CMS uses the icon for facilities cited for abuse that harmed a resident in the past year, or cited for abuse with potential harm in each of the past two years.
Have there been sexual abuse reports at Ararat Nursing Facility?
Cal Health Find lists 2 complaint or facility-reported incident intakes at Ararat Nursing Facility since 2023 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse, and CDPH substantiated 2. The section above breaks them down by year.
Where can I read reviews and complaints about Ararat Nursing Facility?
Online reviews are opinions. The official record is the state and federal inspection file: this page summarizes it and links each citation, complaint outcome and inspection report on Cal Health Find and Medicare Care Compare, so you can read the source yourself.
How many beds does Ararat Nursing Facility have?
Ararat Nursing Facility is licensed by CDPH for 254 beds and has a CMS overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars.
Who owns or operates Ararat Nursing Facility?
CDPH lists the licensee as ARARAT HOME OF LOS ANGELES, INC.. CMS does not list a chain for this facility. According to the CMS ownership file, Ararat Home of Los Angeles Inc. holds 100% as a direct owner. The full list of owners and operators CMS reports is in the ownership section of this page.
How many nursing hours does Ararat Nursing Facility provide per resident?
Payroll data the facility filed with CMS for April through June 2026 show 5.03 total nursing hours per resident per day, including 0.51 RN hours. The California average is 4.54.
My parent was hurt at Ararat Nursing Facility. What should I do?
Get medical care first, then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman, ask for the chart in writing and keep notes and photos. For a free, confidential review of a possible case, call Beverly Law at (310) 552-6959.
Ask a question
Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.
Hurt at Ararat Nursing Facility? — Beverly Law
If your loved one was hurt at Ararat Nursing Facility, talk to a California elder abuse attorney. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.
Other nursing homes near Ararat Nursing Facility
| Facility | City | Distance | CMS stars | Class AA/A | Federal G–L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Providence Holy Cross Medical Center D/P SNF | Mission Hills | 0.2 mi | 1/5 | 1 | 4 |
| The Grove Post-Acute Care Center | Sylmar | 1.6 mi | 2/5 | 0 | 1 |
| Granada Hills Convalescent Hospital | Granada Hills | 1.8 mi | 5/5 | 1 | 1 |
| Rinaldi Convalescent Hospital | Granada Hills | 1.8 mi | 1/5 | 0 | 2 |
| Astoria Healthcare Center | Sylmar | 2.3 mi | 1/5 | 1 | 3 |
| The Rehabilitation Center of North Hills | North Hills | 2.5 mi | 1/5 | 3 | 4 |
Methodology and sources
We pulled this facility’s complaints, state enforcement actions and survey deficiencies from Cal Health Find for 2023 through October 30, 2026, downloaded the CDPH citation notices and CMS-2567 reports behind every Class AA or A citation and every federal deficiency at level G or higher, and wrote the summaries above from those documents. Facility details come from the CDPH licensing file and the CMS Provider Data Catalog. Residents are described only as the government documents describe them. See the methodology page to report an error; we review correction requests within five business days.
Sources
- Cal Health Find – Ararat Nursing Facility
- Medicare Care Compare – Ararat Nursing Facility
- CMS – Payroll-Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing (2026 Q2)
- CMS – Nursing home Provider Information (staffing, turnover)
- CMS – Nursing home Ownership
- CMS – Nursing home Penalties
- HCAI – Long-Term Care Facility Financial Data
- CDPH – State Enforcement Actions (open data)
- CMS Provider Data Catalog – Nursing homes
Important: This page reports findings from public records of the California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. A citation or deficiency is a regulatory finding by a government agency; it is not a court judgment and not proof of civil or criminal liability. Criminal defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. Lawsuit allegations are claims, not findings. This page is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with Beverly Law. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Data as of: October 30, 2026. Methodology and corrections.
☰ Contents