Beverly Law — Accident AttorneysBEVERLY LAW NURSING HOME ABUSE ATTORNEYS
NURSING HOME INSPECTION REPORT

Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital in Temple City: Inspection Record Review, Complaints and Abuse Reports (Updated October 30, 2026)

Beverly Law
Published by Beverly Law
5522 Gracewood Ave., Temple City · CDPH and CMS records · English y Español
Cal Health Find, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) database, lists 29 state citations for Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital since 2023, including 2 Class AA and 6 Class A, and 11 federal deficiencies that inspectors rated at the actual-harm level or higher (G through L). The most serious state action was a Class AA citation (Patient Care), penalty $120,000, appealed by the facility, issued May 24, 2024. The federal Medicare Care Compare site does not show its abuse icon for this facility as of our data date. Cal Health Find also lists 22 complaint or incident reports since 2023 that included a sexual abuse allegation; CDPH substantiated 3.

Is your loved one at Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital?

If they fell, developed a bed sore, lost weight, were hurt or abused at Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital, leave your name and phone. We call back today, request the chart and the full inspection file, and tell you plainly whether there is a case. Free, confidential, English or Spanish.

Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win

Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital at a glance: owner, beds and ratings

Address
5522 Gracewood Ave., Temple City, CA 91780
CDPH license / facility ID
950000093 / 950000085
Medicare CCN
055293
Licensed beds
391
Licensee (CDPH)
SANTA ANITA CONV. HOSP. & RETIREMENT CTR., INC.
Chain / affiliated entity (CMS)
None listed by CMS
Administrator of record
Eccleston, Karen E
CMS overall rating
1 of 5 stars
CMS staffing rating
3 of 5 stars
Nurse staffing (CMS)
4.43 reported nurse hours per resident per day*
CMS fines (last 3 years)
$234,187
CMS abuse icon
Not shown

* California separately requires at least 3.5 direct care service hours per patient day, counted under state rules, so the two numbers are not measured the same way.

Records: Cal Health Find ↗ · Medicare Care Compare ↗

↑ Back to contents

Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital citations and inspection findings

Newest first. State citations come from CDPH; federal deficiencies come from the CMS-2567 inspection report CDPH writes for Medicare. Every row links to the government record.

DateSourceFindingRecord
June 10, 2026Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 29, 2026Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
December 19, 2025State (CDPH)Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 17, 2025State (CDPH)Class B citation (Physical Environment), penalty $3,150Government record (CDPH) ↗
August 8, 2025State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $22,500, appealed by the facility
Sexual abuse allegation ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
June 20, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents)
F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
AbuseFalls / supervision ›Sexual abuse allegation ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
June 20, 2025State (CDPH)Class B Trebled citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $9,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 30, 2025State (CDPH)Class B Trebled citation (Patient Care), penalty $9,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 14, 2025State (CDPH)Administrative Penalty (DHPPD: 2 – 11 Days), penalty $25,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 5, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), CertificationF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 10, 2025State (CDPH)Administrative Penalty (DHPPD: 12 – 24 Days), penalty $50,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
March 26, 2025State (CDPH)Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
Show 31 older findings
DateSourceFindingRecord
January 28, 2025State (CDPH)Class B citation (Patient Rights), penalty $3,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
January 7, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Falls / supervision ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 30, 2024State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 18, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF607 – Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 23, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF602 – Free from Misappropriation/Exploitation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 17, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity E (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 3, 2024State (CDPH)Class B citation (Patient Rights), penalty $3,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 23, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF607 – Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 10, 2024State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $18,750, appealed by the facility
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 10, 2024State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $20,000, appealed by the facility
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 10, 2024State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $20,000, appealed by the facility
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 24, 2024State (CDPH)Class AA citation (Patient Care), penalty $120,000, appealed by the facility
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 21, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), CertificationF697 – Pain Management, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Falls / supervision ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 9, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF607 – Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 19, 2024State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 9, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity E (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern)
F742 – Treatment/Srvcs Mental/Psychoscial Concerns, severity K (immediate jeopardy, a pattern)
Abuse
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
March 5, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
January 3, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F607 – Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
November 14, 2023State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
November 9, 2023State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 6, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 13, 2023State (CDPH)Class AA citation (Patient Record), penalty $108,000, appealed by the facility
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 11, 2023State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
August 17, 2023State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 27, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF580 – Notify of Changes (Injury/Decline/Room, etc.), severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents)
F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F695 – Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents)
Abuse
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
June 30, 2023State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
June 6, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF686 – Treatment/Svcs to Prevent/Heal Pressure Ulcer, severity H (actual harm, a pattern)
Pressure injury ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 11, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), CertificationF698 – Dialysis, severity K (immediate jeopardy, a pattern)
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 11, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF610 – Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
February 17, 2023State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
January 12, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Falls / supervision ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗

↑ Back to contents

What inspectors found at Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital

Tap a finding to read the summary. Each one is written from the government report linked under it.

·
August 2025: Class A citation, F600 (severity J) and F689 (severity G) after a resident was sexually abused by another resident

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on June 20, 2025 to investigate a facility-reported allegation of sexual abuse. The department determined that on the night of June 19, 2025, a licensed vocational nurse (LVN 1) found Resident 2 on top of Resident 1 in her room, with her pants and diaper pulled down. Resident 1 was a 76-year-old woman with dementia and severe cognitive impairment. The citation states that Resident 2 said he was having sex with her. A hospital sexual assault nurse documented positive exam findings, and Resident 1 was started on HIV prevention medication (post-exposure prophylaxis).

CDPH found that Resident 2 had a physician's order for a one-to-one sitter (constant observation), and the facility did not provide one between 11 PM and 11:20 PM that night. Inspectors found that licensed staff did not monitor or document Resident 2's sexually inappropriate behavior seen on June 12, 2025, did not put interventions in place to protect other residents, and did not tell his physician about that behavior. According to the citation, Resident 1 later showed a dysphoric (uneasy, unhappy) mood during a psychologist visit.

CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty; CDPH records list it as appealed, with an amount due of $22,500. The 2567 report states the federal survey cited F600 (freedom from abuse and neglect) at severity J and F689 (accident hazards and supervision) at severity G, and that CDPH called an immediate jeopardy situation on June 24, 2025. According to the report, the facility's removal plan included reviewing residents with sexually inappropriate or wandering behavior, updating care plans and training staff on one-to-one supervision. The immediate jeopardy was removed on June 26, 2025.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

January 2025: F689 (severity G) after a resident left unsupervised in a wheelchair fell and broke his arm, and a knife was found in another resident's room

The 2567 report states that inspectors investigating a complaint in January 2025 found the facility did not prevent accidents for two residents. Resident 1 had dementia, a history of falls and severe cognitive impairment, and his care plan called for staff to supervise him while he sat in his wheelchair. According to the report, on January 3, 2025, CNA 1 left Resident 1 in his wheelchair without supervision. He was later found outside a building lying on the ground, holding his left arm, with a 1-centimeter cut over his left eyebrow.

Inspectors found that paramedics took Resident 1 to an acute care hospital, where he was found to have a displaced fracture (a break where the bone pieces moved out of line) at the neck of the left humerus, the upper arm bone. The 2567 report states that during the January 7, 2025 visit, inspectors also saw a pointed knife about four inches long on a shelf in Resident 3's room. The treatment nurse and the unit manager told inspectors residents are not allowed to have knives and that the facility has confused residents who wander.

According to the report, the facility's weapons policy bans blades longer than three inches. A licensed vocational nurse told inspectors that Resident 3's family had brought the knife on January 5, so it stayed in the room for about two days, and that staff should have checked the room for hazards. The federal survey cited F689 (free of accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

July 2024: Class A citation and F697 (severity G) after a resident with rib fractures went 13 hours without pain control

According to the citation, Resident 88, a 74-year-old woman on dialysis, came back from the dialysis center on May 21, 2024 with new swelling and bruising under her right arm. She said she was hurt while being moved from the dialysis chair to her wheelchair. CDPH found that her care plan addressed pain on the right side of her chest from fractures (breaks) of the ninth and tenth ribs. At 10:18 AM, inspectors saw her moaning and grimacing, and she rated her pain 9 out of 10.

The department determined that a licensed vocational nurse (LVN 15) gave her Tylenol, which is meant for mild pain, and that staff did not reassess her pain when it did not work. Inspectors found that LVN 15 and Registered Nurse 2 could not get into the automated medication dispenser to obtain Tramadol, a stronger pain medication, and did not call the physician about it. According to the citation, staff also did not tell the physician that her pain was severe and uncontrolled.

CDPH found that Resident 88 had severe pain that was not relieved for 13 hours, from 10:10 AM to 11:09 PM, and she was then transferred to an acute care hospital. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty; CDPH records list it as appealed, with an amount due of $18,750. The 2567 report states that the federal survey from the same inspection cited F697 (pain management) at severity G, describing the same failures to assess her pain, give pain medication as ordered and notify the physician.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

July 2024: Class A citation and F689 (severity G) after a resident's second fall caused a thigh bone fracture

According to the citation, CDPH investigated a facility-reported fall during the facility's annual recertification survey in May 2024. Patient 1 was a 60-year-old man with moderately impaired thinking skills who needed partial help to walk. The department determined that he had an unwitnessed fall on April 11, 2024, and a fall risk assessment that day rated him at moderate risk.

CDPH found that licensed nurses did not create a fall care plan before or after that first fall, and that no interdisciplinary falls committee met to look for the cause, as the facility's fall program required. Inspectors found that the nurses' notes for April 11 had no details about the fall or his assessment afterward. The director of nursing told inspectors that the committee meeting and the care plan should have been done after the first fall. According to the citation, staff also did not give Patient 1 the walking assistance he needed on May 1, 2024.

CDPH found that on May 1, 2024, Patient 1 was found lying on the floor during morning rounds and had broken his right femur (thigh bone). He was taken to an acute care hospital, where he had a hip hemiarthroplasty, a surgery that replaces half of the hip joint. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty; CDPH records list it as appealed, with an amount due of $20,000. The 2567 report from the federal survey of the same inspection lists F689 (free of accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

July 2024: Class A citation and F689 (severity G) after a resident who wandered fell on a patio and fractured facial bones

According to the citation, CDPH investigated a facility-reported fall during the annual recertification survey in May 2024. Patient 1 was an 87-year-old woman with dementia, severely impaired decision-making and a habit of wandering. CDPH found she was rated high risk for falls after an earlier fall on April 23, 2024. A physician's order from March 2024 told staff to monitor her whereabouts, and her care plan called for frequent visual checks.

The department determined that staff did not monitor where Patient 1 was, as the physician's order, her care plan and the facility's fall program required. Inspectors found that on May 8, 2024, she had an unwitnessed fall on a patio and was found with a cut about three centimeters long on her right upper eyelid. She was sent to an acute care hospital by 911.

According to the citation, a CT scan (a detailed X-ray image) at the hospital showed fractures of the right zygomatic arch (cheekbone), the right orbital floor (the bone under the eye) and walls of the maxillary sinus. On May 23, 2024, inspectors saw Patient 1 wandering in a hallway without staff supervision. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty; CDPH records list it as appealed, with an amount due of $20,000. The 2567 report from the federal survey of the same inspection lists F689 (free of accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

May 2024: Class AA citation and F742 (severity K) after a resident with depression went missing and whose body was later found on the premises

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on April 9, 2024 to investigate a facility report of a missing patient. Patient 1 was a 72-year-old man with depression and bipolar disorder (a condition with mood swings between lows and highs). The citation states he went missing on April 8, 2024 at 7:20 AM. Four days later, on April 12, his body was found on the facility premises, and paramedics pronounced him dead. The medical examiner's report listed the cause of death as suicide.

CDPH found that staff did not monitor or respond to Patient 1's repeated statements about feeling depressed and lonely. On March 25, 2024 he said it was "hard to live with this loneliness" and that he was "tired of living this way." The department determined that the facility did not review or update his care plan to address his history of suicidal thoughts, and did not carry out the plans a psychologist wrote in March 2024.

Inspectors found that Patient 1 arrived from a hospital in December 2023 taking Fluoxetine (an antidepressant) and Olanzapine (a bipolar medication), and these were not continued at the facility through April 8, 2024. According to the citation, his physician ordered a psychiatry consult in December 2023, and the facility could not show he was ever seen by a psychiatrist. CDPH issued a Class AA citation with a $120,000 penalty. The 2567 report states the federal survey cited F742 (treatment and services for mental and psychosocial concerns) at severity K.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

September 2023: Class AA citation, F580 (severity J) and F695 (severity J) after a resident with low oxygen levels became unresponsive and was pronounced dead

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on July 27, 2023 to investigate a facility report of a patient's death. Patient 1 was a 75-year-old woman with COPD (a lung disease that makes breathing hard), heart failure and a history of respiratory failure. Her physician ordered staff to check her oxygen level every two hours and keep it between 95% and 100%.

CDPH found that staff did not monitor her oxygen every two hours as ordered and did not start a care plan for her COPD. On July 25, 2023 at 5 PM she was short of breath, with oxygen readings of 76% and 88%. The department determined that staff did not notify her physician of this change in condition, and that licensed staff put her on a non-rebreather mask (a high-flow oxygen mask) at 8 liters per minute without a physician's order. Inspectors found the facility did not follow its own policies on change of condition, physician orders and care planning.

According to the citation, at 5:18 PM Patient 1 was found not making sense, and at 5:23 PM she became unresponsive with a fading pulse. Staff started CPR at 5:25 PM, and paramedics pronounced her dead at 6:08 PM. CDPH issued a Class AA citation with a $120,000 penalty; CDPH records list it as appealed, with a final amount due of $108,000. The 2567 report states the federal survey cited F580 (notifying the physician of changes) at severity J and also lists F695 (respiratory care) at severity J. According to the report, inspectors identified an immediate jeopardy on July 28, 2023, and it was removed on July 31 after the facility submitted an acceptable removal plan.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

August 2023: Class A citation and F686 (severity H) after a resident developed ten pressure ulcers

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit to investigate a complaint about a patient with multiple pressure ulcers (bed sores) who was later placed in hospice. Patient 1 was an 87-year-old woman with Parkinson's disease. The facility's own admission assessment in October 2022 noted she was bedridden and her skin was at high risk from moisture, friction and shear.

CDPH determined that licensed staff did not assess, monitor and document weekly wound checks for skin breakdown noted on October 25, 2022, February 5, 2023 and March 23, 2023. The department found that on ten different dates between April 1 and April 24, 2023, certified nurse assistants reported skin breakdown to licensed nurses, and the nurses did not assess it, tell the physician or provide treatment. Inspectors found that staff also did not turn her every two hours, as her care plan required, on 11 dates in April 2023.

CDPH found that Patient 1 developed ten pressure ulcers of different stages on several parts of her body, plus moisture-associated skin damage, without treatment. On April 30, 2023 she was sent to an acute care hospital with decreased consciousness, fast and labored breathing, and cold, clammy skin. According to the citation, she was diagnosed with sepsis (a serious bloodstream infection) and cellulitis (a skin infection), was later discharged with infected pressure ulcers on her buttocks, was placed in hospice, and died on May 25, 2023. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty. The 2567 report states the federal survey cited F686 (care to prevent and heal pressure ulcers) at severity H.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

June 2023: Class A citation and F698 (severity K) after a dialysis resident was found bleeding from his access site and was pronounced dead

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on May 11, 2023 to investigate a complaint about a patient found dead in his bed in a pool of blood. Patient 1 was a 64-year-old man with end stage kidney disease who received dialysis three times a week through an AV shunt, a vein in his arm surgically connected for dialysis. He had severely impaired decision-making. His care plan from January 2023 said he was at risk for shunt rupture and bleeding because he picked at the access site.

CDPH determined that for about four months, from January 13 to May 6, 2023, staff did not reevaluate, monitor or manage his behavior of picking at and touching the shunt site, and from April 13 did not revise his care plan to prevent it. The department found that licensed nurses did not assess the behavior for possible causes, did not contact his physician, and did not try non-drug approaches, as the facility's behavior policy required. Inspectors found there was no regular communication about his behavior between nursing staff, the dialysis provider and the physician.

According to the citation, on May 6, 2023 at 2:10 AM, staff found Patient 1 in bed bleeding at the shunt site. Staff called 911 and started CPR, and paramedics pronounced him dead at 2:55 AM. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty. The 2567 report states the federal survey cited F698 (dialysis) at severity K for not providing dialysis care that met professional standards, including watching for and reporting behavior that affects access sites.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

January 2023: F689 (severity G) after a resident fell from bed during one-person care and suffered facial fractures

The 2567 report states that inspectors investigating a complaint in January 2023 found the facility did not keep Resident 1 free from accidents. Resident 1 had COPD (a lung disease), heart failure and functional quadriplegia, meaning he could not move on his own because of severe frailty. His assessment showed moderate cognitive impairment, and he needed two staff members to help him move in bed. The facility rated him high risk for falls.

Inspectors found that on January 7, 2023, CNA 1 provided care and repositioned Resident 1 alone while he was in bed. According to the report, he fell out of bed and landed face down on the floor. A licensed vocational nurse wrote that CNA 1 reported the fall at 1:40 PM. Resident 1 had two cuts on the right side of his face, one about 2.5 centimeters long near his right ear.

The 2567 report states that Resident 1 was sent to an acute care hospital, where a CT scan (a detailed X-ray image) of his facial bones showed nondisplaced fractures (breaks where the bone stayed in line) of the right cheekbone, parts of the upper jaw and bones around both eye sockets. An assistant director of nursing also noted an occipital fracture, a break in the back of the skull. The federal survey cited F689 (free of accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

↑ Back to contents

Complaints against Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital

YearIntakesComplaintsFacility-reported incidentsSubstantiated (at least one allegation)
2023162659779
2024101604154
2025113833024
2026373168

Cal Health Find lists 413 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes for this facility from 2023 through October 30, 2026. CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 165 of them. 139 intakes involved an allegation in CDPH’s abuse category, and 39 of those had an abuse allegation substantiated. An intake can contain several allegations; “unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence, not that nothing happened.

↑ Back to contents

Sexual abuse reports at Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital

Cal Health Find lists 22 intakes for Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital from 2023 through October 30, 2026 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse (3 from complaints and 19 reported by the facility itself). CDPH substantiated a sexual abuse allegation in 3 of them. Federal rules require a nursing home to report an abuse allegation to the state within two hours, so a facility-reported incident means staff raised the allegation, not that it was proven. “Unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence; it does not mean nothing happened.

YearIntakes with a sexual abuse allegationSubstantiated
2023111
202452
202540
202620

Cited findings on this page whose government reports describe a sexual abuse allegation: August 2025: Class A citation, F600 (severity J) and F689 (severity G) after a resident was sexually abused by another resident

Warning signs include bruising or bleeding in the genital area or inner thighs, a new genital infection, torn or stained underclothing, and a resident who suddenly fears a particular staff member or resists being bathed or changed. If you suspect sexual abuse, call 911 or local police first, ask that the resident not be bathed before a medical exam, and then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman. Sexual abuse reports at Los Angeles County nursing homes →

↑ Back to contents

Staffing at Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital

Payroll records Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital filed with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for April through June 2026 show an average of 4.43 nursing hours per resident per day, counting registered nurses (RNs), licensed vocational nurses and nurse aides. The California average CMS published for the same period is 4.54, and the Los Angeles County median is 4.32. RN time averaged 0.34 hours per resident per day (California average 0.68). Staffing averaged 4.10 hours on weekends and 4.57 on weekdays.

CMS reports nursing staff turnover of 41.1% at this facility (California average 36.6%) and RN turnover of 51.4% (California average 37.8%).

California requires most skilled nursing facilities to provide at least 3.5 direct care hours per patient day (Health and Safety Code section 1276.65). Counting the RN, LVN and nurse aide hours in the same payroll data, Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital was below 3.5 on 0 of 91 days. This is our calculation from CMS data, not a CDPH finding: CDPH counts some staff differently (for example psychiatric technicians in special treatment programs) and can grant waivers.

Santa Anita Convalescent HospitalLA County medianCalifornia average
Total nursing hours per resident per day4.434.324.54
RN hours per resident per day0.340.460.68
Weekend nursing hours per resident per day4.103.894.10
Nursing staff turnover41.1%34.1%36.6%

Compare staffing, profits and fines across Los Angeles County nursing homes →

↑ Back to contents

Who owns Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital

The owners and operators below are listed for Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital in the federal CMS nursing home ownership file (data as of October 1, 2026). CMS requires each Medicare-certified nursing home to report anyone with a 5% or greater ownership stake and anyone with operational or managerial control.

Owner or operatorRoleShareSince
Golden State Health Centers, Inc.5% or greater direct ownership100%January 1, 1968
Martin Weiss5% or greater indirect ownership21%January 1, 2013
Helene Mayer 2007 Irrevocable Trust5% or greater indirect ownership20%April 1, 2009
Bernard FriedmanOperational or managerial control–June 1, 2011

In its annual report to the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) for the year ending December 31, 2025, the facility listed $8.5 million in payments to related companies (businesses that share owners or management with the facility): $4.4 million to 5600 Gracewood, LLC for rent; $4.2 million to Golden State Health Centers, Inc for support service fee. Payments to related companies are legal; California requires nursing homes to disclose them.

↑ Back to contents

Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital finances

Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital reported $71.2 million in health care revenue and net income of $6.9 million for the year ending December 31, 2025, a margin of 9.6%, in its annual financial report to HCAI (as submitted; HCAI has not finished reviewing it). The median operating margin that year was 5.9% for Los Angeles County nursing homes and 6.1% statewide. Medi-Cal paid for 74% of resident days. Salaries for RNs, LVNs and nurse aides came to $18.4 million.

YearRevenueNet incomeMarginOccupancyMedi-Cal days
2023$45.7 million-$2.8 million-6.1%84%–
2024$55.6 million$364,0990.7%94%78%
2025$71.2 million$6.9 million9.6%96%74%

↑ Back to contents

Federal fines and penalties: Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital

CMS lists Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital as a candidate for its Special Focus Facility program. CMS created the program for nursing homes with a history of serious quality problems; candidates are facilities whose inspection record qualifies them, and states choose which ones enter the program for closer oversight.

CMS lists 4 federal fines totaling $234,187 and 1 Medicare payment denial for Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital in the roughly three years its penalty file covers.

DatePenaltyAmount or length
June 17, 2025Fine$50,935
January 8, 2025Fine$21,548
May 25, 2024Fine$75,208
April 3, 2024Fine$86,496
April 3, 2024Payment denial4 days

↑ Back to contents

Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital lawsuits and criminal cases

We searched California Attorney General and Los Angeles County District Attorney announcements and news coverage for Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital and its licensee and found no public criminal case or civil lawsuit we could tie to this facility as of October 30, 2026. Many civil cases settle quietly or are not covered by the press, so this is not a complete court search.

↑ Back to contents

In the news

  • June 6, 2025: The Los Angeles Times reported in June 2025 that the California Department of Public Health sent letters moving to suspend the licenses of seven nursing homes that had each received at least two Class AA citations in two years, including Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital in Temple City. The article reported that the suspensions would take effect unless appealed and did not report a final outcome. Los Angeles Times (republished on AOL) ↗

↑ Back to contents

What this record means for your family

California uses classes for state citations. Under Health and Safety Code section 1424 ↗, a Class AA citation is a Class A violation that CDPH determined was a direct proximate cause of a resident’s death. A Class A citation means CDPH found an imminent danger, or a substantial probability, that death or serious physical harm would result. Class B covers violations with a direct or immediate relationship to residents’ health, safety or security.

Federal deficiencies carry a letter from A to L. G, H and I mean inspectors found actual harm to residents; J, K and L mean immediate jeopardy, the most serious level. F600 is the federal rule that residents be free from abuse and neglect; F609 and F610 cover reporting and investigating allegations; F689 covers accidents and supervision; F686 covers pressure injuries.

Warning signs worth asking about: unexplained bruises or fractures, new bed sores, sudden weight loss or dehydration, a resident who becomes fearful or withdrawn around certain staff, and calls that go unanswered.

↑ Back to contents

What to do now

Free nursing home case review

We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

No fees or costs unless we win

↑ Back to contents

Questions families ask

Has Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital been cited by the State of California?

Cal Health Find lists 29 state citations for Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital since 2023, including 2 Class AA and 6 Class A. Each one is listed in the timeline above with a link to the CDPH record.

How many complaints have been filed against Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital?

From 2023 through October 30, 2026, Cal Health Find lists 413 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes, and CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 165 of them.

Does Medicare flag Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital for abuse?

As of our data date, Medicare Care Compare does not show its abuse icon for Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital. The icon is only one signal; read the citations above.

Have there been sexual abuse reports at Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital?

Cal Health Find lists 22 complaint or facility-reported incident intakes at Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital since 2023 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse, and CDPH substantiated 3. The section above breaks them down by year.

Where can I read reviews and complaints about Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital?

Online reviews are opinions. The official record is the state and federal inspection file: this page summarizes it and links each citation, complaint outcome and inspection report on Cal Health Find and Medicare Care Compare, so you can read the source yourself.

How many beds does Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital have?

Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital is licensed by CDPH for 391 beds and has a CMS overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

Who owns or operates Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital?

CDPH lists the licensee as SANTA ANITA CONV. HOSP. & RETIREMENT CTR., INC.. CMS does not list a chain for this facility. According to the CMS ownership file, Golden State Health Centers, Inc. holds 100% as a direct owner. The full list of owners and operators CMS reports is in the ownership section of this page.

How many nursing hours does Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital provide per resident?

Payroll data the facility filed with CMS for April through June 2026 show 4.43 total nursing hours per resident per day, including 0.34 RN hours. The California average is 4.54.

My parent was hurt at Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital. What should I do?

Get medical care first, then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman, ask for the chart in writing and keep notes and photos. For a free, confidential review of a possible case, call Beverly Law at (310) 552-6959.

Ask a question

Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.

BEVERLY LAW · NURSING HOME ABUSE ATTORNEYS

Hurt at Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital? — Beverly Law

If your loved one was hurt at Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital, talk to a California elder abuse attorney. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

✓Free consultation✓No fees or costs unless we win✓English y Español✓Available 24/7

↑ Back to contents

Other nursing homes near Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital

FacilityCityDistanceCMS starsClass AA/AFederal G–L
Baldwin Gardens Nursing CenterTemple City0.6 mi4/500
Temple City HealthcareTemple City1.1 mi2/510
Arcadia Care CenterArcadia1.4 mi2/501
Fidelity Health CareEl Monte1.5 mi5/500
Rosemead Healthcare CenterEl Monte1.6 mi2/502
Mayflower Care CenterEl Monte1.9 mi4/511

↑ Back to contents

Methodology and sources

We pulled this facility’s complaints, state enforcement actions and survey deficiencies from Cal Health Find for 2023 through October 30, 2026, downloaded the CDPH citation notices and CMS-2567 reports behind every Class AA or A citation and every federal deficiency at level G or higher, and wrote the summaries above from those documents. Facility details come from the CDPH licensing file and the CMS Provider Data Catalog. Residents are described only as the government documents describe them. See the methodology page to report an error; we review correction requests within five business days.

Sources

  1. Cal Health Find – Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital
  2. Medicare Care Compare – Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital
  3. CMS – Payroll-Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing (2026 Q2)
  4. CMS – Nursing home Provider Information (staffing, turnover)
  5. CMS – Nursing home Ownership
  6. CMS – Nursing home Penalties
  7. HCAI – Long-Term Care Facility Financial Data
  8. CDPH – State Enforcement Actions (open data)
  9. CMS Provider Data Catalog – Nursing homes

Important: This page reports findings from public records of the California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. A citation or deficiency is a regulatory finding by a government agency; it is not a court judgment and not proof of civil or criminal liability. Criminal defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. Lawsuit allegations are claims, not findings. This page is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with Beverly Law. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Data as of: October 30, 2026. Methodology and corrections.

↑ Back to contents

☰ Contents
×

Free nursing home case review

We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

No fees or costs unless we win
© 2026 Beverly Law. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Free consultation
No fees or costs unless we win
Call Now · 24/7
4.8 out of 5 · 604 Google reviews
Skip to content