Beverly Law — Accident AttorneysBEVERLY LAW NURSING HOME ABUSE ATTORNEYS
NURSING HOME INSPECTION REPORT

Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center in Santa Monica: Inspection Record Review, Complaints and Abuse Reports (Updated October 30, 2026)

Beverly Law
Published by Beverly Law
1338 20th St, Santa Monica · CDPH and CMS records · English y Español
Cal Health Find, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) database, lists 20 state citations for Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center since 2023, including 0 Class AA and 6 Class A, and 7 federal deficiencies that inspectors rated at the actual-harm level or higher (G through L). The most serious state action was a Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000, appealed by the facility, issued July 16, 2026. The federal Medicare Care Compare site does not show its abuse icon for this facility as of our data date. Cal Health Find also lists 14 complaint or incident reports since 2023 that included a sexual abuse allegation; CDPH substantiated 1.

Is your loved one at Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center?

If they fell, developed a bed sore, lost weight, were hurt or abused at Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center, leave your name and phone. We call back today, request the chart and the full inspection file, and tell you plainly whether there is a case. Free, confidential, English or Spanish.

Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win

Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center at a glance: owner, beds and ratings

Address
1338 20th St, Santa Monica, CA 90404
CDPH license / facility ID
910000154 / 910000336
Medicare CCN
555808
Licensed beds
144
Licensee (CDPH)
1338 20TH STREET LLC
Chain / affiliated entity (CMS)
None listed by CMS
Administrator of record
Montag, Memphis L
CMS overall rating
1 of 5 stars
CMS staffing rating
2 of 5 stars
Nurse staffing (CMS)
4.04 reported nurse hours per resident per day*
CMS fines (last 3 years)
$143,164
CMS abuse icon
Not shown

* California separately requires at least 3.5 direct care service hours per patient day, counted under state rules, so the two numbers are not measured the same way.

Records: Cal Health Find ↗ · Medicare Care Compare ↗

↑ Back to contents

Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center citations and inspection findings

Newest first. State citations come from CDPH; federal deficiencies come from the CMS-2567 inspection report CDPH writes for Medicare. Every row links to the government record.

DateSourceFindingRecord
September 10, 2026Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF602 – Free from Misappropriation/Exploitation, severity E (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 17, 2026State (CDPH)Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 16, 2026State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000, appealed by the facility
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
December 10, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 17, 2025State (CDPH)Class B Trebled citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $9,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 17, 2025State (CDPH)Class B Trebled citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $9,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 9, 2025State (CDPH)Administrative Penalty (DHPPD: 2 – 11 Days), penalty $25,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 11, 2025State (CDPH)Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,050Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 4, 2025State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 3, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Abuse
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
August 27, 2025State (CDPH)Administrative Penalty (DHPPD: 12 – 24 Days), penalty $50,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 30, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
Show 24 older findings
DateSourceFindingRecord
July 22, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 28, 2025State (CDPH)Class B Trebled citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $9,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 16, 2025State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 8, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 14, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 14, 2025State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 8, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 1, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Falls / supervision ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
March 28, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF602 – Free from Misappropriation/Exploitation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
February 24, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Falls / supervision ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
December 12, 2024State (CDPH)Class B Trebled citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $9,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
November 26, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 24, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 12, 2024State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $20,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
February 16, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF686 – Treatment/Svcs to Prevent/Heal Pressure Ulcer, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Pressure injury ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
February 2, 2024State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
January 29, 2024State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
January 26, 2024State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
January 26, 2024State (CDPH)Class B Trebled citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $9,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
December 30, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F678 – Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents)
F610 – Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F755 – Pharmacy Srvcs/Procedures/Pharmacist/Records, severity K (immediate jeopardy, a pattern)
F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents)
Abuse
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 10, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF607 – Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 18, 2023State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 10, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF602 – Free from Misappropriation/Exploitation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
March 6, 2023Federal (CMS-2567), CertificationF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗

↑ Back to contents

What inspectors found at Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center

Tap a finding to read the summary. Each one is written from the government report linked under it.

·
July 2026: Class A citation after a resident left the facility twice at night

According to the citation, CDPH investigated a complaint involving Resident 1, a woman with heart failure, atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), diabetes and cognitive impairment who needed staff supervision when walking. CDPH found that on 3/30/2026 she showed wandering behavior and tried to leave the facility. Staff placed a wander guard (a wrist alarm device) on her, and a physician ordered staff to check its placement every shift, but an elopement risk assessment that same day recorded her as not at risk.

The department determined the facility did not accurately assess her elopement risk, did not develop and carry out an elopement care plan after the March attempt, and did not make sure staff checked the wander guard as ordered. According to the citation, Resident 1 eloped (left without staff knowing) on the night of 5/27/2026 and again on 6/2/2026, and both times walked to an acute care hospital to seek medical care. On 5/27/2026 a licensed vocational nurse found her missing at the 11 p.m. shift change, searched the building, and police were called. She was returned by ambulance early the next morning.

CDPH also found that on 5/30/2026 paper or other items had been placed around the locking mechanism of a patio gate, and on 6/3/2026 a gate to the rear alley was propped open with a black plastic bag, which would keep the alarm from activating. The department said these failures left Resident 1 at ongoing risk of leaving again. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

September 2025: Class A citation after a resident who did not return from an appointment was not searched for or reported missing

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on 8/1/2025 to investigate a complaint about resident abuse and misappropriation of property. CDPH found that Resident 3, who was blind, used a wheelchair and needed help with personal hygiene, had been admitted on 7/8/2025. On 7/16/2025 she left the facility without telling staff, and staff searched and called police that evening.

The department determined that on 7/24/2025 a physician's order allowed Resident 3 to go out on a pass with a family member at 7:30 a.m., using a transportation service, for an outside medical appointment. According to the citation, she did not return, and the facility did not help arrange her return transportation, did not report her missing, and did not conduct a meaningful search. CDPH found the facility did not follow its own elopement policy, which called for a search, notifying law enforcement and calling 911.

Inspectors also found the facility did not provide continuing physician supervision while Resident 3 was talking by phone with the facility's physician during her absence, and had no records showing she was discharged by physician's order or against medical advice. According to the citation, her whereabouts and well-being stayed unknown for nine days, from 7/24/2025 to 8/1/2025, while she was still admitted under the facility's care. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

September 2025: F600 (severity G) after corporate staff removed two residents from their power wheelchairs

The federal 2567 report states that inspectors found the facility did not protect Residents 2 and 3 from mental and physical abuse. According to the report, unidentified corporate staff (people from the parent company, not regular facility employees) forcefully pulled the two residents out of their motorized power wheelchairs and put them in manual wheelchairs against their wishes. Inspectors found the residents were confined to bed and denied mobility from 8/29/2025 to 8/30/2025 after being deprived of their preferred device without clinical justification or consent.

Resident 2 had intact cognition and used her power wheelchair independently. According to the report, the assistant director of nursing, who appeared hesitant and worried about retaliation, said Resident 2 first agreed to try the switch but later changed her mind, and that corporate staff allegedly went ahead anyway. A licensed vocational nurse told inspectors she heard Resident 2 yelling "Back up, don't touch me" and saw a corporate vice president and several unfamiliar people around her. The report states police came but spoke only with corporate representatives, and a staff note said corporate had portrayed the resident to police as lacking capacity.

Inspectors determined both residents lost autonomy, dignity and independence and suffered psychosocial harm, including anxiety, helplessness and emotional distress. On 9/3/2025 Resident 2 was sent to an acute care hospital for left shoulder and arm pain; an X-ray showed no fracture or dislocation. The 2567 report cites F600 (freedom from abuse and neglect) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

May 2025: Class A citation and F689 (severity G) after repeated falls and a hip fracture

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on 4/1/2025 to investigate a quality-of-care complaint about Resident 1, a woman with dementia, epilepsy, osteoarthritis and a history of repeated falls who was assessed as a fall risk. CDPH found she fell three times between September 2024 and March 2025. On 9/13/2024 a CNA found her sitting on the floor with cuts to her head and under her left eye, not responding to voice, and she was sent by 911 to an acute care hospital, where imaging showed a 1 mm partial displacement between two neck vertebrae. She fell again on 11/14/2024 without injury.

The department determined staff did not supervise and monitor her as her "Falling Star Program" fall care plan required, and did not revise or check that plan after the November fall. The federal 2567 report adds that she was not placed on one-to-one care with a sitter as the program called for. According to the citation, the facility did not keep her call light within reach and did not remove a puddle of urine by her bed that, according to the director of nursing, caused her to slip and fall on 3/15/2025. In that fall she had severe pain and a fracture of the neck of the left femur (thigh bone near the hip) and was hospitalized for a hemiarthroplasty, a surgery that replaces half of the hip joint with an implant.

CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty. The 2567 report cites F689 (accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

April 2025: Class A citation and F689 (severity G) after a fall without a working bed alarm

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on 2/24/2025 to investigate a complaint about the care of Resident 1, who had dementia, blindness in both eyes, hearing loss, unsteady walking, a history of falls and an artificial right hip. CDPH found a physician had ordered a bed alarm (a sensor that alerts staff when a resident gets out of bed) and floor mats on both sides of the bed as fall precautions when Resident 1 was admitted in November 2024.

The department determined that on 2/7/2025, after Resident 1 became agitated, staff moved the resident to another room in a wheelchair, but the bed alarm was not moved along. According to the citation, a registered nurse supervisor said the alarm stayed behind because there was already a bed in the new room. CNA 1 told inspectors that around 6 p.m. he heard someone screaming for help, found Resident 1 on the floor, and had not heard any bed alarm. CDPH also found the facility had not created a care plan to reduce Resident 1's fall risk. A roommate told inspectors Resident 1 got out of bed frequently.

CDPH found Resident 1 had a small cut on the forehead and a fracture of the right hip bone near the hip prosthesis, and was sent to an acute care hospital. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty. The federal 2567 report cites F689 (accident hazards, supervision and devices) at severity G, finding the facility did not supervise Resident 1 to prevent falls or make sure the bed alarm was moved with the resident and working.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

April 2024: Class A citation and F686 (severity G) after a pressure injury developed under a leg splint

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on 2/16/2024 to investigate a complaint about neglect and quality of care. CDPH found Resident 1 was admitted on 12/15/2023 with a dislocated right ankle held in a short leg splint, a device that keeps a broken bone or dislocated joint in place. Resident 1 was assessed as at risk for a pressure injury (bed sore), which can also be caused by medical devices pressing on the skin.

The department determined that from 12/15/2023 to 12/20/2023 the resident's chart had no record of staff assessing or monitoring the skin of the right lower leg under the splint, and there was no physician order for preventive care or monitoring of the splint area. According to the citation, the facility did not carry out the resident's care plan to protect the skin, did not write an individual plan with steps to prevent skin breakdown where the splint was applied, and did not follow its own policies on splints, pressure injury prevention and wound care. On 12/21/2023 staff documented a new wound with possible infection on the right lower leg, and a physician ordered a wound consult for friction from the splint.

CDPH found Resident 1 developed an unstageable pressure injury on the right lower leg from the splint. The federal 2567 report describes this as full-thickness damage with a base covered by dead tissue. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $20,000 penalty. The 2567 report cites F686 (treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers) at severity G.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

February 2024: Class A citation, F678 and F600 (severity J), F755 (severity K), F609 and F610 (severity D) after staff did not perform CPR

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on 12/29/2023 to investigate a complaint about the death of a resident on 11/25/2023. Resident 4 was a 40-year-old man with cancer in the pelvis, tubes draining both kidneys and a history of acute respiratory failure. CDPH found his physician's orders called for vital signs every shift and for CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) if he was found unresponsive, and his POLST form (a medical order on life-sustaining treatment) had full treatment checked.

The department determined that staff did not take his vital signs as ordered. A licensed vocational nurse recorded only an oxygen reading at 2:59 a.m. and marked the vital signs "not administered" with the note "sleeping soundly." According to the citation, at 5:30 a.m. CNA 5 found Resident 4 not breathing, motionless and without vital signs and called the licensed vocational nurse and a registered nurse. CDPH found none of the three staff members performed CPR or called 911, and the registered nurse pronounced him dead at 5:35 a.m.

CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty. The federal 2567 report cites F678 (CPR) at severity J and states an immediate jeopardy was called on 12/30/2023 and removed on 1/3/2024 after the facility's removal plan, which included in-service training on CPR for full-code residents, change of condition and nurses' scope of practice, plus quality committee audits. The same report lists F600 (freedom from abuse and neglect) at severity J, F755 (pharmacy services) at severity K, and F609 and F610 (reporting and investigating alleged violations) at severity D. The full narrative for those tags is in the linked report.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

↑ Back to contents

Complaints against Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center

YearIntakesComplaintsFacility-reported incidentsSubstantiated (at least one allegation)
202334211321
202434221214
2025122903228
202612689376

Cal Health Find lists 316 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes for this facility from 2023 through October 30, 2026. CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 69 of them. 108 intakes involved an allegation in CDPH’s abuse category, and 11 of those had an abuse allegation substantiated. An intake can contain several allegations; “unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence, not that nothing happened.

↑ Back to contents

Sexual abuse reports at Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center

Cal Health Find lists 14 intakes for Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center from 2023 through October 30, 2026 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse (7 from complaints and 7 reported by the facility itself). CDPH substantiated a sexual abuse allegation in 1 of them. Federal rules require a nursing home to report an abuse allegation to the state within two hours, so a facility-reported incident means staff raised the allegation, not that it was proven. “Unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence; it does not mean nothing happened.

YearIntakes with a sexual abuse allegationSubstantiated
202321
202440
202540
202640

Warning signs include bruising or bleeding in the genital area or inner thighs, a new genital infection, torn or stained underclothing, and a resident who suddenly fears a particular staff member or resists being bathed or changed. If you suspect sexual abuse, call 911 or local police first, ask that the resident not be bathed before a medical exam, and then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman. Sexual abuse reports at Los Angeles County nursing homes →

↑ Back to contents

Staffing at Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center

Payroll records Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center filed with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for April through June 2026 show an average of 4.04 nursing hours per resident per day, counting registered nurses (RNs), licensed vocational nurses and nurse aides. The California average CMS published for the same period is 4.54, and the Los Angeles County median is 4.32. RN time averaged 0.35 hours per resident per day (California average 0.68). Staffing averaged 3.54 hours on weekends and 4.25 on weekdays.

CMS reports nursing staff turnover of 59.8% at this facility (California average 36.6%) and RN turnover of 64.3% (California average 37.8%).

California requires most skilled nursing facilities to provide at least 3.5 direct care hours per patient day (Health and Safety Code section 1276.65). Counting the RN, LVN and nurse aide hours in the same payroll data, Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center was below 3.5 on 21 of 91 days. This is our calculation from CMS data, not a CDPH finding: CDPH counts some staff differently (for example psychiatric technicians in special treatment programs) and can grant waivers.

Santa Monica Rehabilitation CenterLA County medianCalifornia average
Total nursing hours per resident per day4.044.324.54
RN hours per resident per day0.350.460.68
Weekend nursing hours per resident per day3.543.894.10
Nursing staff turnover59.8%34.1%36.6%

Compare staffing, profits and fines across Los Angeles County nursing homes →

↑ Back to contents

Who owns Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center

The owners and operators below are listed for Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center in the federal CMS nursing home ownership file (data as of October 1, 2026). CMS requires each Medicare-certified nursing home to report anyone with a 5% or greater ownership stake and anyone with operational or managerial control.

Owner or operatorRoleShareSince
1338 Santa Monica Partners LLC5% or greater direct ownership50%August 1, 2024
Ezequiel Bercovich5% or greater direct ownership20%August 1, 2024
Santa Monica Rehab Holldings LLC5% or greater direct ownership15%August 1, 2024
Adam Zenou5% or greater direct ownership15%August 1, 2024
Avi Horowicz5% or greater indirect ownership15%August 1, 2024
Sara Chueke-Bercovich5% or greater indirect ownershipNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDAugust 1, 2024
Ezequiel BercovichOperational or managerial control–August 1, 2024
Nurit RuberOperational or managerial control–August 1, 2024
Shuo WangOperational or managerial control–December 5, 2024

In its annual report to the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) for the year ending December 31, 2025, the facility listed $562,591 in payments to related companies (businesses that share owners or management with the facility): $562,591 to SNF Management, Inc for admin expense>management fee. Payments to related companies are legal; California requires nursing homes to disclose them.

↑ Back to contents

Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center finances

Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center reported $18.8 million in health care revenue and net income of $565,709 for the year ending December 31, 2025, a margin of 3.0%, in its annual financial report to HCAI (as submitted; HCAI has not finished reviewing it). The median operating margin that year was 5.9% for Los Angeles County nursing homes and 6.1% statewide. Medi-Cal paid for 80% of resident days. Salaries for RNs, LVNs and nurse aides came to $5.4 million.

YearRevenueNet incomeMarginOccupancyMedi-Cal days
2023$12.8 million-$1.6 million-12.9%64%–
2024*$7.5 million-$1.3 million-17.7%68%78%
2025$18.8 million$565,7093.0%89%80%

* More than one report was filed that year, usually after a change of ownership; the table shows the longest reporting period.

↑ Back to contents

Federal fines and penalties: Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center

CMS lists Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center as a candidate for its Special Focus Facility program. CMS created the program for nursing homes with a history of serious quality problems; candidates are facilities whose inspection record qualifies them, and states choose which ones enter the program for closer oversight.

CMS lists 3 federal fines totaling $143,164 and 2 Medicare payment denials for Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center in the roughly three years its penalty file covers.

DatePenaltyAmount or length
August 21, 2025Fine$37,310
February 6, 2025Fine$78,787
February 6, 2025Payment denial33 days
January 8, 2024Fine$27,067
January 8, 2024Payment denial60 days

↑ Back to contents

Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center lawsuits and criminal cases

We searched California Attorney General and Los Angeles County District Attorney announcements and news coverage for Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center and its licensee and found no public criminal case or civil lawsuit we could tie to this facility as of October 30, 2026. Many civil cases settle quietly or are not covered by the press, so this is not a complete court search.

↑ Back to contents

What this record means for your family

California uses classes for state citations. Under Health and Safety Code section 1424 ↗, a Class AA citation is a Class A violation that CDPH determined was a direct proximate cause of a resident’s death. A Class A citation means CDPH found an imminent danger, or a substantial probability, that death or serious physical harm would result. Class B covers violations with a direct or immediate relationship to residents’ health, safety or security.

Federal deficiencies carry a letter from A to L. G, H and I mean inspectors found actual harm to residents; J, K and L mean immediate jeopardy, the most serious level. F600 is the federal rule that residents be free from abuse and neglect; F609 and F610 cover reporting and investigating allegations; F689 covers accidents and supervision; F686 covers pressure injuries.

Warning signs worth asking about: unexplained bruises or fractures, new bed sores, sudden weight loss or dehydration, a resident who becomes fearful or withdrawn around certain staff, and calls that go unanswered.

↑ Back to contents

What to do now

Free nursing home case review

We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

No fees or costs unless we win

↑ Back to contents

Questions families ask

Has Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center been cited by the State of California?

Cal Health Find lists 20 state citations for Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center since 2023, including 0 Class AA and 6 Class A. Each one is listed in the timeline above with a link to the CDPH record.

How many complaints have been filed against Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center?

From 2023 through October 30, 2026, Cal Health Find lists 316 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes, and CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 69 of them.

Does Medicare flag Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center for abuse?

As of our data date, Medicare Care Compare does not show its abuse icon for Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center. The icon is only one signal; read the citations above.

Have there been sexual abuse reports at Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center?

Cal Health Find lists 14 complaint or facility-reported incident intakes at Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center since 2023 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse, and CDPH substantiated 1. The section above breaks them down by year.

Where can I read reviews and complaints about Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center?

Online reviews are opinions. The official record is the state and federal inspection file: this page summarizes it and links each citation, complaint outcome and inspection report on Cal Health Find and Medicare Care Compare, so you can read the source yourself.

How many beds does Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center have?

Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center is licensed by CDPH for 144 beds and has a CMS overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

Who owns or operates Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center?

CDPH lists the licensee as 1338 20TH STREET LLC. CMS does not list a chain for this facility. According to the CMS ownership file, 1338 Santa Monica Partners LLC holds 50% as a direct owner. The full list of owners and operators CMS reports is in the ownership section of this page.

How many nursing hours does Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center provide per resident?

Payroll data the facility filed with CMS for April through June 2026 show 4.04 total nursing hours per resident per day, including 0.35 RN hours. The California average is 4.54.

My parent was hurt at Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center. What should I do?

Get medical care first, then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman, ask for the chart in writing and keep notes and photos. For a free, confidential review of a possible case, call Beverly Law at (310) 552-6959.

Ask a question

Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.

BEVERLY LAW · NURSING HOME ABUSE ATTORNEYS

Hurt at Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center? — Beverly Law

If your loved one was hurt at Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center, talk to a California elder abuse attorney. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

✓Free consultation✓No fees or costs unless we win✓English y Español✓Available 24/7

↑ Back to contents

Other nursing homes near Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center

FacilityCityDistanceCMS starsClass AA/AFederal G–L
Santa Monica Health Care CenterSanta Monica0.0 mi4/513
Berkley East Healthcare CenterSanta Monica0.1 mi2/537
Pacific Post – AcuteSanta Monica0.2 mi5/500
Ocean Pointe Healthcare CenterSanta Monica0.2 mi3/512
Berkley West Healthcare CenterSanta Monica0.2 mi3/512
Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica0.4 mi1/535

↑ Back to contents

Methodology and sources

We pulled this facility’s complaints, state enforcement actions and survey deficiencies from Cal Health Find for 2023 through October 30, 2026, downloaded the CDPH citation notices and CMS-2567 reports behind every Class AA or A citation and every federal deficiency at level G or higher, and wrote the summaries above from those documents. Facility details come from the CDPH licensing file and the CMS Provider Data Catalog. Residents are described only as the government documents describe them. See the methodology page to report an error; we review correction requests within five business days.

Sources

  1. Cal Health Find – Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center
  2. Medicare Care Compare – Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center
  3. CMS – Payroll-Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing (2026 Q2)
  4. CMS – Nursing home Provider Information (staffing, turnover)
  5. CMS – Nursing home Ownership
  6. CMS – Nursing home Penalties
  7. HCAI – Long-Term Care Facility Financial Data
  8. CDPH – State Enforcement Actions (open data)
  9. CMS Provider Data Catalog – Nursing homes

Important: This page reports findings from public records of the California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. A citation or deficiency is a regulatory finding by a government agency; it is not a court judgment and not proof of civil or criminal liability. Criminal defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. Lawsuit allegations are claims, not findings. This page is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with Beverly Law. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Data as of: October 30, 2026. Methodology and corrections.

↑ Back to contents

☰ Contents
×

Free nursing home case review

We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

No fees or costs unless we win
© 2026 Beverly Law. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Free consultation
No fees or costs unless we win
Call Now · 24/7
4.8 out of 5 · 604 Google reviews
Skip to content