Beverly Law — Accident AttorneysBEVERLY LAW NURSING HOME ABUSE ATTORNEYS
NURSING HOME INSPECTION REPORT

Intercommunity Care Center in Long Beach: Inspection Record Review, Complaints and Abuse Reports (Updated October 30, 2026)

Beverly Law
Published by Beverly Law
2626 Grand Ave, Long Beach · CDPH and CMS records · English y Español
Cal Health Find, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) database, lists 13 state citations for Intercommunity Care Center since 2023, including 0 Class AA and 5 Class A, and 7 federal deficiencies that inspectors rated at the actual-harm level or higher (G through L). The most serious state action was a Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $60,000, issued September 25, 2026. The federal Medicare Care Compare site shows its abuse icon for this facility as of our data date. Cal Health Find also lists 1 complaint or incident report since 2023 that included a sexual abuse allegation; CDPH substantiated 0.

Is your loved one at Intercommunity Care Center?

If they fell, developed a bed sore, lost weight, were hurt or abused at Intercommunity Care Center, leave your name and phone. We call back today, request the chart and the full inspection file, and tell you plainly whether there is a case. Free, confidential, English or Spanish.

Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win

Intercommunity Care Center at a glance: owner, beds and ratings

Address
2626 Grand Ave, Long Beach, CA 90815
CDPH license / facility ID
940000098 / 940000065
Medicare CCN
555823
Licensed beds
147
Licensee (CDPH)
INTERCOMMUNITY CARE CENTERS, INC.
Chain / affiliated entity (CMS)
None listed by CMS
Administrator of record
Tiples, Reylon
CMS overall rating
1 of 5 stars
CMS staffing rating
3 of 5 stars
Nurse staffing (CMS)
3.97 reported nurse hours per resident per day*
CMS fines (last 3 years)
$256,751
CMS abuse icon
Shown

* California separately requires at least 3.5 direct care service hours per patient day, counted under state rules, so the two numbers are not measured the same way.

Records: Cal Health Find ↗ · Medicare Care Compare ↗

↑ Back to contents

Intercommunity Care Center citations and inspection findings

Newest first. State citations come from CDPH; federal deficiencies come from the CMS-2567 inspection report CDPH writes for Medicare. Every row links to the government record.

DateSourceFindingRecord
September 25, 2026State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $60,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 24, 2026State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
August 4, 2026Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents)
F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 29, 2026State (CDPH)Class WMF=<$1000 citation (Willful Material Falsification), penalty $6,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
March 6, 2026State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
March 4, 2026State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
January 23, 2026Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
January 21, 2026Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF656 – Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 18, 2025State (CDPH)Administrative Penalty (DHPPD: 12 – 24 Days), penalty $50,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 9, 2025State (CDPH)Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
April 9, 2025State (CDPH)Class A Trebled citation (Patient Care), penalty $75,000
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
February 14, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents)
F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
AbuseFalls / supervision ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
Show 15 older findings
DateSourceFindingRecord
January 29, 2025Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
December 20, 2024State (CDPH)Class B Trebled citation (Patient Rights), penalty $9,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
November 27, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Falls / supervision ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 10, 2024State (CDPH)Administrative Penalty (DHPPD: 12 – 24 Days), penalty $50,000Government record (CDPH) ↗
October 8, 2024State (CDPH)Class B Trebled citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $9,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
September 26, 2024State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $19,125, appealed by the facility
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
August 29, 2024State (CDPH)Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $52,000, appealed by the facility
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
August 22, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
August 14, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents)
Falls / supervision ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
August 7, 2024State (CDPH)Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,150Government record (CDPH) ↗
July 9, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF678 – Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents)
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
June 18, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents)
Falls / supervision ›
Read what inspectors found ↓
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 28, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF610 – Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
May 2, 2024State (CDPH)Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗
March 27, 2024Federal (CMS-2567), ComplaintF600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
F607 – Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated)
Abuse
Government record (CDPH) ↗

↑ Back to contents

What inspectors found at Intercommunity Care Center

Tap a finding to read the summary. Each one is written from the government report linked under it.

·
September 2026: Class A citation, F600 (severity J) and F609 (severity D) after a resident was strangled by her roommate

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on August 4, 2026, to investigate a complaint and a facility-reported incident about an altercation between two residents. CDPH determined that Resident 1, a 67-year-old woman, physically attacked and strangled Resident 2, a 78-year-old woman who shared her room, and that Resident 2 died. The citation states that on August 1, 2026, at about 7:15 p.m., CNA 1 entered the room and found Resident 1 pulling a shoelace tight around Resident 2's mouth and neck. Staff separated the residents, started CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and called paramedics.

Inspectors found the facility failed to protect Resident 2 from abuse by Resident 1 and did not follow its own policies on abuse prevention and on residents whose behavior puts others at risk. According to the 2567 report, after the attack Resident 1 was allowed to move about the building without supervision for 21 minutes. She sat with six other residents in the activity and dining room until her arrest. Inspectors identified an immediate jeopardy (a situation likely to cause serious harm or death) on August 6, 2026.

CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $60,000 penalty. The federal report cites F600 (severity J), on freedom from abuse and neglect, and F609 (severity D), on reporting of alleged violations. According to the 2567 report, the facility's plan to remove the immediate jeopardy included retraining the nurses and CNAs involved, a new rule that a resident who assaults another must stay under direct supervision until police or emergency responders take over, and hourly safety rounds. Inspectors removed the immediate jeopardy on August 12, 2026.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

March 2026: Class A citation and F656 (severity G) after a fall in which a resident broke her thigh bone

According to the citation, CDPH made an unannounced visit on January 21, 2026, to investigate a facility-reported incident about resident safety. Resident 1 was a 68-year-old woman with dementia and an abnormal gait. Her assessments showed severely impaired decision-making, that she needed supervision for walking, and that she used a front-wheeled walker.

CDPH found the facility failed to develop and carry out an individualized fall prevention care plan for her, including reminders to use her walker and to call for help before walking. Inspectors also found the facility did not follow its own policy that makes the interdisciplinary care team responsible for each resident's individualized care plan. According to the citation, on January 6, 2026, at 9:40 p.m., staff saw Resident 1 walking in a hallway without her walker. She suddenly started running and fell on her left side. The next morning she rated her hip pain 10 out of 10. An X-ray showed an acute fracture of the left thigh bone (femur), and she was sent to a general acute care hospital. Hospital records reviewed by inspectors show she had a hemiarthroplasty (surgery to replace the ball of the hip joint) on January 8, 2026.

CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty. The federal 2567 report cites F656 (severity G), on developing and implementing a comprehensive care plan, and states the failures led to the fall and the fracture.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

April 2025: Class A citation (penalty trebled), F689 (severity J) and F609 (severity D) after an unsupervised fall on an outdoor patio

According to the citation, CDPH received a facility-reported incident on January 31, 2025, about a resident found on the ground on the facility's outdoor patio, and investigated on February 14, 2025. Resident 1 was an 84-year-old man with dementia and severe cognitive impairment who was assessed as high risk for falls. He had broken his left hip in a fall at the facility in March 2024.

CDPH determined that on January 23, 2025, Resident 1 opened a patio exit door that had a sensor alarm and went outside alone, and staff did not respond to the alarm. Video reviewed by inspectors showed him walking on the patio without his walker. At 2:39 p.m. he tried to sit in a chair, missed it and fell. A nursing note written at 3:30 p.m. states he was found on the patio and could not move. A hospital diagnosed a right hip fracture. Inspectors found the facility failed to supervise him, did not keep continuous supervision on the patio, and did not update his care plan after the earlier fall.

CDPH issued a Class A citation and trebled the $25,000 penalty to $75,000. The federal 2567 report cites F689 (severity J), on accident hazards and supervision, and F609 (severity D), on reporting of alleged violations. According to the 2567 report, inspectors called an immediate jeopardy on February 21, 2025. The facility's removal plan included a fall risk audit of all residents, zone monitoring with 15-minute safety rounds, updated care plans and staff training. The immediate jeopardy was removed on February 25, 2025.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

November 2024: F689 (severity G) after a resident fell from a wheelchair with a worn self-release belt

According to the 2567 report, Resident 1 was a woman with dementia, kyphosis (an abnormally curved spine) and a history of falls, assessed as high risk for falls. A physician's order called for a wheelchair with a self-release belt, a device meant to remind a resident to call for help before getting up. Inspectors found she had already fallen in April 2024 and again in June 2024, when she leaned forward with the belt on and fell face down, getting a large bump on her forehead. The incident reviews recommended frequent checks, but inspectors found no record that the belt was examined for wear.

Inspectors found that on November 15, 2024, while Nursing Assistant 1 was wheeling her to the dining room, Resident 1 fell face forward out of the wheelchair. She sustained a broken nose and a head contusion (a bruise to the brain) and was hospitalized from November 15 to 16, 2024. CNA 1 told inspectors the Velcro on the belt was worn out and no longer held the straps together, and that the facility ordered new belts after the fall.

The 2567 report cites F689 (severity G), on accident hazards, supervision and assistive devices. Inspectors found the facility failed to keep the belt in working condition, did not develop a care plan for its use, and did not follow its own fall policy, which calls for new or different interventions when falls keep happening.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

September 2024: Class A citation and F689 (severity G) after a one-person transfer in which a resident broke her thigh bone

According to the citation, CDPH investigated a complaint and a facility-reported incident in August 2024 about a resident whose right hip was swollen, red and bruised. Resident 1 was a woman with dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Her assessment and care plan said she was fully dependent on staff and needed two people to help with transfers between a chair and the bed.

CDPH determined that on August 13, 2024, at about 10 a.m., CNA 1 moved Resident 1 by himself from her geri-chair (a large padded chair) to her bed to change her brief. He told inspectors he heard a popping sound and she became more agitated, but he did not report it to a nurse. He said he knew she needed two-person help but thought that applied more to female CNAs, and that he wanted her ready before her family arrived. Later that morning her family found her in pain with a very swollen thigh. At a general acute care hospital she was found to have a displaced fracture of the lower right femur (thigh bone) broken into several pieces. She had surgery on August 17, 2024, to place a metal rod inside the bone.

Inspectors found the facility failed to make sure staff followed her care plan and its own policies on reporting changes in condition, resident safety and asking for help when lifting. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $22,500 penalty. The federal 2567 report cites F689 (severity G), on accident hazards, supervision and assistive devices.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

August 2024: Class A citation and F678 (severity J) after an eight-minute delay in starting CPR

According to the citation, CDPH received a complaint on July 8, 2024, that a resident choked on a meal, and visited the facility on July 10, 2024. Resident 1 was a 72-year-old man with blindness, a seizure disorder and dementia. His code status was Full Code, meaning staff were to attempt all life-saving measures, including CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation).

CDPH found that on July 6, 2024, at 5:27 p.m., Resident 1 slumped forward in his wheelchair during dinner in the dining room and stopped responding. Video reviewed by inspectors showed CNA 5 performing the Heimlich maneuver. According to the 2567 report, a licensed vocational nurse told CNA 5 to wheel him back to his room so CPR could be done there. A crash cart arrived at 5:35 p.m. and CPR began, and paramedics arrived at 5:43 p.m. Inspectors found an eight-minute delay in starting CPR and that staff did not call 911 as soon as he was found unresponsive. He was pronounced dead at the facility at 6:03 p.m.

CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $60,000 penalty. The federal 2567 report cites F678 (severity J), on CPR. According to the 2567 report, inspectors called an immediate jeopardy on July 12, 2024. The facility's removal plan included counseling the two staff members, emergency response training, training by an outside basic life support instructor, taking four nurses and CNAs with lapsed CPR cards off the schedule until they were recertified, and monthly mock code drills. The immediate jeopardy was removed on July 16, 2024.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

June 2024: F689 (severity J) after a resident at high risk for elopement climbed a patio fence and left the facility

According to the 2567 report, Resident 1 was a man under a conservatorship (a court-appointed person manages his affairs). In March 2024 he had tried to leave the facility by climbing over a patio fence. Inspectors found that the care plan written after that attempt had no interventions to prevent elopement (leaving without the facility's knowledge), and that two of his elopement risk assessments did not actually assess that risk.

Inspectors found that on June 16, 2024, at 8:49 p.m., Resident 1 opened a door to a patio, staff did not respond to the door alarm, and he climbed over the fence. He left at 8:51 p.m. and, as of July 8, 2024, had not been found. The report states this placed him at risk of exposure to rain or cold, injury from traffic, medical complications from going without his prescribed medications, malnutrition, dehydration and possible death. Inspectors found the facility failed to supervise him on the patio, did not assess him accurately, and did not follow its own elopement risk assessment policy.

The 2567 report cites F689 (severity J), on accident hazards, supervision and assistive devices. Inspectors called an immediate jeopardy on June 21, 2024. According to the report, the facility's removal plan included staff assigned to watch exit zones every shift, hourly location logs for high-risk residents, camera monitors at each nursing station, sound alarms on the doors, mesh around the patio fence, and a quote to make the fence taller. The immediate jeopardy was removed on June 24, 2024.

↑ Back to this finding in the timeline

↑ Back to contents

Complaints against Intercommunity Care Center

YearIntakesComplaintsFacility-reported incidentsSubstantiated (at least one allegation)
202310827
20242518715
202512935
20265321

Cal Health Find lists 52 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes for this facility from 2023 through October 30, 2026. CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 28 of them. 15 intakes involved an allegation in CDPH’s abuse category, and 8 of those had an abuse allegation substantiated. An intake can contain several allegations; “unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence, not that nothing happened.

↑ Back to contents

Sexual abuse reports at Intercommunity Care Center

Cal Health Find lists 1 intake for Intercommunity Care Center from 2023 through October 30, 2026 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse (1 from complaints and 0 reported by the facility itself). CDPH substantiated a sexual abuse allegation in 0 of them. Federal rules require a nursing home to report an abuse allegation to the state within two hours, so a facility-reported incident means staff raised the allegation, not that it was proven. “Unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence; it does not mean nothing happened.

YearIntakes with a sexual abuse allegationSubstantiated
202510

Warning signs include bruising or bleeding in the genital area or inner thighs, a new genital infection, torn or stained underclothing, and a resident who suddenly fears a particular staff member or resists being bathed or changed. If you suspect sexual abuse, call 911 or local police first, ask that the resident not be bathed before a medical exam, and then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman. Sexual abuse reports at Los Angeles County nursing homes →

↑ Back to contents

Staffing at Intercommunity Care Center

Payroll records Intercommunity Care Center filed with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for April through June 2026 show an average of 3.97 nursing hours per resident per day, counting registered nurses (RNs), licensed vocational nurses and nurse aides. The California average CMS published for the same period is 4.54, and the Los Angeles County median is 4.32. RN time averaged 0.17 hours per resident per day (California average 0.68). Staffing averaged 3.77 hours on weekends and 4.05 on weekdays.

CMS reports nursing staff turnover of 31.6% at this facility (California average 36.6%) and RN turnover of 50.0% (California average 37.8%).

California requires most skilled nursing facilities to provide at least 3.5 direct care hours per patient day (Health and Safety Code section 1276.65). Counting the RN, LVN and nurse aide hours in the same payroll data, Intercommunity Care Center was below 3.5 on 17 of 91 days. This is our calculation from CMS data, not a CDPH finding: CDPH counts some staff differently (for example psychiatric technicians in special treatment programs) and can grant waivers.

Intercommunity Care CenterLA County medianCalifornia average
Total nursing hours per resident per day3.974.324.54
RN hours per resident per day0.170.460.68
Weekend nursing hours per resident per day3.773.894.10
Nursing staff turnover31.6%34.1%36.6%

Compare staffing, profits and fines across Los Angeles County nursing homes →

↑ Back to contents

Who owns Intercommunity Care Center

The owners and operators below are listed for Intercommunity Care Center in the federal CMS nursing home ownership file (data as of October 1, 2026). CMS requires each Medicare-certified nursing home to report anyone with a 5% or greater ownership stake and anyone with operational or managerial control.

Owner or operatorRoleShareSince
Intercommunity Care Centers, Inc.5% or greater direct ownership100%August 15, 1986
Intercommunity Care Centers, Inc.Operational or managerial control–August 19, 1986
John HughesOperational or managerial control–January 1, 2004
Amy LevequeOperational or managerial control–June 18, 2024
Ronald PhilippOperational or managerial control–February 1, 2000
Reylon TiplesOperational or managerial control–July 16, 2019

In its annual report to the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) for the year ending December 31, 2025, the facility listed $960,000 in payments to related companies (businesses that share owners or management with the facility): $960,000 to Intercommunity Care Center, Inc for administrative expense:6911000 ? corporate allocation expense. Payments to related companies are legal; California requires nursing homes to disclose them.

↑ Back to contents

Intercommunity Care Center finances

Intercommunity Care Center reported $14.1 million in health care revenue and a net loss of $335,138 for the year ending December 31, 2025, a margin of -2.4%, in its annual financial report to HCAI (as submitted; HCAI has not finished reviewing it). The median operating margin that year was 5.9% for Los Angeles County nursing homes and 6.1% statewide. Medi-Cal paid for 93% of resident days. Salaries for RNs, LVNs and nurse aides came to $4.9 million.

YearRevenueNet incomeMarginOccupancyMedi-Cal days
2023$10.8 million-$735,799-6.8%82%–
2024$12.1 million-$1.9 million-15.7%87%91%
2025$14.1 million-$335,138-2.4%97%93%

↑ Back to contents

Federal fines and penalties: Intercommunity Care Center

CMS lists Intercommunity Care Center as a candidate for its Special Focus Facility program. CMS created the program for nursing homes with a history of serious quality problems; candidates are facilities whose inspection record qualifies them, and states choose which ones enter the program for closer oversight.

CMS lists 5 federal fines totaling $256,751 and 2 Medicare payment denials for Intercommunity Care Center in the roughly three years its penalty file covers.

DatePenaltyAmount or length
August 12, 2026Fine$100,716
January 23, 2026Fine$10,358
February 25, 2025Fine$17,345
November 21, 2024Fine$12,048
November 21, 2024Payment denial27 days
May 10, 2024Fine$116,284
May 10, 2024Payment denial54 days

↑ Back to contents

Intercommunity Care Center lawsuits and criminal cases

We searched California Attorney General and Los Angeles County District Attorney announcements and news coverage for Intercommunity Care Center and its licensee and found no public criminal case or civil lawsuit we could tie to this facility as of October 30, 2026. Many civil cases settle quietly or are not covered by the press, so this is not a complete court search.

↑ Back to contents

What this record means for your family

California uses classes for state citations. Under Health and Safety Code section 1424 ↗, a Class AA citation is a Class A violation that CDPH determined was a direct proximate cause of a resident’s death. A Class A citation means CDPH found an imminent danger, or a substantial probability, that death or serious physical harm would result. Class B covers violations with a direct or immediate relationship to residents’ health, safety or security.

Federal deficiencies carry a letter from A to L. G, H and I mean inspectors found actual harm to residents; J, K and L mean immediate jeopardy, the most serious level. F600 is the federal rule that residents be free from abuse and neglect; F609 and F610 cover reporting and investigating allegations; F689 covers accidents and supervision; F686 covers pressure injuries.

Warning signs worth asking about: unexplained bruises or fractures, new bed sores, sudden weight loss or dehydration, a resident who becomes fearful or withdrawn around certain staff, and calls that go unanswered.

↑ Back to contents

What to do now

Free nursing home case review

We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

No fees or costs unless we win

↑ Back to contents

Questions families ask

Has Intercommunity Care Center been cited by the State of California?

Cal Health Find lists 13 state citations for Intercommunity Care Center since 2023, including 0 Class AA and 5 Class A. Each one is listed in the timeline above with a link to the CDPH record.

How many complaints have been filed against Intercommunity Care Center?

From 2023 through October 30, 2026, Cal Health Find lists 52 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes, and CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 28 of them.

Does Medicare flag Intercommunity Care Center for abuse?

Yes. As of our data date, Medicare Care Compare shows its abuse icon for Intercommunity Care Center. CMS uses the icon for facilities cited for abuse that harmed a resident in the past year, or cited for abuse with potential harm in each of the past two years.

Have there been sexual abuse reports at Intercommunity Care Center?

Cal Health Find lists 1 complaint or facility-reported incident intake at Intercommunity Care Center since 2023 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse, and CDPH substantiated 0. The section above breaks them down by year.

Where can I read reviews and complaints about Intercommunity Care Center?

Online reviews are opinions. The official record is the state and federal inspection file: this page summarizes it and links each citation, complaint outcome and inspection report on Cal Health Find and Medicare Care Compare, so you can read the source yourself.

How many beds does Intercommunity Care Center have?

Intercommunity Care Center is licensed by CDPH for 147 beds and has a CMS overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

Who owns or operates Intercommunity Care Center?

CDPH lists the licensee as INTERCOMMUNITY CARE CENTERS, INC.. CMS does not list a chain for this facility. According to the CMS ownership file, Intercommunity Care Centers, Inc. holds 100% as a direct owner. The full list of owners and operators CMS reports is in the ownership section of this page.

How many nursing hours does Intercommunity Care Center provide per resident?

Payroll data the facility filed with CMS for April through June 2026 show 3.97 total nursing hours per resident per day, including 0.17 RN hours. The California average is 4.54.

My parent was hurt at Intercommunity Care Center. What should I do?

Get medical care first, then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman, ask for the chart in writing and keep notes and photos. For a free, confidential review of a possible case, call Beverly Law at (310) 552-6959.

Ask a question

Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.

BEVERLY LAW · NURSING HOME ABUSE ATTORNEYS

Hurt at Intercommunity Care Center? — Beverly Law

If your loved one was hurt at Intercommunity Care Center, talk to a California elder abuse attorney. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

✓Free consultation✓No fees or costs unless we win✓English y Español✓Available 24/7

↑ Back to contents

Other nursing homes near Intercommunity Care Center

FacilityCityDistanceCMS starsClass AA/AFederal G–L
Long Beach Care CenterLong Beach0.1 mi2/513
Ocean Ridge Post AcuteLong Beach1.1 mi3/524
Coral Cove Post AcuteLong Beach1.2 mi1/578
Courtyard Care CenterSignal Hill1.5 mi3/500
Shoreline Healthcare CenterLong Beach1.5 mi3/533
Marlora Post Acute Rehabilitation HospitalLong Beach1.5 mi1/512

↑ Back to contents

Methodology and sources

We pulled this facility’s complaints, state enforcement actions and survey deficiencies from Cal Health Find for 2023 through October 30, 2026, downloaded the CDPH citation notices and CMS-2567 reports behind every Class AA or A citation and every federal deficiency at level G or higher, and wrote the summaries above from those documents. Facility details come from the CDPH licensing file and the CMS Provider Data Catalog. Residents are described only as the government documents describe them. See the methodology page to report an error; we review correction requests within five business days.

Sources

  1. Cal Health Find – Intercommunity Care Center
  2. Medicare Care Compare – Intercommunity Care Center
  3. CMS – Payroll-Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing (2026 Q2)
  4. CMS – Nursing home Provider Information (staffing, turnover)
  5. CMS – Nursing home Ownership
  6. CMS – Nursing home Penalties
  7. HCAI – Long-Term Care Facility Financial Data
  8. CDPH – State Enforcement Actions (open data)
  9. CMS Provider Data Catalog – Nursing homes

Important: This page reports findings from public records of the California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. A citation or deficiency is a regulatory finding by a government agency; it is not a court judgment and not proof of civil or criminal liability. Criminal defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. Lawsuit allegations are claims, not findings. This page is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with Beverly Law. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Data as of: October 30, 2026. Methodology and corrections.

↑ Back to contents

☰ Contents
×

Free nursing home case review

We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.

No fees or costs unless we win
© 2026 Beverly Law. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Free consultation
No fees or costs unless we win
Call Now · 24/7
4.8 out of 5 · 604 Google reviews
Skip to content