Is your loved one at Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab?
If they fell, developed a bed sore, lost weight, were hurt or abused at Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab, leave your name and phone. We call back today, request the chart and the full inspection file, and tell you plainly whether there is a case. Free, confidential, English or Spanish.
Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win
Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab at a glance: owner, beds and ratings
* California separately requires at least 3.5 direct care service hours per patient day, counted under state rules, so the two numbers are not measured the same way.
Records: Cal Health Find ↗ · Medicare Care Compare ↗
Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab citations and inspection findings
Newest first. State citations come from CDPH; federal deficiencies come from the CMS-2567 inspection report CDPH writes for Medicare. Every row links to the government record.
| Date | Source | Finding | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| July 31, 2026 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000 Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 11, 2026 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F678 – Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) , severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| May 14, 2026 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $60,000 Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| March 27, 2026 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F678 – Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| September 12, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $3,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| September 12, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000 Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| September 10, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Other), penalty $3,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| July 28, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Certification | F607 – Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies, severity E (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern) F684 – Quality of Care, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) F610 – Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violation, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| November 27, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000 Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| October 9, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F742 – Treatment/Srvcs Mental/Psychoscial Concerns, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) AbuseSexual abuse allegation › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| September 25, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Patient Care), penalty $2,400 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 13, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F684 – Quality of Care, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
Show 2 older findings
| Date | Source | Finding | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| February 9, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| December 8, 2023 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F695 – Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
What inspectors found at Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab
Tap a finding to read the summary. Each one is written from the government report linked under it.
July 2026: Class A citation and F678 (severity J) after a delay in starting CPR
According to the citation, Resident 1, an 83-year-old man with heart conditions including atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) and heart failure, had a Full Code order, meaning staff were to attempt CPR if his heart stopped. In May 2026, CNA 1 brought his breakfast at about 7:30 a.m. and he did not respond. CNA 1 told inspectors she shook him for about five minutes but did not check his breathing or pulse and did not start CPR because she thought he was sleeping.
Inspectors found CNA 1 then called CNA 2, who also shook him without checking his pulse or breathing and left to get the crash cart, which took three to five minutes. CPR started when LVN 3 gave instructions after nurses arrived. CDPH found CPR did not begin until 8 to 10 minutes after Resident 1 was found unresponsive, and that the facility did not follow its own CPR policy. According to the citation, a nursing note said CNA 1 started CPR immediately, but CNA 1 and CNA 2 told inspectors the note did not match what happened.
CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty. The 2567 report states the federal deficiency was F678 (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) at severity J, that paramedics pronounced Resident 1 dead about 40 minutes after he was found, and that the delay "potentially contributed" to his death. The 2567 report states the facility's Immediate Jeopardy removal plan included retraining nurses, CNAs and therapy staff with hands-on demonstrations, one-on-one retraining for the CNA on duty, a code status audit, a mock code drill and outside CPR training.
May 2026: Class A citation and F678 (severity J) after delays in CPR and calling 911
According to the citation, Resident 1, a 94-year-old man with kidney failure and other conditions, had orders requiring CPR if his heart stopped. At about 10:30 p.m. one night in March 2026, CNA 1 found him unresponsive, not breathing and without a pulse. CDPH investigated after a complaint that a delayed emergency response led to the resident's death.
CDPH found that CNA 1, who was CPR certified, did not start CPR or stay with Resident 1. Inspectors found LVN 1 and RN 1 delayed CPR by first checking his blood pressure, oxygen level and eyes and performing a sternal rub (a pain test on the breastbone). According to the citation, 911 was called at 10:37 p.m., paramedics reached his bedside at 10:49 p.m., and Resident 1 was pronounced dead at 11:12 p.m. The department determined the facility did not follow its own CPR policy, which required staff to call a code blue, call 911 and begin basic life support right away.
CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $60,000 penalty. The 2567 report states the federal deficiency was F678 (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) at severity J and that 53 residents with full code status were at risk. Inspectors called an Immediate Jeopardy. The 2567 report states the removal plan included retraining 33 licensed nurses and 43 CNAs on starting CPR at once, calling 911 and never leaving an unresponsive resident alone, one-on-one retraining for LVN 1 and CNA 1, a code status audit, and shift huddles to share code status.
July 2025: F684 (severity G), F607 (severity E), F609 (severity D) and F610 (severity D) after an ordered urine test was not done
The 2567 report states that Resident 100 was admitted in June 2025 with a fracture at the base of the spine, respiratory failure and chronic kidney disease. In early July 2025, staff documented a change of condition: the resident was more confused, was cursing and yelling at staff, and was refusing care and breathing treatments. The physician was notified and ordered a urinalysis with culture (a urine test for bacteria) to check for a urinary tract infection, to be collected three days later.
Inspectors found the urine sample was never collected and the physician was not told. According to the 2567 report, LVN 1 said the night shift registered nurse supervisor did not print the order in the lab requisition book or pass it on to the day shift. Inspectors found the facility did not follow its own lab and diagnostic test policy. Two days after the scheduled collection date, the resident was sent to an acute care hospital for evaluation and treatment of her behavior. The 2567 report states the hospital found pyuria (pus in the urine), diagnosed an acute urinary tract infection and treated it with intravenous antibiotics, and the resident stayed about two weeks.
The 2567 report states the federal deficiency for this finding was F684 (quality of care) at severity G. The same survey also cited F607 (developing and implementing abuse and neglect policies) at severity E, F609 (reporting of alleged violations) at severity D, and F610 (investigating, preventing and correcting alleged violations) at severity D. The full narrative is in the linked report.
October 2024: F742 (severity J) and F600 (severity J) after a resident sexually assaulted his roommate twice
The 2567 report states that Resident 1 was admitted in August 2024 with schizophrenia (a chronic mental illness), disorganized thinking, and a history of aggressive and sexually inappropriate behavior. Before admission, he had been treated with 350 mg a day of Clozapine, a drug for schizophrenia. Inspectors found the facility did not have him evaluated by a psychiatrist on admission, did not review his prior Clozapine treatment or tell his physician about it, and did not assess his psychiatric needs. According to the 2567 report, he received no treatment or medication for schizophrenia from admission until October 2024.
Inspectors found that in October 2024, CNA 1 saw Resident 1 sexually assaulting his roommate, Resident 2, and separated them but did not keep watching Resident 1. A few minutes later, CNA 2 saw Resident 1 sexually assaulting Resident 2 a second time. The 2567 report states the CNAs did not follow the facility's policy that residents be kept apart when the suspected perpetrator is a resident.
The 2567 report states the federal deficiencies were F742 (treatment and services for mental and psychosocial concerns) at severity J and F600 (freedom from abuse and neglect) at severity J. CDPH called an Immediate Jeopardy. According to the 2567 report, Resident 1 was sent to a hospital for psychiatric evaluation and discharged from the facility, and Resident 2 was evaluated at a hospital and seen by a psychologist and a psychiatrist. The removal plan included resident interviews about abuse, a review of residents with psychiatric diagnoses, and abuse prevention training for 134 staff.
August 2024: F684 (severity G) after staff did not monitor a resident's urine output
The 2567 report states that Resident 1 was admitted in August 2024 with cancer that had spread to the brain, acute kidney failure, and benign prostatic hypertrophy (an enlarged prostate that can make it hard to empty the bladder). His care plan called for staff to watch for and report decreased urine output. Inspectors found the facility's records showed how much fluid he drank over four days but had no documentation of his urine output.
Inspectors found that CNA 2 and CNA 3 did not tell licensed nurses that his diaper stayed dry during their shifts, and that licensed nurses did not assess him for pain, a swollen bladder or urinary retention (inability to empty the bladder). According to the 2567 report, the nurses relied on CNAs to report signs they were not trained to detect, and the facility did not follow its own policy on monitoring fluid intake and output. LVN 1 told inspectors that if a resident's diaper stayed dry for four hours or more, she would check for bladder swelling and inform the physician.
The 2567 report states that Resident 1 had no documented urine output for over 24 hours. Five days after admission he had a seizure and was taken by 911 to an acute care hospital. There he was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection, severe sepsis (a body-wide reaction to infection) and urinary retention, with 1,900 milliliters of urine in his bladder, and was admitted to intensive care. His kidney function returned to normal after a catheter was placed. The 2567 report states the federal deficiency was F684 (quality of care) at severity G.
February 2024: Class A citation and F695 (severity G) after a resident did not receive ordered oxygen and CPAP
According to the citation, Resident 1, a 78-year-old man, was admitted in November 2023 with obstructive sleep apnea (blocked breathing during sleep) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease that blocks airflow). His physician ordered oxygen at 5 liters per minute continuously to keep his oxygen level above 92 percent, and a CPAP machine (a device that keeps the airway open during sleep) every night.
CDPH found licensed nurses did not give oxygen at the ordered rate, did not put him on the CPAP machine every night, and did not notify his physician when his oxygen level fell below 92 percent. Inspectors found nursing notes showed staff gave oxygen at 4, 3 and 2 liters per minute without a physician's order, and that his oxygen level was recorded at 87, 82 and 81 percent on different days. The director of nursing told inspectors licensed staff removed the CPAP and gave oxygen through a nasal tube instead, and that the physician was not told.
According to the citation, one week after admission Resident 1 was sent to an acute care hospital for shortness of breath and a low oxygen level. He was in the intensive care unit for 15 days and was later hospitalized again for another 15 days. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty. The 2567 report states the federal deficiency was F695 (respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and suctioning) at severity G.
Complaints against Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab
| Year | Intakes | Complaints | Facility-reported incidents | Substantiated (at least one allegation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 11 |
| 2024 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 11 |
| 2025 | 37 | 29 | 8 | 7 |
| 2026 | 38 | 27 | 11 | 3 |
Cal Health Find lists 119 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes for this facility from 2023 through October 30, 2026. CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 32 of them. 29 intakes involved an allegation in CDPH’s abuse category, and 4 of those had an abuse allegation substantiated. An intake can contain several allegations; “unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence, not that nothing happened.
Sexual abuse reports at Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab
Cal Health Find lists 2 intakes for Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab from 2023 through October 30, 2026 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse (0 from complaints and 2 reported by the facility itself). CDPH substantiated a sexual abuse allegation in 0 of them. Federal rules require a nursing home to report an abuse allegation to the state within two hours, so a facility-reported incident means staff raised the allegation, not that it was proven. “Unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence; it does not mean nothing happened.
| Year | Intakes with a sexual abuse allegation | Substantiated |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2 | 0 |
Cited findings on this page whose government reports describe a sexual abuse allegation: October 2024: F742 (severity J) and F600 (severity J) after a resident sexually assaulted his roommate twice
Warning signs include bruising or bleeding in the genital area or inner thighs, a new genital infection, torn or stained underclothing, and a resident who suddenly fears a particular staff member or resists being bathed or changed. If you suspect sexual abuse, call 911 or local police first, ask that the resident not be bathed before a medical exam, and then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman. Sexual abuse reports at Los Angeles County nursing homes →
Staffing at Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab
Payroll records Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab filed with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for April through June 2026 show an average of 4.56 nursing hours per resident per day, counting registered nurses (RNs), licensed vocational nurses and nurse aides. The California average CMS published for the same period is 4.54, and the Los Angeles County median is 4.32. RN time averaged 0.40 hours per resident per day (California average 0.68). Staffing averaged 4.09 hours on weekends and 4.75 on weekdays.
CMS reports nursing staff turnover of 50.8% at this facility (California average 36.6%) and RN turnover of 33.3% (California average 37.8%).
California requires most skilled nursing facilities to provide at least 3.5 direct care hours per patient day (Health and Safety Code section 1276.65). Counting the RN, LVN and nurse aide hours in the same payroll data, Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab was below 3.5 on 0 of 91 days. This is our calculation from CMS data, not a CDPH finding: CDPH counts some staff differently (for example psychiatric technicians in special treatment programs) and can grant waivers.
| Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab | LA County median | California average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total nursing hours per resident per day | 4.56 | 4.32 | 4.54 |
| RN hours per resident per day | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.68 |
| Weekend nursing hours per resident per day | 4.09 | 3.89 | 4.10 |
| Nursing staff turnover | 50.8% | 34.1% | 36.6% |
Compare staffing, profits and fines across Los Angeles County nursing homes →
Who owns Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab
The owners and operators below are listed for Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab in the federal CMS nursing home ownership file (data as of October 1, 2026). CMS requires each Medicare-certified nursing home to report anyone with a 5% or greater ownership stake and anyone with operational or managerial control.
| Owner or operator | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen Thompson | Operational or managerial control | – | February 1, 2024 |
In its annual report to the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) for the year ending December 31, 2025, the facility listed $929,538 in payments to related companies (businesses that share owners or management with the facility): $929,538 to Aspen Healthcare Services, LLC for adm – management fee. Payments to related companies are legal; California requires nursing homes to disclose them.
Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab finances
Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab reported $15.5 million in health care revenue and a net loss of $399,003 for the year ending December 31, 2025, a margin of -2.6%, in its annual financial report to HCAI (as submitted; HCAI has not finished reviewing it). The median operating margin that year was 5.9% for Los Angeles County nursing homes and 6.1% statewide. Medi-Cal paid for 67% of resident days. Salaries for RNs, LVNs and nurse aides came to $4.0 million.
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Occupancy | Medi-Cal days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023* | $3.6 million | $2.0 million | 53.8% | 41% | – |
| 2024 | $14.4 million | -$420,927 | -2.9% | 88% | 65% |
| 2025 | $15.5 million | -$399,003 | -2.6% | 89% | 67% |
* More than one report was filed that year, usually after a change of ownership; the table shows the longest reporting period.
Federal fines and penalties: Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab
CMS lists Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab as a candidate for its Special Focus Facility program. CMS created the program for nursing homes with a history of serious quality problems; candidates are facilities whose inspection record qualifies them, and states choose which ones enter the program for closer oversight.
CMS lists 5 federal fines totaling $123,145 and 1 Medicare payment denial for Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab in the roughly three years its penalty file covers.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 17, 2026 | Fine | $17,796 |
| April 3, 2026 | Fine | $16,569 |
| August 1, 2025 | Fine | $36,767 |
| October 3, 2024 | Fine | $33,501 |
| July 12, 2024 | Fine | $18,512 |
| July 12, 2024 | Payment denial | 3 days |
Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab lawsuits and criminal cases
We searched California Attorney General and Los Angeles County District Attorney announcements and news coverage for Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab and its licensee and found no public criminal case or civil lawsuit we could tie to this facility as of October 30, 2026. Many civil cases settle quietly or are not covered by the press, so this is not a complete court search.
What this record means for your family
California uses classes for state citations. Under Health and Safety Code section 1424 ↗, a Class AA citation is a Class A violation that CDPH determined was a direct proximate cause of a resident’s death. A Class A citation means CDPH found an imminent danger, or a substantial probability, that death or serious physical harm would result. Class B covers violations with a direct or immediate relationship to residents’ health, safety or security.
Federal deficiencies carry a letter from A to L. G, H and I mean inspectors found actual harm to residents; J, K and L mean immediate jeopardy, the most serious level. F600 is the federal rule that residents be free from abuse and neglect; F609 and F610 cover reporting and investigating allegations; F689 covers accidents and supervision; F686 covers pressure injuries.
Warning signs worth asking about: unexplained bruises or fractures, new bed sores, sudden weight loss or dehydration, a resident who becomes fearful or withdrawn around certain staff, and calls that go unanswered.
What to do now
- If someone is in danger, call 911.
- File a complaint with CDPH about Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab: CDPH complaint form ↗
- Contact the long-term care ombudsman, the state-funded advocate for nursing home residents: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman ↗
- Ask the facility in writing for a copy of the resident’s chart, and write down dates, names of staff on shift, and photos of any injury.
- Talk to a Los Angeles nursing home abuse lawyer →
Free nursing home case review
We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.
Questions families ask
Has Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab been cited by the State of California?
Cal Health Find lists 9 state citations for Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab since 2023, including 0 Class AA and 3 Class A. Each one is listed in the timeline above with a link to the CDPH record.
How many complaints have been filed against Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab?
From 2023 through October 30, 2026, Cal Health Find lists 119 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes, and CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 32 of them.
Does Medicare flag Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab for abuse?
As of our data date, Medicare Care Compare does not show its abuse icon for Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab. The icon is only one signal; read the citations above.
Have there been sexual abuse reports at Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab?
Cal Health Find lists 2 complaint or facility-reported incident intakes at Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab since 2023 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse, and CDPH substantiated 0. The section above breaks them down by year.
Where can I read reviews and complaints about Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab?
Online reviews are opinions. The official record is the state and federal inspection file: this page summarizes it and links each citation, complaint outcome and inspection report on Cal Health Find and Medicare Care Compare, so you can read the source yourself.
How many beds does Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab have?
Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab is licensed by CDPH for 99 beds and has a CMS overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars.
Who owns or operates Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab?
CDPH lists the licensee as ASLB, LLC. CMS lists the facility under the chain or affiliated entity Aspen Skilled Healthcare. The CMS ownership file lists Thompson, Stephen among the owners or operators. The full list is in the ownership section of this page.
How many nursing hours does Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab provide per resident?
Payroll data the facility filed with CMS for April through June 2026 show 4.56 total nursing hours per resident per day, including 0.40 RN hours. The California average is 4.54.
My parent was hurt at Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab. What should I do?
Get medical care first, then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman, ask for the chart in writing and keep notes and photos. For a free, confidential review of a possible case, call Beverly Law at (310) 552-6959.
Ask a question
Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.
Hurt at Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab? — Beverly Law
If your loved one was hurt at Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab, talk to a California elder abuse attorney. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.
Other nursing homes near Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab
| Facility | City | Distance | CMS stars | Class AA/A | Federal G–L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catered Manor Care Center | Long Beach | 0.4 mi | 3/5 | 4 | 3 |
| Pacific Villa, Inc. | Long Beach | 0.7 mi | 2/5 | 1 | 2 |
| Long Beach Healthcare Center | Long Beach | 0.7 mi | 1/5 | 4 | 4 |
| Pacific Care Nursing Center | Long Beach | 0.8 mi | 2/5 | 2 | 3 |
| The Beach Post-Acute | Long Beach | 1.4 mi | 2/5 | 2 | 2 |
| Beachside Post Acute | Long Beach | 1.8 mi | 4/5 | 0 | 0 |
Methodology and sources
We pulled this facility’s complaints, state enforcement actions and survey deficiencies from Cal Health Find for 2023 through October 30, 2026, downloaded the CDPH citation notices and CMS-2567 reports behind every Class AA or A citation and every federal deficiency at level G or higher, and wrote the summaries above from those documents. Facility details come from the CDPH licensing file and the CMS Provider Data Catalog. Residents are described only as the government documents describe them. See the methodology page to report an error; we review correction requests within five business days.
Sources
- Cal Health Find – Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab
- Medicare Care Compare – Bixby Towers Post-Acute Rehab
- CMS – Payroll-Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing (2026 Q2)
- CMS – Nursing home Provider Information (staffing, turnover)
- CMS – Nursing home Ownership
- CMS – Nursing home Penalties
- HCAI – Long-Term Care Facility Financial Data
- CDPH – State Enforcement Actions (open data)
- CMS Provider Data Catalog – Nursing homes
Important: This page reports findings from public records of the California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. A citation or deficiency is a regulatory finding by a government agency; it is not a court judgment and not proof of civil or criminal liability. Criminal defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. Lawsuit allegations are claims, not findings. This page is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with Beverly Law. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Data as of: October 30, 2026. Methodology and corrections.
☰ Contents