Is your loved one at Imperial Care Center?
If they fell, developed a bed sore, lost weight, were hurt or abused at Imperial Care Center, leave your name and phone. We call back today, request the chart and the full inspection file, and tell you plainly whether there is a case. Free, confidential, English or Spanish.
Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win
Imperial Care Center at a glance: owner, beds and ratings
* California separately requires at least 3.5 direct care service hours per patient day, counted under state rules, so the two numbers are not measured the same way.
Records: Cal Health Find ↗ · Medicare Care Compare ↗
Imperial Care Center citations and inspection findings
Newest first. State citations come from CDPH; federal deficiencies come from the CMS-2567 inspection report CDPH writes for Medicare. Every row links to the government record.
| Date | Source | Finding | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| October 8, 2026 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Staffing), penalty $1,500 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| September 10, 2026 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Patient Rights), penalty $3,000 | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| May 22, 2026 | State (CDPH) | Class A citation (Patient Care), penalty $25,000 Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| October 17, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B Trebled citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $9,000 Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| August 6, 2025 | State (CDPH) | Class B citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $3,000 Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| July 23, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 16, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Certification | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 5, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| April 25, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) Falls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| January 31, 2025 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| December 13, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| October 18, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
Show 14 older findings
| Date | Source | Finding | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 21, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class B Trebled citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $9,000 Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| May 3, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity J (immediate jeopardy, one or a few residents) Abuse Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| May 2, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class A Trebled citation (Patient Care), penalty $75,000, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| May 2, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class A Trebled citation (Patient Care), penalty $75,000, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| May 2, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class A Trebled citation (Patient Care), penalty $75,000, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| March 21, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F690 – Bowel/Bladder Incontinence, Catheter, UTI, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| February 8, 2024 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity K (immediate jeopardy, a pattern) F610 – Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violation, severity E (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern) F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity K (immediate jeopardy, a pattern) AbuseFalls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| January 26, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class A Trebled citation (Patient Care), penalty $60,000, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| January 26, 2024 | State (CDPH) | Class B Trebled citation (Abuse/Facility Not Self Reported), penalty $9,000 Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| December 7, 2023 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) F689 – Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) AbuseFalls / supervision › Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| November 9, 2023 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) Abuse Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| June 9, 2023 | State (CDPH) | Class A Trebled citation (Patient Care), penalty $75,000, appealed by the facility Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| May 18, 2023 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F600 – Free from Abuse and Neglect, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) Abuse | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
| April 10, 2023 | Federal (CMS-2567), Complaint | F603 – Free from Involuntary Seclusion, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) F740 – Behavioral Health Services, severity G (actual harm, one or a few residents) F609 – Reporting of Alleged Violations, severity D (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated) F607 – Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies, severity E (no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern) Abuse Read what inspectors found ↓ | Government record (CDPH) ↗ |
What inspectors found at Imperial Care Center
Tap a finding to read the summary. Each one is written from the government report linked under it.
May 2026: Class A citation after a resident fell in a hallway
CDPH investigated a facility-reported fall during an unannounced visit on April 9, 2026. According to the citation, Resident 1 was a 102-year-old woman with dementia and difficulty walking. She had been identified as a high fall risk and had fallen in the facility on February 4 and February 8, 2026. Her care plan called for a front-wheel walker, encouragement to use a wheelchair, frequent visual monitoring and an assistive device. Her assessment showed she needed supervision or touching assistance from staff to walk.
CDPH found that the facility did not place Resident 1 in its Falling Star Program (a system that marks residents at high risk for falls) after the two February falls, as its own policy required. Inspectors found staff also did not provide the front-wheel walker that the care plan and the physical therapist recommended, did not follow the care plan's wheelchair and monitoring steps, and did not give her the walking supervision her assessment called for.
According to the citation, on March 30, 2026, at 1:45 p.m., Resident 1 fell in a hallway while walking without staff supervision and without a walker or wheelchair. She had bleeding from the bridge of the nose, a scalp laceration (a cut), a forehead hematoma (clotted blood under the skin) and facial swelling. She was later diagnosed with a nasal fracture and blunt head trauma. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty.
April 2025: F689 (severity J) after a resident left the secured facility
The 2567 report states that Resident 1 was cognitively impaired and had been admitted to a secured facility with locked doors. Inspectors found that on April 24, 2025, at 6:48 p.m., RNA 1, a restorative nurse aide, opened the facility's locked gate without checking Resident 1's identity because RNA 1 thought Resident 1 was a visitor. Resident 1 then left the building.
Inspectors found the facility failed to provide supervision and to prevent the elopement (leaving without supervision or permission). The 2567 report states this placed Resident 1 at risk of a traffic accident on a busy street, of missing medications, and of exposure to heat and cold that could lead to serious injury, harm or death. The next day, a registered nurse, a licensed vocational nurse and two police officers found Resident 1 at the resident's apartment about 7.8 miles away and brought the resident back. Staff noted a scab on the left knee, and Resident 1 was sent to an acute care hospital for evaluation that evening.
The 2567 report states the state survey agency called an Immediate Jeopardy on April 26, 2025, and the deficiency was cited as F689 at severity J. The facility's accepted removal plan included suspending RNA 1 pending investigation, training staff on supervision, elopement and resident identification, checking that residents wore ID wristbands, photographing residents for their records, and assigning staff to watch the reception area. Inspectors found the plan in place and removed the Immediate Jeopardy on April 27, 2025.
May 2024: F600 (severity J) after a nursing assistant was seen hitting a resident
The 2567 report states that on May 1, 2024, at 5:30 p.m., a student nurse walked into Resident 1's room and saw CNA 1, a certified nursing assistant, slapping and punching Resident 1 on the arms and back. Resident 1 had dementia and severely impaired cognition. Inspectors found the facility did not follow its own abuse prevention policies, did not make sure CNA 1 had received abuse training, and did not protect Resident 1 from physical abuse by CNA 1.
Because of Resident 1's cognitive impairment, inspectors applied the reasonable person concept and found that a person subjected to this kind of abuse could feel hopelessness, helplessness and humiliation. The 2567 report states the state survey agency called an Immediate Jeopardy on May 9, 2024, and cited F600 at severity J.
According to the 2567 report, the facility's accepted removal plan included a head-to-toe assessment of Resident 1, which found no signs of physical trauma, and visits from a psychiatrist and a psychologist. A family member was notified, and CNA 1 was terminated on May 9, 2024. The plan also listed abuse prevention training for all 150 staff members, interviews with all 117 residents with no new reports of abuse, a review of employee files for abuse training, and daily room rounds by department managers. Inspectors found the plan in place and removed the Immediate Jeopardy on May 10, 2024.
May 2024: Class A citation, trebled, and F600 (severity K) after a resident was pushed by another resident
CDPH made an unannounced visit on February 8, 2024, to investigate a facility-reported incident about abuse and quality of care. According to the citation, Resident 1 was a 53-year-old woman with dementia who was confused, at high risk for falls and had wandering behavior. CDPH found the facility did not give her supervision, redirection and monitoring, did not follow its policies on wandering, falls, supervision and abuse prevention, and did not protect her from physical abuse by another resident, Resident 2.
According to the citation, on February 1, 2024, at 5:10 p.m., Resident 1 tried to enter Resident 2's room and Resident 2 pushed her out. She fell backward onto the hallway floor and hit the back of her head. At an acute care hospital she was diagnosed with blunt head trauma and an acute on chronic subdural hematoma (bleeding between the brain and its covering). Resident 2's care plan listed aggressive behavior, and his records show he later said he pushed another resident. The director of nursing told inspectors the facility reported the injury as an unwitnessed fall and not as resident-to-resident abuse, because its own investigation found it was not abuse.
CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty that was trebled to $75,000. In the related federal survey, inspectors found the facility failed to protect several residents from neglect and physical abuse, including this incident, and cited F600 at severity K.
May 2024: Class A citation, trebled, and F689 and F600 (severity K) after a resident's 11th fall
During an unannounced visit on February 8, 2024, CDPH investigated a facility-reported incident about abuse and quality of care. According to the citation, Resident 8 was a 95-year-old woman with dementia and a history of falls. Her care plans called for monitoring at frequent intervals, redirection, help with transfers and walking, and supervision while she walked.
CDPH determined the facility failed to give Resident 8 supervision, redirection and monitoring of her whereabouts, did not follow its policies on wandering, falls, accident prevention and supervision, and did not identify interventions aimed at her specific risks. According to the citation, Resident 8 fell 11 times in the facility between October 2, 2020, and February 9, 2024. After the 11th fall, on February 9, 2024, she was sent to an acute care hospital and diagnosed with a cut near her right eyebrow, small areas of subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding between the brain and the tissue that covers it), a possible small subdural hemorrhage and a scalp hematoma.
CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty trebled to $75,000. In the related federal survey, inspectors cited F689 and F600, both at severity K. The 2567 report states the state survey agency called an Immediate Jeopardy on March 18, 2024. The facility's removal plan included staff training on supervision, assigned hallway monitors, and a revised care plan for Resident 8 that placed her closer to the nurses' station and added a low bed and a floor mat. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on March 20, 2024.
May 2024: Class A citation, trebled, and F690 (severity G) after a resident with a urinary catheter developed sepsis
CDPH made an unannounced visit on March 21, 2024, to investigate a complaint about quality of care. According to the citation, Resident 1 was a 76-year-old man with diabetes, urinary retention and an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube placed in the bladder to drain urine). He could not understand or make decisions. On February 29, 2024, he pulled out his catheter and had blood in his urine. His care plan then called for watching for signs of urinary tract infection (UTI) and checking his urine for cloudiness, odor, blood and amount.
CDPH found the facility failed to accurately and continuously monitor Resident 1 for signs of UTI, and failed to monitor and document his urine so an infection could be caught and treated. According to the citation, intake and output records described his urine as yellow and clear through March 3, 2024, and there was no intake and output record for March 4.
According to the citation, on the evening of March 4, 2024, a family member found Resident 1 leaning sharply forward. His heart rate was 145 and his blood sugar was 401. Paramedics found his catheter tubing dark brown, murky and apparently clogged. At an acute care hospital he had a fever of 104 degrees and was diagnosed with severe sepsis (a life-threatening reaction to infection) and a UTI. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty trebled to $75,000, and the related federal survey cited F690 at severity G.
January 2024: Class A citation, trebled, and F689 (severity G) after a resident fell in a hallway
CDPH made an unannounced visit on December 12, 2023, to investigate a facility-reported incident about quality of care. According to the citation, Resident 4 had dementia, osteoarthritis and vertigo (dizziness), had severely impaired cognition and was assessed as a high fall risk. A physical therapy discharge summary said she needed stand-by assistance (a staff member close by in case she lost her balance) when walking, and her care plan called for frequent observation.
CDPH found the facility did not give Resident 4 the assistance and supervision called for in her assessment and care plan. Inspectors found the facility also had no policy or protocol saying how often nursing staff should check on residents at risk of falling and wandering in the hallways.
According to the citation, on November 27, 2023, at 8:30 p.m., Resident 4 fell in the hallway in front of her wheelchair. At an acute care hospital she was diagnosed with a head injury, a cut on the forehead and a left shoulder dislocation. Inspectors reviewed surveillance video with the administrator and saw that at 8:28 p.m. nursing staff were inside the nursing station and only residents were in the hallway. CNA 2, who was assigned to Resident 4, told inspectors that she and other aides were in residents' rooms and no nursing staff were in the hallway. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $20,000 penalty trebled to $60,000. The related federal survey cited F689 at severity G.
November 2023: F600 (severity G) after one resident punched another
The 2567 report states that on November 8, 2023, at 6:45 p.m., Resident 2 went into Resident 1's room while Resident 1 was lying in bed and punched him several times on the face and body. Inspectors found the facility failed to protect Resident 1's right to be free from physical abuse. Resident 1 had dementia, anxiety and depression, and his assessment showed his thinking skills were intact. Resident 2 had Alzheimer's disease and severely impaired cognition.
According to the 2567 report, CNA 1 heard yelling from the room, found Resident 2 punching Resident 1 while Resident 1 tried to block the blows, and separated the two. A licensed vocational nurse found Resident 1 tense, with redness around the right eye, and records show he was given Tylenol. The 2567 report states Resident 1 told inspectors he had asked Resident 2 to leave his room and Resident 2 began hitting him without giving him a chance to stand up or defend himself. Resident 2's records describe him as confused and aggressive, and he did not remember the incident.
Inspectors found the incident caused Resident 1 pain and anxiety and placed him at high risk of increased depression because of his diagnoses. A social services note said he felt nervous at the time and later said he felt better. The deficiency was cited as F600 at severity G.
June 2023: Class A citation, trebled, and F603 and F740 (severity G) after a resident was left alone in a dark, empty room
CDPH made an unannounced visit on April 12, 2023, to investigate a complaint related to abuse and seclusion. According to the citation, Resident 1 was an 80-year-old woman with Alzheimer's disease and several mental health conditions. She had impaired cognition, a history of falls, and episodes of agitation and getting out of her bed and wheelchair, and she needed assistance and supervision.
According to the citation, on April 12, 2023, at 1:15 a.m., Resident 1 fell out of bed. Staff sat her in her wheelchair and applied a quick release soft belt, a type of restraint. At 1:36 a.m., RN 1, a registered nurse, wheeled her into an empty, dark resident room, moved a linen cart to partly block the door and left without turning on the lights. CDPH found she stayed there until 5:58 a.m., when she wheeled herself out. The department determined she was subjected to involuntary seclusion (being kept apart from others against her will) for 4 hours and 22 minutes and was at risk for anxiety, depression and other psychosocial harm.
CDPH found the facility also failed to treat Resident 1 with dignity and respect, failed to provide behavioral health services such as psychotherapy, counseling and meaningful activities, and failed to carry out her care plans for falls, self-care, communication and behavior. CDPH issued a Class A citation with a $25,000 penalty trebled to $75,000. The related federal survey cited F603 and F740, both at severity G.
Complaints against Imperial Care Center
| Year | Intakes | Complaints | Facility-reported incidents | Substantiated (at least one allegation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 34 | 11 | 23 | 17 |
| 2024 | 36 | 17 | 19 | 17 |
| 2025 | 38 | 22 | 16 | 8 |
| 2026 | 23 | 14 | 9 | 2 |
Cal Health Find lists 131 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes for this facility from 2023 through October 30, 2026. CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 44 of them. 39 intakes involved an allegation in CDPH’s abuse category, and 12 of those had an abuse allegation substantiated. An intake can contain several allegations; “unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence, not that nothing happened.
Sexual abuse reports at Imperial Care Center
Cal Health Find lists 2 intakes for Imperial Care Center from 2023 through October 30, 2026 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse (1 from complaints and 1 reported by the facility itself). CDPH substantiated a sexual abuse allegation in 0 of them. Federal rules require a nursing home to report an abuse allegation to the state within two hours, so a facility-reported incident means staff raised the allegation, not that it was proven. “Unsubstantiated” means CDPH did not find enough evidence; it does not mean nothing happened.
| Year | Intakes with a sexual abuse allegation | Substantiated |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2 | 0 |
Warning signs include bruising or bleeding in the genital area or inner thighs, a new genital infection, torn or stained underclothing, and a resident who suddenly fears a particular staff member or resists being bathed or changed. If you suspect sexual abuse, call 911 or local police first, ask that the resident not be bathed before a medical exam, and then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman. Sexual abuse reports at Los Angeles County nursing homes →
Staffing at Imperial Care Center
Payroll records Imperial Care Center filed with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for April through June 2026 show an average of 3.89 nursing hours per resident per day, counting registered nurses (RNs), licensed vocational nurses and nurse aides. The California average CMS published for the same period is 4.54, and the Los Angeles County median is 4.32. RN time averaged 0.47 hours per resident per day (California average 0.68). Staffing averaged 3.62 hours on weekends and 4.00 on weekdays.
CMS reports nursing staff turnover of 53.0% at this facility (California average 36.6%) and RN turnover of 77.8% (California average 37.8%).
California requires most skilled nursing facilities to provide at least 3.5 direct care hours per patient day (Health and Safety Code section 1276.65). Counting the RN, LVN and nurse aide hours in the same payroll data, Imperial Care Center was below 3.5 on 22 of 91 days. This is our calculation from CMS data, not a CDPH finding: CDPH counts some staff differently (for example psychiatric technicians in special treatment programs) and can grant waivers.
| Imperial Care Center | LA County median | California average | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total nursing hours per resident per day | 3.89 | 4.32 | 4.54 |
| RN hours per resident per day | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.68 |
| Weekend nursing hours per resident per day | 3.62 | 3.89 | 4.10 |
| Nursing staff turnover | 53.0% | 34.1% | 36.6% |
Compare staffing, profits and fines across Los Angeles County nursing homes →
Who owns Imperial Care Center
The owners and operators below are listed for Imperial Care Center in the federal CMS nursing home ownership file (data as of October 1, 2026). CMS requires each Medicare-certified nursing home to report anyone with a 5% or greater ownership stake and anyone with operational or managerial control.
| Owner or operator | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Friedman Family Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership | 5% | June 30, 2023 |
| Ira D Friedman 1991 Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership | 5% | June 30, 2023 |
| Lehmann Family 1991 Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership | 5% | June 30, 2023 |
| The Klavan Family Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership | 5% | June 30, 2023 |
| The Tzippy Friedman Notis 1990 Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership | 5% | June 30, 2023 |
| Aaron Friedman | 5% or greater indirect ownership | 30% | June 30, 2023 |
| Rachel Klavan | 5% or greater indirect ownership | 5% | June 30, 2023 |
| Libby Lehmann | 5% or greater indirect ownership | 5% | June 30, 2023 |
| Shmuel Notis | 5% or greater indirect ownership | 5% | June 30, 2023 |
| Devinder Gandhi | Operational or managerial control | – | January 22, 2004 |
| Marissa Gerolaga | Operational or managerial control | – | October 4, 2025 |
| Joshua Klavan | Operational or managerial control | – | December 1, 2022 |
| Elvira Posada Flores | Operational or managerial control | – | May 20, 2024 |
In its annual report to the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) for the year ending December 31, 2025, the facility listed $2.2 million in payments to related companies (businesses that share owners or management with the facility): $821,873 to Longwood Management LLC for management fee; $724,192 to Imperial Convalescent Hospital for rent; $290,808 to Premiere Consulting Group for workers comp; $160,074 to Premiere Consulting Group for health insurance. Payments to related companies are legal; California requires nursing homes to disclose them.
Imperial Care Center finances
Imperial Care Center reported $18.3 million in health care revenue and net income of $2.1 million for the year ending December 31, 2025, a margin of 11.6%, in its annual financial report to HCAI (as submitted; HCAI has not finished reviewing it). The median operating margin that year was 5.9% for Los Angeles County nursing homes and 6.1% statewide. Medi-Cal paid for 86% of resident days. Salaries for RNs, LVNs and nurse aides came to $4.9 million.
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Occupancy | Medi-Cal days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $11.7 million | -$2.0 million | -17.0% | 78% | – |
| 2024 | $14.5 million | -$873,907 | -6.0% | 94% | 86% |
| 2025 | $18.3 million | $2.1 million | 11.6% | 97% | 86% |
Federal fines and penalties: Imperial Care Center
CMS lists Imperial Care Center as a candidate for its Special Focus Facility program. CMS created the program for nursing homes with a history of serious quality problems; candidates are facilities whose inspection record qualifies them, and states choose which ones enter the program for closer oversight.
CMS lists 4 federal fines totaling $212,749 and 2 Medicare payment denials for Imperial Care Center in the roughly three years its penalty file covers.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 27, 2025 | Fine | $22,396 |
| May 10, 2024 | Fine | $100,975 |
| May 10, 2024 | Payment denial | 21 days |
| March 20, 2024 | Fine | $33,608 |
| March 20, 2024 | Payment denial | 2 days |
| December 12, 2023 | Fine | $55,770 |
Imperial Care Center lawsuits and criminal cases
We searched California Attorney General and Los Angeles County District Attorney announcements and news coverage for Imperial Care Center and its licensee and found no public criminal case or civil lawsuit we could tie to this facility as of October 30, 2026. Many civil cases settle quietly or are not covered by the press, so this is not a complete court search.
In the news
- November 16, 2017: The California Department of Public Health announced in November 2017 that it issued Imperial Care Center in Studio City a Class AA citation and a $100,000 fine after an investigation found deficiencies that it said contributed to a resident's death. California Department of Public Health (press release NR17-083) ↗
What this record means for your family
California uses classes for state citations. Under Health and Safety Code section 1424 ↗, a Class AA citation is a Class A violation that CDPH determined was a direct proximate cause of a resident’s death. A Class A citation means CDPH found an imminent danger, or a substantial probability, that death or serious physical harm would result. Class B covers violations with a direct or immediate relationship to residents’ health, safety or security.
Federal deficiencies carry a letter from A to L. G, H and I mean inspectors found actual harm to residents; J, K and L mean immediate jeopardy, the most serious level. F600 is the federal rule that residents be free from abuse and neglect; F609 and F610 cover reporting and investigating allegations; F689 covers accidents and supervision; F686 covers pressure injuries.
Warning signs worth asking about: unexplained bruises or fractures, new bed sores, sudden weight loss or dehydration, a resident who becomes fearful or withdrawn around certain staff, and calls that go unanswered.
What to do now
- If someone is in danger, call 911.
- File a complaint with CDPH about Imperial Care Center: CDPH complaint form ↗
- Contact the long-term care ombudsman, the state-funded advocate for nursing home residents: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman ↗
- Ask the facility in writing for a copy of the resident’s chart, and write down dates, names of staff on shift, and photos of any injury.
- Talk to a Los Angeles nursing home abuse lawyer →
Free nursing home case review
We read the inspection record and the chart with you and tell you plainly whether there is a case. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.
Questions families ask
Has Imperial Care Center been cited by the State of California?
Cal Health Find lists 14 state citations for Imperial Care Center since 2023, including 0 Class AA and 6 Class A. Each one is listed in the timeline above with a link to the CDPH record.
How many complaints have been filed against Imperial Care Center?
From 2023 through October 30, 2026, Cal Health Find lists 131 complaint and facility-reported incident intakes, and CDPH substantiated at least one allegation in 44 of them.
Does Medicare flag Imperial Care Center for abuse?
As of our data date, Medicare Care Compare does not show its abuse icon for Imperial Care Center. The icon is only one signal; read the citations above.
Have there been sexual abuse reports at Imperial Care Center?
Cal Health Find lists 2 complaint or facility-reported incident intakes at Imperial Care Center since 2023 that included an allegation CDPH classified as sexual abuse, and CDPH substantiated 0. The section above breaks them down by year.
Where can I read reviews and complaints about Imperial Care Center?
Online reviews are opinions. The official record is the state and federal inspection file: this page summarizes it and links each citation, complaint outcome and inspection report on Cal Health Find and Medicare Care Compare, so you can read the source yourself.
How many beds does Imperial Care Center have?
Imperial Care Center is licensed by CDPH for 130 beds and has a CMS overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars.
Who owns or operates Imperial Care Center?
CDPH lists the licensee as ICC CONVALESCENT LLC. CMS lists the facility under the chain or affiliated entity Longwood Management Corporation. According to the CMS ownership file, Friedman Family Trust holds 5% as a direct owner. The full list of owners and operators CMS reports is in the ownership section of this page.
How many nursing hours does Imperial Care Center provide per resident?
Payroll data the facility filed with CMS for April through June 2026 show 3.89 total nursing hours per resident per day, including 0.47 RN hours. The California average is 4.54.
My parent was hurt at Imperial Care Center. What should I do?
Get medical care first, then report it to CDPH and the long-term care ombudsman, ask for the chart in writing and keep notes and photos. For a free, confidential review of a possible case, call Beverly Law at (310) 552-6959.
Ask a question
Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.
Hurt at Imperial Care Center? — Beverly Law
If your loved one was hurt at Imperial Care Center, talk to a California elder abuse attorney. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You pay no fees and no costs unless we win.
Other nursing homes near Imperial Care Center
| Facility | City | Distance | CMS stars | Class AA/A | Federal G–L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studio City Rehabilitation Center | Studio City | 0.0 mi | 1/5 | 2 | 3 |
| Sherman Village Healthcare Center | Valley Village | 2.1 mi | 1/5 | 3 | 3 |
| Four Seasons Healthcare & Wellness Center, LP | North Hollywood | 2.1 mi | 1/5 | 3 | 4 |
| Providence St. Elizabeth Care Center | North Hollywood | 2.2 mi | 2/5 | 1 | 4 |
| Vineland Post Acute | North Hollywood | 2.8 mi | 2/5 | 0 | 0 |
| Valley Vista Nursing and Transitional Care, LLC. | North Hollywood | 3.0 mi | 1/5 | 0 | 2 |
Methodology and sources
We pulled this facility’s complaints, state enforcement actions and survey deficiencies from Cal Health Find for 2023 through October 30, 2026, downloaded the CDPH citation notices and CMS-2567 reports behind every Class AA or A citation and every federal deficiency at level G or higher, and wrote the summaries above from those documents. Facility details come from the CDPH licensing file and the CMS Provider Data Catalog. Residents are described only as the government documents describe them. See the methodology page to report an error; we review correction requests within five business days.
Sources
- Cal Health Find – Imperial Care Center
- Medicare Care Compare – Imperial Care Center
- CMS – Payroll-Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing (2026 Q2)
- CMS – Nursing home Provider Information (staffing, turnover)
- CMS – Nursing home Ownership
- CMS – Nursing home Penalties
- HCAI – Long-Term Care Facility Financial Data
- CDPH – State Enforcement Actions (open data)
- CMS Provider Data Catalog – Nursing homes
Important: This page reports findings from public records of the California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. A citation or deficiency is a regulatory finding by a government agency; it is not a court judgment and not proof of civil or criminal liability. Criminal defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. Lawsuit allegations are claims, not findings. This page is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with Beverly Law. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Data as of: October 30, 2026. Methodology and corrections.
☰ Contents