Beverly Law — Accident AttorneysBEVERLY LAW PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEYS

Is it always the driver's fault if they hit a pedestrian?

Michael Shemtoub, trial attorney, Beverly Law
Michael Shemtoub, Beverly Law
Trial attorney · English y Español · (310) 552-6959
No. Drivers in California, Texas and Washington must use due care toward people on foot, but pedestrians have legal duties too, and a jury can split the blame between both. What that split does to your claim depends on the state: California and Washington cut your award by your share, while Texas bars recovery once your share passes 50 percent.

By Michael Shemtoub, trial attorney, Beverly Law. Updated November 2026.

Hit by a car while walking?

Leave your name and phone. We call back today, in English or Spanish. The consultation is free and confidential.

Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win

What drivers owe people on foot

Each state gives drivers a duty to yield in crosswalks and a broader duty of care everywhere else. That second duty is the reason a driver rarely escapes all blame.

Driver dutyCaliforniaTexasWashington
At a crosswalkYield to a pedestrian in a marked crosswalk or an unmarked one at an intersection, and use “all due care,” slowing as needed (Veh. Code 21950(a), (c))Where no signal operates, stop and yield to a pedestrian on the driver’s half of the road, or approaching so closely from the other half as to be in danger (Transp. Code 552.003(a))Stop and remain stopped while the pedestrian is on or within one lane of the driver’s half (RCW 46.61.235(1))
Anywhere on the roadDue care for any pedestrian on a roadway (21954(b))Due care to avoid hitting a pedestrian, horn when necessary (552.008)Due care to avoid hitting any pedestrian, horn when necessary (RCW 46.61.245)
Children and confused peopleCovered by the general duty“Proper precaution” on seeing a child or an obviously confused or incapacitated person (552.008)Same “proper precaution” rule (46.61.245)

The Texas and Washington care rules begin with “notwithstanding,” which means they apply even when the pedestrian broke another rule in the chapter. California says the same thing in its own words. Section 21950(d) says the pedestrian’s duty does not relieve a driver of due care toward anyone in a crosswalk, and Section 21954(b) says the same for pedestrians outside one.

What the law asks of pedestrians

Walkers carry duties that mirror the driver’s. The one insurers cite most is the rule against stepping out suddenly. California bars a pedestrian from suddenly leaving a curb and walking or running into the path of a vehicle “so close as to constitute an immediate hazard” (21950(b)). Texas bars the same move when the car is so close that it is impossible for the driver to stop and yield (552.003(b)), and Washington has its own version in RCW 46.61.235(2).

Other duties depend on where you were:

  • Outside a crosswalk, you must yield to vehicles. In California the duty runs to vehicles so near they are an immediate hazard (21954(a)); Texas (552.005) and Washington (RCW 46.61.240) say yield to vehicles on the roadway.
  • Where a sidewalk is available, Texas bars walking along the roadway, and without one it tells you to walk on the left, facing traffic, unless that side is unsafe (552.006). California has a similar left-edge rule outside business and residence districts (21956).
  • In Texas, you may not start across against a “Don’t Walk” or “Wait” signal (552.002(c)).

Breaking one of these rules does not end a claim. It gives the insurer a reason to argue for a percentage. Our page on jaywalking laws covers mid-block crossings in detail.

How each state splits the blame

When both people were careless, the jury assigns percentages. California adopted pure comparative negligence in Li v. Yellow Cab Co., so a pedestrian found 70 percent at fault still recovers 30 percent of the damages. Washington’s RCW 4.22.005 also reduces the award without barring it, with one exception: an injured person who was under the influence, whose impairment was a proximate cause and who is more than 50 percent at fault recovers nothing (RCW 5.40.060).

Texas draws a hard line. A claimant whose share is greater than 50 percent recovers nothing (CPRC 33.001). At 50 percent or less, the court reduces the damages by that percentage (CPRC 33.012). The same facts can produce a partial recovery in Los Angeles or Seattle and nothing in Houston. Our comparative fault guide works through the math with several defendants.

Free case review

Tell us what happened. We will tell you plainly whether there is a case and what to do next. You owe no fees or costs unless we win.

No fees or costs unless we win

The crash report is a starting point

Officers record what they think contributed to a crash, and adjusters often treat that code as the answer. In TxDOT’s 2025 contributing-factor table, “pedestrian failed to yield right of way to vehicle” appears in 2,328 crashes, 412 of them fatal, while “failed to yield ROW – to pedestrian” appears in 1,603 crashes, 23 of them fatal (TxDOT). An officer may write that code before hearing from a pedestrian who was taken away by ambulance.

Evidence can change that picture. Video from businesses, buses and doorbells shows timing. A vehicle’s event data recorder can capture “pre-crash vehicle dynamics and system status” and driver inputs, according to NHTSA. Phone records can show whether the driver was texting. Lighting, sight lines and the driver’s speed decide whether a careful driver could have seen you in time, which is the question every due care rule asks.

What this means for your case

Expect the insurer to look for something you did wrong, and do not argue about it on a recorded call. Write down where you started crossing, what the signal showed and where the car came from. Save shoes and clothing, which show what a driver could see. If you were in a crosswalk, read our pages on crosswalk crashes in California, Texas and Washington. For how fault changes the money, see what a pedestrian case is worth. Texas cases are handled by the firm’s Texas-licensed attorneys, Joyce Ondich and John Efstathiou.

Common questions

Can the pedestrian be 100 percent at fault?

Yes. If a pedestrian runs into the path of a car so close the driver had no chance to stop, a jury can find the driver was not negligent at all. That outcome turns on the evidence about distance, speed and visibility.

If I was in a crosswalk, is the driver automatically liable?

No, though the driver’s duty to yield is strong there. The insurer may argue you stepped out suddenly. The timing evidence usually settles that dispute.

Does a ticket for the driver prove fault in my claim?

It helps, but it does not decide the civil case. The jury weighs all the evidence, including your own conduct.

What if I was walking in the road because there was no sidewalk?

Texas allows it when no sidewalk is provided, as long as you walk on the left facing traffic unless that side is unsafe. California has a similar rule outside business and residence districts. Even if you broke one of these rules, drivers still owe you due care.

What if a child was hit?

Texas and Washington require drivers to take proper precaution on seeing a child on the roadway. A fault percentage is an argument, and the evidence gathered in the first days shapes it. More answers are in our injury law FAQs. Beverly Law offers a free case review in English or Spanish at (310) 552-6959. You owe no fees or costs unless we win.

Ask a question

Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.

BEVERLY LAW · PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEYS

Injury lawyer — Beverly Law

Hurt because of someone else in California, Texas and Washington? Talk to an injury attorney. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You owe no fees or costs unless we win.

✓Free consultation✓No fees or costs unless we win✓English y Español✓Available 24/7

Related pages

Injury law FAQs

Sources

  1. Cal. Veh. Code § 21950 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
  2. Cal. Veh. Code § 21954 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
  3. Cal. Veh. Code § 21956 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
  4. Tex. Transp. Code § 552.002 (statutes.capitol.texas.gov)
  5. Tex. Transp. Code § 552.003 (statutes.capitol.texas.gov)
  6. Tex. Transp. Code § 552.005 (statutes.capitol.texas.gov)
  7. Tex. Transp. Code § 552.006 (statutes.capitol.texas.gov)
  8. Tex. Transp. Code § 552.008 (statutes.capitol.texas.gov)
  9. RCW 46.61.235 (app.leg.wa.gov)
  10. RCW 46.61.240 (app.leg.wa.gov)
  11. RCW 46.61.245 (app.leg.wa.gov)
  12. Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 (Stanford SCOCAL) (scocal.stanford.edu)
  13. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.001 (statutes.capitol.texas.gov)
  14. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.012 (statutes.capitol.texas.gov)
  15. RCW 4.22.005 (app.leg.wa.gov)
  16. RCW 5.40.060 (app.leg.wa.gov)
  17. TxDOT, Crash Contributing Factors, 2025 (data as of April 7, 2026) (txdot.gov)
  18. NHTSA, Event Data Recorder (nhtsa.gov)

Important: This page is general information, not legal or medical advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different; talk to a lawyer about yours. Texas cases are handled by the firm’s Texas-licensed attorneys, Joyce Ondich and John Efstathiou. Last reviewed: November 7, 2026.

×

Free case review

Tell us what happened. We will tell you plainly whether there is a case and what to do next. You owe no fees or costs unless we win.

No fees or costs unless we win
© 2026 Beverly Law. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Free consultation
No fees or costs unless we win
Call Now · 24/7
4.8 out of 5 · 604 Google reviews
Skip to content