Beverly Law. Updated November 2026.
Bitten by a dog in Texas?
Leave your name and phone. We call back today, in English or Spanish. The consultation is free and confidential.
Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win
Where the Texas rule comes from
In Marshall v. Ranne, 511 S.W.2d 255 (Tex. 1974), the Texas Supreme Court held that claims over vicious animals are governed by strict liability. Under the Restatement rule it adopted, an owner who has reason to know an animal has abnormally dangerous propensities is liable for the harm, even after using the utmost care.
That knowledge requirement is where the “one bite” label comes from, though a prior bite is only one way to prove what the owner knew.
The same opinion said the owner of an animal that is not known to be vicious can still be liable for negligent handling. The Court applied that idea to dogs in Bushnell v. Mott, 254 S.W.3d 451 (Tex. 2008), holding that an owner of dogs not known to be vicious had a duty to use ordinary care to try to stop an attack once it started.
Lillian’s Law and criminal charges
In 2007 the Legislature passed House Bill 1355, which its text names “Lillian’s Law” and which rewrote Health and Safety Code § 822.005. An owner commits a crime if, with criminal negligence, the owner fails to secure the dog and the dog makes an unprovoked attack away from the owner’s property, vehicle or boat that causes serious bodily injury or death. A second part covers owners who know their dog is dangerous.
The offense is a third-degree felony, or second-degree if the victim dies. Prosecutors decide whether to charge; your injury claim is a separate civil matter.
Dangerous dog rules
Under § 822.041, a “dangerous dog” is one that makes an unprovoked attack causing bodily injury outside a secure enclosure, or acts in a way outside its enclosure that makes a person reasonably believe it will attack. Once an owner learns the dog is dangerous, § 822.042 gives the owner 30 days to:
- register the dog with the local animal control authority;
- keep it leashed under immediate control or in a secure enclosure at all times;
- carry at least $100,000 in liability insurance or financial responsibility and show proof to animal control;
- follow any city or county dangerous dog rules.
If a dangerous dog attacks outside its enclosure and causes bodily injury, the owner commits a Class C misdemeanor under § 822.044. A prior dangerous dog finding can be strong evidence the owner knew the risk.
Reporting the bite and rabies quarantine
Section 826.041 requires anyone who knows of a bite that could transmit rabies to report it to the local rabies control authority. Under § 826.042, the owner must submit the animal for quarantine. State rule 25 TAC § 169.27 sets a 10-day observation period for a dog, cat or domestic ferret that bites a person, starting at the time of the bite.
Free case review
Tell us what happened. We will tell you plainly whether there is a case and what to do next. You owe no fees or costs unless we win.
Deadlines and shared fault
| Texas rule | Number | Law |
|---|---|---|
| Deadline to sue | 2 years from the injury | CPRC § 16.003 |
| Injured child | Clock paused until 18 | CPRC § 16.001 |
| Recovery barred (ch. 33 claims) | More than 50% responsible | CPRC § 33.001 |
| Damages reduced (ch. 33 claims) | By your percentage | CPRC § 33.012 |
| Dangerous dog | 30 days; $100,000 coverage | H&S Code § 822.042 |
| Rabies observation | 10 days | 25 TAC § 169.27 |
Chapter 33 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code applies to tort claims generally (§ 33.002). Under it, if a jury finds you 20% responsible, for example by reaching toward a dog after being warned, your damages drop by 20%, and at 51% or more you recover nothing. Marshall v. Ranne, decided before chapter 33, said contributory negligence was no defense to strict liability for a vicious animal, so how shared fault works in a strict liability claim over a known dangerous dog is decided case by case.
Texas compared with California and Washington
| State | Main rule | Owner’s prior knowledge needed? |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | Strict liability if the owner knew of the danger (Marshall v. Ranne); otherwise negligence | Yes, for strict liability |
| California | Strict liability for bites in public or while lawfully on private property, including the owner’s (Civ. Code § 3342) | No |
| Washington | Same rule as California (RCW 16.08.040) | No |
Our California dog bite law guide explains § 3342.
What this means for your case
In Texas, the dog’s past often decides which claim fits. Write down what you have heard about earlier bites or complaints, and ask animal control for its report and any prior calls about the same dog. Get the owner’s name and address, photograph your wounds and keep every medical bill.
If the dog had no known history, the focus moves to what the owner did, such as leaving a gate open or not trying to stop the attack. Be careful with recorded statements to an insurer, since anything suggesting you provoked the dog can raise your share of fault.
Texas cases are handled by the firm’s Texas-licensed attorneys, including for clients in Austin and across Texas. You owe no fees or costs unless we win. Call (310) 552-6959 for a free consultation.
Common questions
Does Texas have a dog bite statute?
Not for civil injury claims. Texas courts apply the strict liability rule from Marshall v. Ranne for owners who knew of a dog’s dangerous tendencies, and negligence rules otherwise.
Can I bring a claim if the dog never bit anyone before?
Yes, through negligence. The Texas Supreme Court held in Bushnell v. Mott that an owner of a dog not known to be vicious still had to use ordinary care once an attack began.
How long do I have to file a dog bite lawsuit in Texas?
Generally two years from the injury under CPRC § 16.003. For a child, the time before age 18 is not counted under CPRC § 16.001.
What if I was partly at fault?
In a negligence claim, your damages are reduced by your percentage of responsibility, and above 50% you cannot recover. How that rule applies to a strict liability claim over a dog known to be dangerous is decided case by case.
Will the owner be charged under Lillian’s Law?
Only prosecutors decide that. The law covers unprovoked attacks off the owner’s property that cause serious bodily injury or death when the owner, with criminal negligence, failed to secure the dog.
Does the dog have to be quarantined after a bite?
Yes. Texas rules require a 10-day observation period for a dog, cat or domestic ferret that bites a person, supervised by the local rabies control authority.
Ask a question
Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.
Injury lawyer — Beverly Law
If you were hurt because of someone else in California, Texas or Washington, talk to a lawyer about your options. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You owe no fees or costs unless we win.
Related pages
FAQs · California dog bite law · Austin injury lawyers · Texas · Practice areas
Sources
- Marshall v. Ranne, 511 S.W.2d 255 (Tex. 1974), Texas Supreme Court opinion text
- Marshall v. Ranne in Torts: Cases, Problems, and Policy Choices (H2O Open Casebook)
- Bushnell v. Mott, 254 S.W.3d 451 (Tex. 2008), Michigan State University College of Law, Animal Legal & Historical Center
- Bushnell v. Mott, No. 06-1044 (Tex. Mar. 28, 2008), per curiam opinion, Supreme Court of Texas
- Texas H.B. 1355 (80th Leg., 2007), enrolled text (“Lillian’s Law”)
- Tex. Health & Safety Code § 822.005, attack by dog
- Tex. Health & Safety Code § 822.041, dangerous dog definitions
- Tex. Health & Safety Code § 822.042, requirements for owner of dangerous dog
- Tex. Health & Safety Code § 822.044, attack by dangerous dog
- Tex. Health & Safety Code § 826.041, reports of rabies
- Tex. Health & Safety Code § 826.042, quarantine of animals
- 25 Tex. Admin. Code § 169.27, quarantine method and testing (Cornell Legal Information Institute)
- Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003, two-year limitations period
- Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.001, effect of disability (minors)
- Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.001, proportionate responsibility
- Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.002, applicability of chapter 33
- Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.012, amount of recovery
- Cal. Civ. Code § 3342, dog bite liability
- RCW 16.08.040, dog bites liability (Washington)
Important: This page is general information, not legal or medical advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different; talk to a lawyer about yours. Texas cases are handled by the firm’s Texas-licensed attorneys. Last reviewed: November 6, 2026.