By Michael Shemtoub, trial attorney, Beverly Law. Updated November 2026.
Questions about your injury case?
Leave your name and phone. We call back today, in English or Spanish. The consultation is free and confidential.
Free consultation · English y Español · No fees or costs unless we win
The federal claim: Section 1983
Federal police misconduct claims rest on a Reconstruction-era statute. It makes “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage” of a state deprives someone of federal constitutional or statutory rights “liable to the party injured” (42 U.S.C. 1983).
Who can be sued shapes what a case may pay:
- Individual officers. They are often the main defendants, and qualified immunity (below) is their main defense.
- Cities and counties. The Supreme Court held that “a local government may not be sued under § 1983 for an injury inflicted solely by its employees or agents.” A government is liable when “execution of a government’s policy or custom” inflicts the injury (Monell v. Department of Social Services). The Court has also held that “a municipality is immune from punitive damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983” (City of Newport v. Fact Concerts).
Section 1983 has no deadline of its own. Courts “should borrow the general or residual statute for personal injury actions” of the state (Owens v. Okure). That is two years in California (CCP 335.1) and Texas (CPRC 16.003), and three years in Washington (RCW 4.16.080).
Qualified immunity and the appeal before trial
Under the standard set in 1982, “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages” unless their conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights that a reasonable person would have known (Harlow v. Fitzgerald). Whether a right was clearly established on the facts of a case can be argued on a motion before any trial.
The timing matters as much as the rule. The Court has called qualified immunity “an immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to liability,” and held that a district court’s denial of it, to the extent it turns on an issue of law, is an appealable “final decision” even though the case has not ended (Mitchell v. Forsyth). So an officer who loses that motion can appeal, and the case can pause while the appeal is decided.
For anyone weighing an advance, this means two things. A claim against an officer can end on immunity without a trial. Most advances are non-recourse, so you would normally owe nothing then, though contracts can make exceptions; see what happens if you lose your case. And an appeal can add a long stretch during which charges keep growing under most contracts.
State-law claims and government claim deadlines
Many cases also include state-law claims, such as battery or negligence, against the city or county. Those claims usually carry their own notice rules:
| State | Rule for claims against a government | Source |
|---|---|---|
| California | A claim for death or injury to a person must be presented “not later than six months after the accrual of the cause of action.” After a written rejection, suit must be filed within six months of the notice; without one, within two years of accrual. | Gov. Code 911.2; Gov. Code 945.6 |
| Texas | A governmental unit is entitled to notice within six months of the incident, unless it already had actual notice, and a city’s charter can require notice sooner. The Tort Claims Act does not apply to claims “arising out of assault, battery, false imprisonment, or any other intentional tort.” | Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code 101.101, 101.057 |
| Washington | No suit against a local government may start until 60 calendar days after the claim is presented, and the limitations period is tolled during those 60 days. | RCW 4.96.020(4) |
These rules do not govern the federal claim. When a Section 1983 suit is brought in state court, a state notice-of-claim law “is pre-empted” (Felder v. Casey). The six-month California rule is explained in more detail on our page about claims against a city or county.
Free case review
Tell us what happened. We will tell you plainly whether there is a case and what to do next. You owe no fees or costs unless we win.
Fee awards under Section 1988
In a Section 1983 case “the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party” a “reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs” (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)). A fee award is separate from your damages, and the Supreme Court has held that Section 1988 “does not interfere with the enforceability of a contingent fee contract” that gives the lawyer more than the court-awarded fee (Venegas v. Mitchell). Your own fee agreement decides how an award is credited, and that changes how much is left to repay a funder.
Taxes and the payoff
Damages for personal physical injuries, as in many force cases, are generally not taxed. Emotional distress damages that do not come from a physical injury are taxable, and punitive damages are taxable even in a physical injury case (IRS Publication 4345). See is a lawsuit advance taxable for how an advance itself is treated.
California’s funding law limits charges to 36 months from the funding date and requires them to be set by time intervals (Bus. & Prof. Code 6250(a), 6253). Other states differ; see the laws by state table and what pre-settlement funding costs.
What to ask before you sign
- Who are the defendants: individual officers, the city or county, or both?
- Has a government claim been presented for any state-law claims, and when was it rejected?
- Has qualified immunity been raised, and is an appeal pending or likely?
- What will I owe at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months if an appeal adds time?
- How does my fee agreement treat a fee award under Section 1988?
- What case papers would the funder want to see? Read about funding and attorney-client privilege first.
The rest of this section starts at the lawsuit cash advance guide.
Common questions
Does qualified immunity protect the city?
Harlow’s rule protects individual officials. A city’s liability under Section 1983 turns on Monell’s policy-or-custom rule.
Do I need to file a government claim for the federal civil rights claim?
No. Felder v. Casey held that a state notice-of-claim law is pre-empted when a Section 1983 suit is brought in state court. State-law claims against the government still need the claim.
Can the case stop for an appeal before trial?
Yes. A denial of qualified immunity that turns on a question of law can be appealed right away.
Are punitive damages available?
Not against a city or county under Section 1983. Whether they are available against an individual officer is a question for your lawyer.
Do civil rights cases go to federal court?
They can, and a Section 1983 claim can also be brought in state court, as the Felder case shows. Texas cases are handled by the firm’s Texas-licensed attorneys, Joyce Ondich and John Efstathiou. Beverly Law does not offer or arrange lawsuit funding and receives no payment from funding companies. Beverly Law offers a free case review in English or Spanish at (310) 552-6959 if you have questions about your case. You owe no fees or costs unless we win.
Ask a question
Not ready to call? Write your question and someone on our team will answer. No cost, no commitment.
Injury lawyer — Beverly Law
Hurt because of someone else in California, Texas and Washington? Talk to an injury attorney. Free, confidential, English or Spanish. You owe no fees or costs unless we win.
Related pages
Cash advance on a lawsuit · Laws by state · Injury law FAQs
Sources
- 42 U.S.C. 1983 (Cornell LII) (law.cornell.edu)
- 42 U.S.C. 1988 (Cornell LII) (law.cornell.edu)
- Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978) (Justia) (supreme.justia.com)
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc., 453 U.S. 247 (1981) (Justia) (supreme.justia.com)
- Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235 (1989) (Justia) (supreme.justia.com)
- Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982) (Justia) (supreme.justia.com)
- Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511 (1985) (Justia) (supreme.justia.com)
- Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 (1988) (Cornell LII) (law.cornell.edu)
- Venegas v. Mitchell, 495 U.S. 82 (1990) (Justia) (supreme.justia.com)
- Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 335.1 (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code 16.003 (Texas Legislative Council) (tcss.legis.texas.gov)
- RCW 4.16.080 (app.leg.wa.gov)
- Cal. Gov. Code 911.2 (official, leginfo) (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Cal. Gov. Code 911.2 as read (california.public.law)
- Cal. Gov. Code 945.6 (official, leginfo) (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
- Cal. Gov. Code 945.6 as read (california.public.law)
- Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ch. 101 (Texas Legislative Council) (tcss.legis.texas.gov)
- RCW 4.96.020 (official) (app.leg.wa.gov)
- RCW 4.96.020 as read (Justia, 2025 code) (law.justia.com)
- IRS Publication 4345, Settlements: Taxability (irs.gov)
- AB 931 chaptered text, Bus. & Prof. Code 6250, 6253 (official, leginfo) (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)
Important: This page is general information, not legal or medical advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different; talk to a lawyer about yours. Texas cases are handled by the firm’s Texas-licensed attorneys, Joyce Ondich and John Efstathiou. Last reviewed: November 7, 2026.
